Evaluation of two intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy devices for irradiating additional and irregularly shaped volumes of breast tissue

Progress and controversies: radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer

Radiation therapy is a critical component of the multidisciplinary management of invasive breast cancer. In appropriately selected patients, radiation not only improves local control, sparing patients the morbidity and distress of local recurrence, but it also improves survival by preventing seeding and reseeding of distant metastases from persistent reservoirs of locoregional disease. In recent years, considerable progress has been made toward improving our ability to select patients most likely to benefit from radiotherapy and to administer treatment in ways that maximize clinical benefit while minimizing toxicity and burden. This article reviews the role of radiation therapy in invasive breast cancer management, both after breast-conserving surgery and after mastectomy. It focuses particularly on emerging evidence that helps to define the clinical situations in which radiotherapy is indicated, the appropriate targets of treatment, and optimal approaches for minimizing both the toxicity and the burden of treatment, all in the context of the evolving surgical and systemic management of this common disease. It includes a discussion of new approaches in breast cancer radiotherapy, including hypofractionation and intensity modulation, as well as a discussion of promising avenues for future research.

Comparison of planning techniques when air/fluid is present using the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) for HDR-based accelerated partial breast irradiation

The presence of air/fluid surrounding implantable devices used for partial breast irradiation may significantly impact dose coverage to at-risk tissue. Of the 67 total patients retrospectively evaluated for this study, 32 (48%) had greater than 1 cc volume of air/fluid extending outside of the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) device surface and were selected for comparison of planning approaches. The planning approaches utilized two different definitions of PTV_EVAL. One definition of a PTV_EVAL (PTV_EVALSAVI) was based on expanding 1 cm beyond the SAVI device only while accounting for the air/fluid using the NSABP Protocol B-39/RTOG Protocol 0413. The second PTV_EVAL definition (PTV_EVALCAV) was based on expanding 1 cm beyond the cavity (SAVI device plus air/fluid volume). The results indicate use of the B-39 formalism to account for air/fluid displacing the PTV_EVAL may overestimate the dose coverage to the at-risk tissue, especially for large contiguous volumes of air/fluid. Using the SAVI device to optimize dose covering the PTV_EVALCAV volume surrounding the cavity improves dosimetric coverage to at-risk tissue by 11.3% and 8.7% for V100 and V90, respectively, while the average V150 and V200 indices for PTV_EVALCAV increased by 9.1 cc and 5.0cc, respectively, and the average maximum rib and skin doses increased by 11.1% and 6.1%, respectively. The maximum skin dose, rib dose, V150, and V200 all met the planning objectives despite any increase in these parameters.