High resolution melting analysis of deletion/insertion polymorphisms: A new method for the detection and quantification of mixed chimerism in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

A High-Resolution Melting Analysis with an Unlabeled Probe for CRISPR/Cas9-Induced ZBED6 Knockout Pigs Detection

BACKGROUND

The zinc finger BED-type containing six knockout (ZBED6-KO) pigs were created to improve economic traits by increasing the expression of insulin-like growth factor 2. They were generated by CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology and a single-base deletion of ZBED6 was found. An efficient and rapid method was needed to detect this type of pig.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a high-resolution melting (HRM) method to detect ZBED6-KO pigs.

METHODS

An unlabeled probe and two primers were designed to develop the HRM method. The limit of detection, specificity, and accuracy of the established method were tested by the constructed plasmid and DNA extracts of tissue specimens.

RESULTS

The limit of detection by the established method was 102 copies/µL. The HRM method with an unlabeled probe showed good specificity and high accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The established HRM analysis with an unlabeled probe showed it to be a highly effective, rapid, and reliable method to distinguish ZBED6-KO pigs from wild-type pigs.

HIGHLIGHTS

It is the first time that HRM analysis with an unlabeled probe has been used in the detection of genome editing pigs by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology.

Non-Homologous End Joining and Homology Directed DNA Repair Frequency of Double-Stranded Breaks Introduced by Genome Editing Reagents

Genome editing using transcription-activator like effector nucleases or RNA guided nucleases allows one to precisely engineer desired changes within a given target sequence. The genome editing reagents introduce double stranded breaks (DSBs) at the target site which can then undergo DNA repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology directed recombination (HDR) when a template DNA molecule is available. NHEJ repair results in indel mutations at the target site. As PCR amplified products from mutant target regions are likely to exhibit different melting profiles than PCR products amplified from wild type target region, we designed a high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for rapid identification of efficient genome editing reagents. We also designed TaqMan assays using probes situated across the cut site to discriminate wild type from mutant sequences present after genome editing. The experiments revealed that the sensitivity of the assays to detect NHEJ-mediated DNA repair could be enhanced by selection of transfected cells to reduce the contribution of unmodified genomic DNA from untransfected cells to the DNA melting profile. The presence of donor template DNA lacking the target sequence at the time of genome editing further enhanced the sensitivity of the assays for detection of mutant DNA molecules by excluding the wild-type sequences modified by HDR. A second TaqMan probe that bound to an adjacent site, outside of the primary target cut site, was used to directly determine the contribution of HDR to DNA repair in the presence of the donor template sequence. The TaqMan qPCR assay, designed to measure the contribution of NHEJ and HDR in DNA repair, corroborated the results from HRMA. The data indicated that genome editing reagents can produce DSBs at high efficiency in HEK293T cells but a significant proportion of these are likely masked by reversion to wild type as a result of HDR. Supplying a donor plasmid to provide a template for HDR (that eliminates a PCR amplifiable target) revealed these cryptic DSBs and facilitated the determination of the true efficacy of genome editing reagents. The results indicated that in HEK293T cells, approximately 40% of the DSBs introduced by genome editing, were available for participation in HDR.

Comparison of 3 Methodologies for Genotyping of Small Deletion and Insertion Polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

The quantification of genomic chimerism is increasingly recognized for its clinical significance after transplantation. Before the measurement of chimerism, accurate genotyping of genetic polymorphisms for informative alleles that can distinguish donor DNA from recipient DNA is essential. The ease of allelic discrimination of small deletion and insertion polymorphisms (DIPs) makes DIPs attractive markers to track chimerism. Current methodologies for the genotyping of DIPs are largely based on “open-tube” approaches. “Closed-tube” approaches involving no or minimal post-PCR handling are preferred. We compared 3 distinct methodologies to determine an optimal platform for DIP genotyping.

METHODS

Genomic DNA from 19 normal individuals was genotyped for 6 small biallelic DIPs using high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA), probe-free droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and microfluidic electrophoresis of PCR products. For HRMA, 3 different platforms were compared.

RESULTS

Our newly developed probe-free ddPCR approach allowed the genotype of each DIP to be determined by fluorescence intensity based on amplicon size. Microfluidic electrophoresis also allowed genotypes to be determined by amplicon size. HRMA assays allowed the genotype of each DIP to be determined by melting profile. Genotyping results were concordant between the 3 methodologies. HRMA was the most readily performed methodology and was robust across 3 separate HRMA-capable platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the effectiveness of probe-free ddPCR to accurately genotype small biallelic DIPs. Nevertheless, HRMA proved to be the optimal approach for genotyping small DIPs because closed-tube approaches are preferred owing to rapid and less laborious workflows and least risk of PCR contamination.