Avances en el tratamiento anticoagulante de la fibrilación auricular

Strategies for improving dabigatran adherence for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: education and drug intake reminders (FACILITA study)

Objective To assess the efficacy of a mixed intervention, educational, and reminder calendar of the intake, as a strategy to improve therapeutic adherence with dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods This was a prospective, longitudinal, multi-center study, carried out in 110 specialized healthcare centers in Spain. Seven hundred and twenty-six patients treated with dabigatran prescribed for stroke prevention were included. A cluster randomization was performed based on two groups: (1) Control Group (CG) as usual clinical practice, and (2) Intervention Group (IG) with a mixed strategy: (a) Healthcare education, and (b) Use of a reminder calendar for taking the anticoagulant medication. Three visits took place: baseline and follow-up at 6 and 12 months. Compliance was measured by using electronic monitors (MEMS). Average adherence percentage (%; Average AP) and daily compliance (%; Daily AP) was calculated. A patient was considered adherent when AP was 80-100%. Results Six hundred and twenty-five patients completed the study (315 in the IG and 310 in the CG). Daily AP was 91.97% at 6 months and 91.05% after 12 months in the IG and 82.26% and 82.63% in the CG. Average adherence was 90.79% and 89.20% in the IG and 64.51% and 63.22% in the CG at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the Daily AP and Average AP, with higher percentages in the IG. In the non-adherents group, the number of concomitant drugs, baseline, and 6 months SBP values, 6 and 12 months DBP values, and weight, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol were significantly higher. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 3.84 patients to prevent one non-adherence. Conclusions A mixed intervention, consisting of patient education and a simple calendar reminder of drug intake, is an effective strategy to improve dabigatran therapeutic adherence in patients with NVAF. The percentage of adherence with dabigatran was high.

Quality of life with rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrilation by therapeutic compliance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of life (QOL) with rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrilation (NVAF) related to therapeutic compliance.

METHODS

Prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was developed in 160 Spanish primary or specialized care centers. We included 412 patients treated with rivaroxaban, prescribed for stroke prevention. Three visits were conducted: baseline, 6 and 12 months. Compliance was measured by electronic monitoring systems. QOL was measured by a specific questionnaire. We calculated the percentage of compliance means, the percentage of daily compliers and the score of QOL.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy patients finished the study (mean age 75.19 SD: 7.5 years). Daily compliance was 83.5% (CI 78.53-88.57%) (n = 309) and 80% (CI 74.65-85.35%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Average QOL rating was 112.85 (SD 29.31) in non-compliant and 111.80 (SD 29.31) in the compliant group (p = Not significant), and after 12 months of 124.67 (SD 30.78) and 83.47 (SD 26.44), respectively (p < 0.0001), with a decrease in the score compliers (p < 0.01) and an increase in non-compliant group (p < 0.05). A higher number of drugs consumed, as well as the number of diseases/conditions suffered, the older age of the patients and having been previously treated with VKA were associated with a higher overall score (worse QOL).

CONCLUSIONS

QOL in NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban improved significantly over the study group at the expense of compliers. A worse QOL was associated with pluripathology, polymedication, older patients and previous treatment with VKA.

Therapeutic compliance with rivaroxaban in preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: CUMRIVAFA study

OBJECTIVE

To assess compliance with treatment with rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study, developed in 160 Spanish primary or specialized care centers. We included 412 patients treated with rivaroxaban, prescribed for stroke prevention. Three visits were conducted: baseline, 6 and 12 months. Compliance was measured by using electronic monitors (MEMSs) that use a digital record in the form of a microchip in the lid of the drug container that automatically controls its opening and registers the time and date of the opening. We calculated the average compliance percentage (CP), global and daily compliance. We considered compliance to be when CP was 80-100%.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy patients ended the study (mean age 75.19, SD: 7.5 years). Global compliance was 84.1% (CI = 79.21-88.99%) and 80.3% (CI = 74.98-85.62%) after 6 and 12 months respectively. Daily compliance was 83.5% (CI = 78.53-88.57%) and 80% (CI = 74.65-85.35%) at 6 and 12 months. Significant differences in the CP between 6 and 12 months were observed. Global CP was 90.77% after 6 months and 89.65% at the end of the study. Daily CP was 90.14% and 87.66% at 6 and 12 months. There were significant CP differences between 6 and 12 months. Non-compliance was associated with a higher number of concomitant diseases, number of drugs taken and weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of compliance with rivaroxaban was high. A profile of variables that need to be modified in current medical practice, associated with non-compliance, was detected.

Suboptimal Use of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Has the Introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Improved Prescribing Practices?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation.

LITERATURE SOURCE AND SELECTION CRITERIA

In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic.

RESULTS

Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice.

CONCLUSION

Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.