Pancreatic cancer planning: Complex conformal vs modulated therapies

Dosimetric comparison of multiple SBRT delivery platforms for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely used for pancreatic cancer. However, there is still a lack of studies comparing the latest SBRT techniques in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate three latest SBRT delivery platforms: CyberKnife (CK), Tomography Radixact (TOMO), and Halcyon volume rotation intensity modulation therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with pancreatic cancer treated with CK were retrospectively analyzed. SBRT plans were designed using Precision and Eclipse software. CK plans were optimized in two forms: fixed collimator (CK-Fixed) and multi-leaf grating collimator (CK-MLC). TOMO plans were designed with 2.5 cm Fixed Jaw, pitch 0.123-0.43 and 4.0 modulation factors in precision system. In Eclipse 15.6 system, photon optimizer (OP) algorithm was used to design the coplanar two-arc Halcyon VMAT. The median radiation dose was 40 Gy (35-45 Gy) in 5 fractions. The effectiveness of clinical treatment was evaluated by comparing the homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) and dose distribution parameters of organs at risk (OAR).

RESULTS

All plans met the limits of clinical target dose and OAR. CK-MLC plans had the lowest maximum dose of 2 cm normal tissue from PTV margin (D2cm), indicating a low risk of peripheral radiation damage. Additionally, the CK-MLC plans had the lowest dose parameters and provided the best protection for the kidney, spinal cord, small intestine, and duodenum, with a paired t-test p < 0.05, indicating a statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

High conformity and adjustability of CK-MLC allowed for precise complex target localization and conformal dose distribution, benefiting tumor treatment while maximally reducing damage to OAR. This study provides valuable dosimetric evidence for SBRT technique selection for pancreatic cancer.

Dosimetric impact of baseline drift in volumetric modulated arc therapy with breath holding

BACKGROUND

We investigated the change of dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) under baseline drift (BD) during breath holding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten VMAT plans recalculated to a static field at a gantry angle of 0° were prepared for measurement with a 2D array device and five original VMAT plans were prepared for measurement with gafchromic films. These measurement approaches were driven by a waveform reproducing breath holding with BD. We considered breath holding times of 15 and 10 s, and BD at four speeds; specifically, BD0 (0 mm/s), BD0.2 (0.2 mm/s), BD0.3 (0.3 mm/s), and BD0.4 (0.4 mm/s). The BD was periodically reproduced from the isocenter along the craniocaudal direction and the shift during breath holding (ShiftBH) ranged 0-6 mm.The dose distribution of BD0.2, BD0.3 and BD0.4 were compared to that of BD0 using gamma analysis with the criterion of 2%/2 mm.

RESULTS

The mean pass rates of each ShiftBH were 99.8% and 98.9% at 0 mm, 96.8% and 99.4% at 2 mm, 94.9% and 98.6% at 3 mm, 91.5% and 98.4% at 4 mm, 70.8% and 94.1% at 4.5 mm, and 55.0% and 83.6% at 6 mm for the array and film measurements, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found significant differences in ShiftBH above 4 mm (ρ < 0.05). Hence, it is recommended that breath holding time should be shortened for patients to preserve the reproducibility of dose distributions.

Variation in accumulated dose of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer due to different beam starting phases

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of different beam starting phases on dosimetric variations in the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and to identify the relationship between plan complexity and the dosimetric impact of interplay effects in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Single and double full-arc VMAT plans were generated for 11 patients. A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was prescribed to cover 50% of the planning target volume. Patient-specific Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiation Therapy plan files were divided into 10 files based on the respiratory phases in four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) simulations. The phase-divided VMAT plans were calculated in consideration of the beam starting phase for each arc and were then combined in the mid-ventilation phase of 4DCT (4D plans). The dose-volumetric parameters were compared with the calculated dose distributions without consideration of the interplay effects (3D plans). Additionally, relationships among plan parameters such as modulation complexity scores, monitor units (MUs), and dose-volumetric parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Dosimetric differences in the median values associated with different beam starting phases were within ± 1.0% and ± 0.2% for the CTV and ± 0.5% and ± 0.9% for the OARs during single and double full-arc VMAT, respectively. Significant differences caused by variations in the beam starting phases were observed only for the dose-volumetric parameters of the CTV during single full-arc VMAT (P < 0.05), associated with moderate or strong correlations between the MUs and the dosimetric differences between the 4D and 3D plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The beam starting phase affected CTV dosimetric variations of single full-arc VMAT. The use of double full-arc VMAT mitigated this problem. However, variation in the dose delivered to OARs was not dependent on the beam starting phase, even for single full-arc VMAT.

Elective nodal irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Analyses of planning feasibility and geometrically driven DVH prediction model

PURPOSE

We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10-mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t-test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV-to-organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility.

RESULTS

Significant dose increases were observed in GI-OARs in SIB-SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI-OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI-OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations.

CONCLUSIONS

SIB-SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic.