Optimal beam margins in linac-based VMAT stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: a Pareto front analysis for liver metastases

Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy: Final Results of a Multi-arm Phase I Trial (DESTROY-2)

AIMS

To present the final results of a phase I trial on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in different extracranial sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The DESTROY-2 trial, planned as a prospective dose escalation study in oligometastatic (one to five lesions) cancer patients relied on the delivery of a single high dose of radiation utilizing high-precision technology. The primary study endpoint was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS-VMAT. The secondary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. All patients consecutively observed at our radiotherapy unit matching the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, other), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty seven lesions in 164 consecutive patients (male/female: 97/67, median age: 68 years; range: 29-92) were treated. The main primary tumors were: prostate cancer (60 patients), colorectal cancer (47 patients), and breast cancer (39 patients). The maximum planned dose level was achieved in all study arms, and the MTD was not exceeded. 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were established as the single-fraction doses for treating lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively. The prescribed BED 2Gyα/β:10 to the planning target volume ranged from 26.4 Gy to 149.6 Gy. Twenty-seven patients (16.5%) experienced grade 1-2 and only one grade 3 acute toxicity, which was a pulmonary one. In terms of late toxicity, we registered only 5 toxicity>G2: a G3 gastro-intestinal one, three G3 bone toxicity, and a G3 laryngeal toxicity. The overall response was available for 199 lesions: 107 complete response (53.8%), 50 partial response (25.1%), and 31 stable disease (15.6%), leading to an overall response rate of 94.5%. Progression was registered only in 11 cases (5.5%). The overall response rate in each arm ranged from 88.6% to 96.4%. The overall two-year local control, distant metastasis free survival, disease free survival, and overall survival were 81.7%, 33.0%, 25.4%, and 78.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the planned doses of 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were successfully administered as single-fractions for the treatment of lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively, in a prospective SRS dose-escalation trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were registered, and minimal acute and late toxicity were reported. New indications for SRS are currently being studied in oligoprogressive patients receiving targeted drugs or in combination with immunotherapy. The DESTROY-2 trial represents, in our opinion, a credible starting point for future modern radiosurgery trials.

A method for adjusting MLC leaf positions outside a reference region for VMAT plans in a commercial treatment planning system

Multileaf collimators (MLC) leaf positions in a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan is determined from inverse treatment planning process. On the isocenter plane, leaf projections should not be set too far out of projected PTV boundary. In this study we developed an automatic method of adjusting leaf positions outside a reference region of interest (ROI) for VMAT plans generated in Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS). The proposed method consisted of a Pinnacle script and a Python program. It checked each MLC leaf position for all control points in a VMAT arc relative to a reference ROI created by adding a small margin to PTV. For leaves opened outside the reference ROI, the method adjusted their positions to reduce dose to normal tissue while maintaining PTV coverage and satisfying leaf position constraints. The deliverability and dose accuracy of the method was verified by applying it to 15 VMAT plans which were delivered in five different linacs in our department. Dosimetric improvement of the proposed method was analyzed for another group of 16 randomly selected VMAT plans. The average gamma passing rate using a 3%/3 mm criteria for the verification group of VMAT plans was 98.3% and all passing rates were above our internal passing threshold. Dosimetric improvement was observed for the evaluation group of VMAT plans. The method can improve normal tissue protection for VMAT plans. It can be safely applied in routine clinic work.

Investigating variation of dose gradient index by different grid sizes in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of optic nerve sheath meningioma

In optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) radiotherapy, vital organs with a low tolerance dose are very close to the target volume. Thus dose fall-off steepness around the target volume is the most critical parameter in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning for this malignancy. We hypothesized that one of the parameters that can impact the dose fall-off steepness is dose calculation grid sizes. This study aimed to assess the impact of different dose calculation grid sizes on the newly introduced dose gradient indices (DGIs) for the steepness of dose fall-off around the target volume. Results showed that decreasing the dose calculation grid size in IMRT treatment planning of ONSM patients had a significant difference in the dosimetric parameters and DGIs of the target volume and at-risk organs. This study demonstrates that using a finer dose calculation grid size is preferred in treating ONSM patients.

Stereobody radiotherapy for nodal recurrences in oligometastatic patients: a pooled analysis from two phase I clinical trials

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to achieve high local control rates in limited metastatic burden of disease. Few papers reported on the efficacy of SBRT in nodal oligometastases. The primary aim of the present paper was to analyze the treatment outcome in this setting. Data from DESTROY-1 and SRS-DESTROY-2 phase I clinical trials were reviewed and analyzed. These trials were based on a 5 fractions and a single fraction regimens, respectively. End-points of this analysis were toxicity rates, overall response rate (ORR), and local control (LC). Patients treated between December 2003 and January 2018, with any metastatic site, and primary tumor type and histology were included. One hundred-eighty-one patients (M/F: 93/88; median age: 67, range 37-88) treated with SBRT on 253 nodal lesions were analyzed. Initially, the used technique was 3D-CRT (20.9%), while subsequently treatments were delivered by VMAT (79.1%). The total dose to the PTV ranged between 12 Gy/single fraction to 50 Gy/5 fractions. With a median follow-up of 21 months (2-124), no grade 3 acute or late toxicity was recorded. ORR based on functional imaging was 92.5% with a complete response rate of 76%. Two- and three-year actuarial LC were 81.6% and 76.0%, respectively. Our large pooled analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of SBRT/SRS in patients with nodal metastases and identifies clinical and treatment variables able to predict complete response and local control rate.

Partially ablative radiotherapy (PAR) for large mass tumors using simultaneous integrated boost: A dose-escalation feasibility study

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the feasibility to plan and deliver highly heterogeneous doses to symptomatic large tumors using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) during a short course palliative accelerated radiotherapy.

Methods

A patient with a large symptomatic chordoma infiltrating the right gluteal region was selected. A modified SIB treatment was implemented to irradiate the central volume of the tumor (boost target volume, BTV) up to 10 Gy/fraction in a dose escalation trial while maintaining the remaining tumor volume (planning target volume, PTV) and the surrounding healthy tissues within 5 Gy/fraction in twice daily fractions for two consecutive days. Four SIB plans were generated in the dual‐arc modality; a basal dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the PTV, while the BTV was boosted up to 40 Gy. For comparison purposes, plans obtained with a sequential boost (SEQ plans) were also generated. All plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose to the targets. Dose contrast index (DCI), conformity index (CI), integral dose (ID), and the irradiated body volumes at 5, 10, and 20 Gy were evaluated.

Results

At equal targets coverage, SIB plans provided major improvement in DCI, CI, and ID with respect to SEQ plans. When BTV dose escalated up to 200% of PTV prescription, DCI resulted in 66% for SIB plans and 37% for SEQ plans; the ID increase was only 11% for SIB plans (vs 27% for SEQ plans) and the increase in healthy tissues receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy was less than 2%. Pretreatment dose verification reported a γ‐value passing rate greater than 95% with 3%(global)‐2 mm.

Conclusion

A modified SIB technique is dosimetrically feasible for large tumors, where doses higher than the tolerance dose of healthy tissues are necessary to increase the therapeutic gain.