Carrillo-Cruz E, Marín-Oyaga VA, Solé Rodríguez M, Borrego-Dorado I, de la Cruz Vicente F, Quiroga Cantero E, Manzanares Pérez M, Capote FJ, Ramírez Sánchez MJ, Espigado Tocino I, Pérez-Vega H, Vázquez-Albertino R, Pérez-Simón JA. Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma.
Eur J Haematol 2015;
94:23-30. [PMID:
24520874 DOI:
10.1111/ejh.12284]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly FDG-avid even though its usefulness in the management of these patients is still controversial.
AIM
We analyzed the role of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in staging newly diagnosed patients with BL and evaluating disease after first-line chemotherapy.
METHODS
Fifty-two PET/CTs were performed in 32 patients (20 at diagnosis, 27 after treatment, five to monitor residual disease). Involved areas were retrospectively compared with those observed in contrast-enhanced CT.
RESULTS
Discrepancies were found in 64.7% of patients for whom results of both tests at diagnosis were available (n = 17), most of them involving extranodal sites. Regarding response assessment, discrepancies were observed in 38% of patients with both tests (5/13): residual masses detected by CT with negative PET/CT. Of 27 patients with post-treatment PET/CT, 22 were in complete remission whereas one true-positive and four false-positive lesions (two nodal and two extranodal) were detected. With a median follow-up of 27 months, 22 patients with negative PET/CT did not relapse. Thus, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. With respect to positive predictive value (PPV), one of five patients with positive assays after treatment died due to progression while the remaining four had false-positive lesions. Nevertheless, for these four patients, mean SUVmax at nodal sites was 4.1 vs. 14.9 at diagnosis, while mean SUVmax at extranodal sites was 3.8 vs. 12.1. Thus, with a cutoff value for SUVmax < 66% of that observed at diagnosis, PPV was also 100%.
CONCLUSION
More accurate staging can be achieved using PET/CT. NPV reaches 100%, and using a ΔSUV < 66%, a high PPV is also observed.
Collapse