1
|
Connor JP, Stjepanović D, Budney AJ, Le Foll B, Hall WD. Clinical management of cannabis withdrawal. Addiction 2022; 117:2075-2095. [PMID: 34791767 PMCID: PMC9110555 DOI: 10.1111/add.15743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cannabis withdrawal is a well-characterized phenomenon that occurs in approximately half of regular and dependent cannabis users after abrupt cessation or significant reductions in cannabis products that contain Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). This review describes the diagnosis, prevalence, course and management of cannabis withdrawal and highlights opportunities for future clinical research. METHODS Narrative review of literature. RESULTS Symptom onset typically occurs 24-48 hours after cessation and most symptoms generally peak at days 2-6, with some symptoms lasting up to 3 weeks or more in heavy cannabis users. The most common features of cannabis withdrawal are anxiety, irritability, anger or aggression, disturbed sleep/dreaming, depressed mood and loss of appetite. Less common physical symptoms include chills, headaches, physical tension, sweating and stomach pain. Despite limited empirical evidence, supportive counselling and psychoeducation are the first-line approaches in the management of cannabis withdrawal. There are no medications currently approved specifically for medically assisted withdrawal (MAW). Medications have been used to manage short-term symptoms (e.g. anxiety, sleep, nausea). A number of promising pharmacological agents have been examined in controlled trials, but these have been underpowered and positive findings not reliably replicated. Some (e.g. cannabis agonists) are used 'off-label' in clinical practice. Inpatient admission for MAW may be clinically indicated for patients who have significant comorbid mental health disorders and polysubstance use to avoid severe complications. CONCLUSIONS The clinical significance of cannabis withdrawal is that its symptoms may precipitate relapse to cannabis use. Complicated withdrawal may occur in people with concurrent mental health and polysubstance use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason P. Connor
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQLDAustralia,Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandHerstonQLDAustralia
| | - Daniel Stjepanović
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQLDAustralia
| | - Alan J. Budney
- Center for Technology and Behavioral HealthGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthLebanonNHUSA
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoONCanada,Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Psychiatry, Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of TorontoONCanada
| | - Wayne D. Hall
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQLDAustralia,Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health SciencesThe University of QueenslandWoolloongabbaQLDAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zamboni L, Centoni F, Fusina F, Mantovani E, Rubino F, Lugoboni F, Federico A. The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Narrative Review of Evidence. J Nerv Ment Dis 2021; 209:835-845. [PMID: 34698698 DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000001381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Substance use disorders (SUDs) are characterized by a recurrent and maladaptive use of drugs and/or alcohol. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) comprise different types of interventions: traditional CBT and the more recent "third wave" behavior therapies, such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and schema therapy (ST). We searched English-language articles published between 2014 and present. This review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, pilot studies, and reviews of CBTs for SUDs available on PubMed. Results seem to indicate that CBT and MBCT are effective interventions for SUDs; however, the studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity, so no exhaustive conclusions could be outlined at this time. ACT and DBT in SUD management are limited to few studies and results are therefore inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesco Centoni
- Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Unit, Verona University Hospital
| | | | - Elisa Mantovani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona
| | - Francesca Rubino
- Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Unit, Verona University Hospital
| | - Fabio Lugoboni
- Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Unit, Verona University Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levin FR, Mariani JJ, Choi CJ, Basaraba C, Brooks DJ, Brezing CA, Pavlicova M. Non-abstinent treatment outcomes for cannabis use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 225:108765. [PMID: 34087745 PMCID: PMC8282674 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abstinence remains a standard outcome for potential treatment interventions for Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD). However, there needs to be validation of non-abstinent outcomes. This study explores reductions in self-reported days of use as another viable outcome measure using data from three completed randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for CUD. METHODS The three trials tested the effect of quetiapine (QTP, n = 113); dronabinol (DRO, n = 156); and lofexidine + dronabinol (LFD, n = 122). Self-reported cannabis use was categorized into three use-groups/week: heavy (5-7 days/week), moderate (2-4 days/week) and light use (0-1 days/week). Multinomial logistic regressions analyzed the treatment by time effect on the likelihood of light and moderate use compared to heavy use in each study. RESULTS Across the three trials, there was no significant overall time-by-treatment interaction (QTP: p = .06; DRO: p = .15; LFD: p = .21). However, the odds of moderate compared to heavy use were significantly higher in treatment than in placebo groups starting around the midpoint of each trial. No treatment differences were found between the odds of light compared to heavy use. CONCLUSIONS While study-end abstinence rates have been a standard treatment outcome for CUD trials, reduction from heavy to moderate use has not been standardly assessed. During the last several weeks of each trial, those on active medication were more likely to move from heavy to moderate use, which suggests that certain medications may be more impactful than previously assessed. Future studies should determine if this pattern is associated with less CUD severity and/or improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances R. Levin
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA,Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA,Address correspondence to: Frances R. Levin, M.D., 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 66, New York, New York 10032 USA, Telephone: (646) 774-6137 FAX: (212) 543-6018,
| | - John J. Mariani
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA,Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - C. Jean Choi
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Mental Health Data Science, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Cale Basaraba
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Mental Health Data Science, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Daniel J. Brooks
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Christina A. Brezing
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA,Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Martina Pavlicova
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is an underappreciated risk of using cannabis that affects ~10% of the 193 million cannabis users worldwide. The individual and public health burdens are less than those of other forms of drug use, but CUD accounts for a substantial proportion of persons seeking treatment for drug use disorders owing to the high global prevalence of cannabis use. Cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational enhancement therapy and contingency management can substantially reduce cannabis use and cannabis-related problems, but enduring abstinence is not a common outcome. No pharmacotherapies have been approved for cannabis use or CUD, although a number of drug classes (such as cannabinoid agonists) have shown promise and require more rigorous evaluation. Treatment of cannabis use and CUD is often complicated by comorbid mental health and other substance use disorders. The legalization of non-medical cannabis use in some high-income countries may increase the prevalence of CUD by making more potent cannabis products more readily available at a lower price. States that legalize medical and non-medical cannabis use should inform users about the risks of CUD and provide information on how to obtain assistance if they develop cannabis-related mental and/or physical health problems.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, no study has reported the prevalence of cannabis use in chronic pain patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the trends in cannabis use among chronic pain in-patients from 2011 to 2015 in the USA. METHODS Patients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes for chronic pain and cannabis use. Annual estimates and trends were determined for cannabis use, patient characteristics, cannabis use among subgroups of chronic pain conditions, cost, length of stay, and associated discharge diagnosis. RESULTS Between 2011 to 2015, a total of 247,949 chronic pain patients were cannabis users, increasing from 33,189 to 72,115 (P < 0.001). There were upward trends of cannabis use in females (38.7-40.7%; P = 0.03), Medicare insured patients (32.7-40.4%; P < 0.01), patients with lowest annual household income (36.1-40.9%; P = 0.02), patients aged 45-64 years (45.9-49.2%; P < 0.001), and patients with tobacco use disorder (63.8-72.4%; P < 0.0001). Concurrently, cannabis use decreased among patients with opioid use disorder (23.8-19.9%; P < 0.001). Cannabis use increased from 2011 to 2015 in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome, trauma, spondylosis, and failed back surgery syndrome. Adjusted total hospitalization cost increased from $31,271 ($1333) in 2011 to $38,684 ($946) in 2015 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Cannabis use increased substantially from 2011 to 2015, while the rates of cannabis use in opioid users down-trended simultaneously. Disparities in cannabis use among subgroups should be explored further.
Collapse
|
6
|
Andrews CN, Devlin SM, Le Foll B, Fischer B, Tse F, Storr M, Congly SE. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Position Statement: Use of Cannabis in Gastroenterological and Hepatic Disorders. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2018; 2:37-43. [PMID: 31294362 PMCID: PMC6507278 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher N Andrews
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Correspondence: Christopher N Andrews, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Clinical Professor, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 6th Floor, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada. E-mail
| | - Shane M Devlin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Acute Care Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frances Tse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Storr
- Department of Medicine, University of Munich and Center of Endoscopy, Starnberg, Germany
| | - Stephen E Congly
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|