Career Plans of US Physicians After the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Comparison of embryologist stress, somatization, and burnout reported by embryologists working in UK HFEA-licensed ART/IVF clinics and USA ART/IVF clinics

STUDY QUESTION

What is the prevalence of occupational stress, somatization, and burnout reported by UK and US, embryologists and the impact of work conditions on these well-being outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Surveyed UK and US embryologists reported moderate perceived stress, low somatic symptom severity, high levels of burnout, and overall stressful work conditions, but with differences that could be due to country-specific occupational and employment characteristics.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?

Spanish, UK, US, and international surveys have identified high levels of occupational stress, somatization, burnout, and occupational health issues among embryologists. These issues have been attributed to embryologists' occupational challenges and work conditions.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to 253 embryologists working in UK ART/IVF clinics and 487 embryologists working in US ART/IVF clinics.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants self-reported their stress levels, somatization, burnout, and work conditions. Proportions across the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), a single-item work unit grade (A-F), and customized occupational and sociodemographic questionnaires were calculated using descriptive statistics. Welch's t-test was utilized to compare PSS and PHQ-15 scores between groups. Risk ratios were calculated using log-binomial regression for all models except for levels of anxiety related to performing cryostorage tasks, for which Poisson models were used.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 50.6% (128) of the embryologists in the UK and 50.1% (244) in the US completed the survey. Both groups self-reported moderate PSS and low PHQ-15 scores, although fewer UK embryologists scored high on the MBI cynicism dimension than their US colleagues (43% UK vs 60% US embryologists, P < 0.05). The UK and US embryologists did not differ on the MBI exhaustion dimension with both scoring high for exhaustion (59% UK vs 62% US). Although 81% and 80% of UK and US embryologists, respectively, reported working overtime, more embryologists in the UK reported being adequately compensated. Increasing levels of anxiety-related to cryostorage showed a dose-dependent increased risk of burnout on at least two MBI-GS dimensions only in the UK group, and, a dose-dependent likelihood of higher PSS and PHQ-15 scores in both groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Since the two groups were surveyed 9 months apart and were self-reporting, the study is limited by the differences in responsibilities, scheduling, and workload specific to the time of year.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Work-related health issues and occupational challenges shared by UK and US embryologists could be addressed by organizational enhancements and technology. Lower levels of stress and burnout among UK embryologists might be due to the HFEA-provided structure/certainty.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported without any external funding by TMRW Life Sciences Inc., which is developing and commercializing an automated platform for embryology. M.G.C. and M.S.L. are full-time employees and stockholders/shareholders with TMRW Life Sciences, and A.M. of Novavax, Inc. was an employee of TMRW Life Sciences. G.P. is a consultant for TMRW Life Sciences. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05326802; NCT05708963.

Hobbies, Distractions, Obsessions, and Addictions

A career in cardiothoracic surgery takes a psychological and emotional toll, which is likely increased by recent changes in our health care environment. The benefits of leisure pursuits are severalfold, one of which includes supporting physician wellness. However, we are at risk of relying on unhealthy mechanisms to provide relief. The incidence of addiction and substance abuse is high, particularly among women surgeons. There are a variety of opportunities to help ourselves and support our colleagues. We need to promote healthy activities outside of our profession for the long-term well-being of cardiothoracic surgeons and our specialty.

Characteristics and Habits of Psychiatrists and Neurologists With High Occupational Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study

Objective

To identify the characteristics that distinguish occupationally well outliers (OWO), a subset of academic psychiatrists and neurologists with consistently high professional fulfillment and low burnout, from their counterparts with lower levels of occupational well-being.

Participants and Methods

Participants included faculty physicians practicing psychiatry and neurology in academic medical centers affiliated with the Professional Well-being Academic Consortium. In this prospective, longitudinal study, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used. Quantitative measures were administered to physicians in a longitudinal occupational well-being survey sponsored by the academic organizations where they work. Four organizations participated in the qualitative study. Psychiatrists and neurologists at these organizations who competed survey measures at 2 consecutive time points between 2019 and 2021 were invited to participate in an interview.

Results

Of 410 (213 psychiatrists and 197 neurologists) who completed professional fulfillment and burnout measures at 2 time points, 84 (20.5%) met OWO criteria. Occupationally well outliers psychiatrists and neurologists had more favorable scores on hypothesized determinants of well-being (values alignment, perceived gratitude, supportive leadership, peer support, and control of schedule). Ultimately, 31 psychiatrists (25% of 124 invited) and 33 neurologists (18.5% of 178 invited) agreed to participate in an interview. Qualitatively, OWO physicians differed from all others in 3 thematic domains: development of life grounded in priorities, ability to shape day-to-day work context, and professional relationships that provide joy and support.

Conclusion

A multilevel approach is necessary to promote optimal occupational well-being, targeting individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and broader system-level factors.