Value of EZSCAN parameters for diabetes screening in Chinese

Role of the physical fitness test in risk prediction of diabetes among municipal in-service personnel in Guangxi

To explore the relationship between risk prediction of diabetes mellitus (DM) and different physical fitness parameters in municipal in-service personnel in Guangxi.This was a cross-sectional study conducted in China from July 2015 to December 2016. We enrolled in-service adults (20-65 year of age) from public institutions. All subjects underwent National Physical Fitness Test (NPFT) and EZSCAN screening.The 5668 subjects were 42.9±12.3 years; 2984 (52.6%) were male; 3998 (70.5%), 1579 (27.9%) and 85 (1.6%) were Han, Zhuang, and other ethnicities, respectively. The multivariable analysis showed that systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR] = 1.013, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.022, P = .01), Harvard step test index (OR = 0.958, 95% CI: 0.941-0.976, P <.001), bend-ahead in sitting (OR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.926-0.963, P <.001), hand grip strength (OR = 0.981, 95% CI: 0.966-0.997, P = .02), vertical jump height (OR = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.944-0.996, P = .02), time of single-leg standing with eyes closed (OR = 0.981, 95% CI: 0.968-0.995, P = .007), choice reaction time (OR = 2.103, 95% CI: 1.261-3.507, P = .004), and body composition minerals (OR = 1.649, 95% CI: 1.261-1.813, P < .001) were independently associated with DM. The resulting equation for the prediction of DM had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.808, indicating good predictive ability.NPFT and EZSCAN could help predict the risk of diabetes and give early warnings to undertake preventive actions such as changing diet and performing physical activity.

EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The EZSCAN is a non-invasive device that, by evaluating sweat gland function, may detect subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies assessing the performance of the EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We searched for observational studies including diagnostic accuracy and performance results assessing EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM. OVID (Medline, Embase, Global Health), CINAHL and SCOPUS databases, plus secondary resources, were searched until March 29, 2017. The following keywords were utilized for the systematic searching: type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, EZSCAN, SUDOSCAN, and sudomotor function. Two investigators extracted the information for meta-analysis and assessed the quality of the data using the Revised Version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. Pooled estimates were obtained by fitting the logistic-normal random-effects model without covariates but random intercepts and using the Freeman-Tukey Arcsine Transformation to stabilize variances. Heterogeneity was also assessed using the I2 measure. Four studies (n = 7,720) were included, three of them used oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard. Using Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic model, summary sensitivity was 72.0% (95%CI: 60.0%- 83.0%), whereas specificity was 56.0% (95%CI: 38.0%- 74.0%). Studies were very heterogeneous (I2 for sensitivity: 79.2% and for specificity: 99.1%) regarding the inclusion criteria and bias was present mainly due to participants selection.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM seems to be acceptable, but evidence of high heterogeneity and participant selection bias was detected in most of the studies included. More studies are needed to evaluate the performance of the EZSCAN for undiagnosed T2DM screening, especially at the population level.