1
|
Li Y, He K, Ma M, Qi X, Bai Y, Liu S, Gao Y, Lyu F, Jia C, Zhao B, Gao X. Using deep learning to model the biological dose prediction on bulky lung cancer patients of partial stereotactic ablation radiotherapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:6540-6550. [PMID: 33012059 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a biological dose prediction model considering tissue bio-reactions in addition to patient anatomy for achieving a more comprehensive evaluation of tumor control and promoting the automatic planning of bulky lung cancer. METHODS A database containing images and partial stereotactic ablation boost radiotherapy (P-SABR) plans of 94 bulky lung cancer patients was studied. Patient-specific parameters of gross tumor boost volume (GTVb), planning gross target volume (PGTV), and identified organs at risk (OARs) were extracted via Numpy and simple ITK. The original dose and structure maps for P-SABR patients were resampled to have a voxel resolution of 3.9 × 3.9 × 3 mm3 . Biological equivalent dose (BED) distributions were reprogrammed based on physical dose volumes. A developed deep learning architecture, Nestnet, was adopted as the training framework. We utilized two approaches for data organization to correlate the structures and BED: (a) BED programming before training model (B-Nestnet); (b) BED programming after the training process (D-B Nestnet). The early-stop mechanism was adopted on the validation set to avoid overfitting. The evaluation criteria of predictive accuracy contain the minimum BED of GTVb and PGTV, the maximum and the mean BED of all targets, BED-volume metrics. For comparison, we also used the original Unet for BED prediction. The absolute differences were statistically analyzed with the paired-samples t test. RESULTS The statistical outcomes demonstrate that D-B Nestnet model predicts biological dose distributions accurately. The average absolute biases of [max, mean] BED for GTVb, PGTV are [2.1%, 3.3%] and [2.1%, 4.7%], respectively. Averaging across most of OARs, the D-B Nestnet model is capable of predicting the errors of the max and mean BED within 6.3% and 6.1%, respectively. While the compared models performed worse with averaged max and mean BED prediction errors surpassing 10% on some specific OARs. CONCLUSIONS The study developed a D-B Nestnet model capable of predicting BED distribution accurately for bulky lung cancer patients in P-SABR. The predicted BED map enables a quick intuitive evaluation of tumor ablation, modification of the ablation range to improve BED of tumor targets, and quality assessment. It represents a major step forward toward automated P-SABR planning on bulky lung cancer in real clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kanghui He
- School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Mingwei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Siwei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenghao Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Zhao
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xianshu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xing Y, Zhang J, Lu L, Li D, Wang Y, Huang S, Li C, Zhang Z, Li J, Meng A. Identification of hub genes of pneumocyte senescence induced by thoracic irradiation using weighted gene co‑expression network analysis. Mol Med Rep 2015; 13:107-16. [PMID: 26572216 PMCID: PMC4686054 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Irradiation commonly causes pneumocyte senescence, which may lead to severe fatal lung injury characterized by pulmonary dysfunction and respiratory failure. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the induction of pneumocyte senescence by irradiation remains to be elucidated. In the present study, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to screen for differentially expressed genes, and to identify the hub genes and gene modules, which may be critical for senescence. A total of 2,916 differentially expressed genes were identified between the senescence and non-senescence groups following thoracic irradiation. In total, 10 gene modules associated with cell senescence were detected, and six hub genes were identified, including B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1, translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70 homolog A, actin filament-associated protein 1, Cd84, Nuf2 and nuclear factor erythroid 2. These genes were markedly associated with cell proliferation, cell division and cell cycle arrest. The results of the present study demonstrated that WGCNA of microarray data may provide further insight into the molecular mechanism underlying pneumocyte senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghua Xing
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Junling Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Lu Lu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Deguan Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Yueying Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Song Huang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Chengcheng Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Zhubo Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Jianguo Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Aimin Meng
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Nankai, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|