The Effect of Registration Surrogate and Patient Factors on the Interobserver Variability of Electronic Portal Image Guidance During Prostate Radiotherapy

Quantification of interobserver variability in image registration using cone beam CT for partial bladder radiotherapy-a comparison between lipiodol and bladder wall surface

OBJECTIVE:

The use of lipiodol or bladder wall surface (BWS) for image guidance has improved the treatment quality for partial bladder irradiation. Currently, this procedure is manually performed by different users. This study assessed the interobserver variability of using image guidance for partial bladder irradiation.

METHODS:

7 observers were prospectively recruited to manually register 5 cone beam CTs (CBCT) from each of 20 bladder cancer patients with lipiodol injected for tumor demarcation. Lipiodol and BWS were used to register the CBCT to pre-treatment reference images, and displacement values in three directions were collected. Mean difference among observers and the 95% limit of agreement were calculated to measure interobserver variability. Margin required and the resultant treatment volume were compared between the surrogates.

RESULTS:

A total of 4200 displacement values were collected for analysis. Lipiodol was superior to BWS, with a mean difference among observers of <2 mm and a 95% limit of agreement of <5 mm in all directions. Of the three directions, greatest variability was observed in the superior-inferior direction for both surrogates, hence requiring a larger margin than the other two directions. After applying the corresponding margin, the mean volume of BWS-planning target volume was calculated to be significantly larger than lipiodol-planning target volume (166 cm3vs 134 cm3, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of lipiodol achieved a higher interobserver agreement than BWS. A larger margin in the superior-inferior direction is recommended due to greater interobserver variability observed in this direction for both surrogates.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

The uncertainty associated with the image registration by multiple observers for bladder image-guided radiotherapy is quantified for two surrogates.

Interobserver variability of radiation therapists aligning to fiducial markers for prostate radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

As the use of fiducial markers (FMs) for the localisation of the prostate during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has become part of routine practice, radiation therapists (RTs) have become increasingly responsible for online image interpretation. The aim of this investigation was to quantify the limits of agreement (LoA) between RTs when localising to FMs with orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) imaging.

METHODS

Six patients receiving prostate EBRT utilising FMs were included in this study. Treatment localisation was performed using kV imaging prior to each fraction. Online stereoscopic assessment of FMs, performed by the treating RTs, was compared with the offline assessment by three RTs. Observer agreement was determined by pairwise Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Stereoscopic analysis of 225 image pairs was performed online at the time of treatment, and offline by three RT observers. Eighteen pairwise Bland-Altman analyses were completed to assess the level of agreement between observers. Localisation by RTs was found to be within clinically acceptable 95% LoAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Small differences between RTs, in both the online and offline setting, were found to be within clinically acceptable limits. RTs were able to make consistent and reliable judgements when matching FMs on planar kV imaging.