[Predictive factors of clinically significant drug-drug interactions among regimens based on protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and raltegravir]

Prevalence of Potentially Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions With Antiretrovirals Against HIV Over Three Decades: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Contemporary first-line antiretrovirals have considerably reduced liability for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDI). This systematic review evaluates the prevalence of DDI among people receiving antiretrovirals across 3 decades.

METHODS

We searched 3 databases for studies reporting the prevalence of clinically significant DDIs in patients receiving antiretrovirals published between January 1987 and July 2022. Clinically significant DDIs were graded by severity. All data extractions were undertaken by 2 independent reviewers, adjudicated by a third.

RESULTS

Of 21,665 records returned, 13,474 were duplicates. After screening the remaining 13,596 abstracts against inclusion criteria, 122 articles were included for full-text analysis, from which a final list of 34 articles were included for data synthesis. The proportion of patients experiencing a clinically significant DDI did not change over time (P = 0.072). The most frequently reported classes of antiretrovirals involved in DDIs were protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; of note, integrase use in the most recent studies was highly variable and ranged between 0% and 89%.

CONCLUSIONS

The absolute risk of DDIs has not decreased over the period covered. This is likely related to continued use of older regimens and an ageing cohort of patients. A greater reduction in DDI prevalence can be anticipated with broader uptake of regimens containing unboosted integrase inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Antiretroviral Therapy-Induced Dysregulation of Gene Expression and Lipid Metabolism in HIV+ Patients: Beneficial Role of Antioxidant Phytochemicals

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has continued to be the subject of study since its discovery nearly 40 years ago. Significant advances in research and intake of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have slowed the progression and appearance of the disease symptoms and the incidence of concomitant diseases, which are the leading cause of death in HIV+ persons. However, the prolongation of ART is closely related to chronic degenerative diseases and pathologies caused by oxidative stress (OS) and alterations in lipid metabolism (increased cholesterol levels), both of which are conditions of ART. Therefore, recent research focuses on using natural therapies to diminish the effects of ART and HIV infection: regulating lipid metabolism and reducing OS status. The present review summarizes current information on OS and cholesterol metabolism in HIV+ persons and how the consumption of certain phytochemicals can modulate these. For this purpose, MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were consulted to identify publications investigating HIV disease and natural therapies and their associated effects.

Recognition of possible risk factors for clinically significant drug-drug interactions among Indian people living with HIV receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy and concomitant medications

BACKGROUND

Greatest challenges for clinician is to recognize risk factors for clinically significant drug interactions (CSDIs). There is a lack of awareness about CSDIs among healthcare professionals in India.

OBJECTIVE

To recognize all possible risk factors for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and to identify clinically significant drug interactions (CSDIs), the prevalence, pattern of occurrence of DDIs in People Living with HIV (PLW-HIV) receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and concomitant medications.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was carried out by clinical pharmacist with ethics committee approval. Case files of HIV patients receiving HAART with concomitant medications were analyzed for CSDIs using University of Liverpool drug interaction database and CSDIs were classified based on red flag indication (RFI) or contraindicated drug-drug interaction (XDDIs) and orange flag indication (OFI) or DDIs that needs close monitoring. Patients with DDIs (cases) and patients without DDIs (controls) were compared with Chi-square tests. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 240 HIV patients' cases were screened. Out of which 267 DDIs were reported in 107 patients. Prevalence of DDIs was higher in male 71 (66.4%) compared to female 36 (33.6%). On zero-inflated poisson regression analysis, factors of polypharmacy, opportunistic infections, comorbid condition like Ischemic heart disease, respiratory tract infections, and psychiatric disorder were found to be predictors of high risk factors for DDIs to HAART. Fourteen XDDIs with RFI and two hundred fifty three DDIs with OFI were reported. XDDIs were atazanavir with fluconazole 4 (28.6%), ritonavir with fluconazole 4 (28.6%), nevirapine with rifampicin 2 (14.4%), ritonavir with quetiapine, atazanavir with pantoprazole. Pharmacokinetic DDIs were highest 238 (89.1%). Sixteen DDIs were reported in a single patient. The majority 97 (90.6%) patients had developed ≤5 DDIs, 8 (7.5%) developed six to eleven DDIs. The highest DDIs were reported with efavirenz 49 (18.4%) and zidovudine 44 (16.5%) based HAART regimen.

CONCLUSION

In India, with the increasing access to HAART usage, Clinician must focus to pay attention to recognize possible risk factors for CSDIs associated with HAART regimen and strictly to avoid "Red Flag Indication combinations" while prescribing so as to prevent CSDIs.

Frequency and severity of potential drug interactions in a cohort of HIV-infected patients Identified through a Multidisciplinary team

OBJECTIVES

Interactions between antiretroviral treatment (ART) and comedications are a concern in HIV-infected patients. This study aimed to determine the frequency and severity of potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) with ART in our setting.

METHODS

Observational study by a multidisciplinary team in 1259 consecutive HIV patients (March 2015-September 2016). Data on demographics, toxic habits, comorbidities, and current ART were collected. A structured questionnaire recorded concomitant medications (including occasional and over-the-counter drugs). PDDIs were classified into four categories: (1) no interactions, (2) mild (clinically non-significant), (3) moderate (requiring close monitoring or drug modification/dose adjustment), and (4) severe (contraindicated).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

chi-square test, logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 881 (70%) patients took comedication, and 563 (44.7%) had ≥ PDDI. Forty-one comedicated patients (4.6%) had severe and 522 (59.2%) moderate PDDIs. Moderate PDDIs mainly involved cardiovascular (53.8%) and central nervous system (40.2%) drugs. Independent risk factors for PDDIs were ART containing a boosted protease inhibitor (odds ratio [OR]=9.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.15-16.11; p = 0.0001) and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 2.49-7.55; p = 0.0001), HCV co-infection (OR = 3.26, 95%CI 2.15-4.93; p = 0.0001), and use of two or more comedications (OR = 3.36, 95%CI 2.27-4.97; p = 0.0001). Adherence and effectiveness of ART were similar in patients with and without PDDIs. The team made 133 recommendations related to comedications (drug change or dose adjustment) or ART (drug switch or change in administration schedule).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic evaluation detected a significant percentage of PDDIs requiring an intervention in HIV patients on ART. Monitoring and advice about drug-drug interactions should be part of routine practice.

Analysis of self-reported adverse reactions to efavirenz and drug interactions in a population with HIV in Mexico

Objective

To analyse the most frequent self-reported adverse reactions (ARs), the durability and the causes of antiretrovirals (ARVs) regimens change, concomitant treatments and drug interactions related to the use of ARVs in a group of people living with HIV in Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional study conducted in a clinic specialising in HIV 'CAPASITS-Cuernavaca' in Mexico from February to June 2015. People who wanted to participate were given a questionnaire on demographic characteristics, adherence, concomitant treatments and ARs. To understand the clinical variables, the clinical records were reviewed. Quantitative variables were compared using Student's t-test for normal data and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal data. For comparisons between categorical variables, the χ² test was used. All tests used a significance level of 0.05.

Results

A total of 96 people participated, and 218 ARs (mean= 2.3±1.9) were found. The most frequently encountered ARs were dizziness (53.1%), insomnia (21.9%) and lucid dreams (17.7%). Twenty-three people (24%) were polymedicated, and 18 potential interactions were detected in 12 people.

Conclusions

The results suggest that a thorough analysis of the possible drug interactions should be performed for polymedicated people on ARV treatment and that a protocol should be designed for the monitoring and management of AR to ensure a good adherence to ARV treatment.