1
|
Monteiro RV, Lins RBE, Lima RBW, Fischer K, De Souza GM. Preventive and restorative alternatives to caries by irradiation: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:327. [PMID: 38702458 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08522-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study is to conduct a comprehensive scoping review to map scientific evidence and clarify concepts regarding the commonly recommended preventive and restorative dental treatments for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC) and subjected to radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This systematic scoping review was performed under the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The study's experimental design was registered in the Open Science Framework. In vitro studies that evaluated preventive and restorative dental treatment over 50 Gy radiation doses were included. The search was conducted in November 2023 in five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) without language or date restriction. A search strategy was applied based on keywords, MeSh terms, or synonyms. A descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS A total of 49 studies, out of 3679 original articles identified, were included and reviewed. Of the included studies, three evaluated saliva stimulants and 35 evaluated fluoride-based preventive materials: gel (n = 18) toothpaste (n = 11) mouth rinse (n = 8) and varnish (n = 5) while 14 evaluated restorative materials: resin composite (n = 12) glass ionomer cement (n = 6) and amalgam (n = 1) Of those studies, 36 were clinical trials and 13 were in vitro studies. CONCLUSION Fluoride gel was the most frequently recommended preventive material for preventing radiation caries with supportive clinical evidence. Resin composite and glass ionomer were the most frequently used restorative materials, respectively. However, there is not yet clinical evidence to support the use of resin composite in irradiated teeth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata V Monteiro
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, 501 S Preston St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
| | - Rodrigo B E Lins
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas, Lourival Melo Mota Ave, Maceió, Alagoas, 57072-900, Brazil
| | - Renally B W Lima
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba, I Lot. Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, Paraíba, 58051-900, Brazil
| | - Kathleen Fischer
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, 501 S Preston St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA
| | - Grace M De Souza
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, 501 S Preston St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong YM, Koh CWY, Lew KS, Chua CGA, Yeap PL, Andrew W, Zubin M, Poh SS, Lew WS, Lee JCL, Park SY, Tan HQ. Effects of modern aesthetic dental fillings on proton therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100552. [PMID: 38405428 PMCID: PMC10891317 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose High-density dental fillings pose a non-negligible impact on head and neck cancer treatment. For proton therapy, stopping power ratio (SPR) prediction will be significantly impaired by the associated image artifacts. Dose perturbation is also inevitable, compromising the treatment plan quality. While plenty of work has been done on metal or amalgam fillings, none has touched on composite resin (CR) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) which have seen an increasing usage. Hence, this work aims to provide a detailed characterisation of SPR and dose perturbation in proton therapy caused by CR and GIC. Materials and methods Four types of fillings were used: CR, Fuji Bulk (FB), Fuji II (FII) and Fuji IX (FIX). The latter three belong to GIC category. Measured SPR were compared with SPR predicted using single-energy computed tomography (SECT) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Dose perturbation of proton beams with lower- and higher-energy levels was also quantified using Gafchromic films. Results The measured SPR for CR, FB, FII and FIX were 1.68, 1.77, 1.77 and 1.76, respectively. Overall, DECT could predict SPR better than SECT. The lowest percentage error achieved by DECT was 19.7 %, demonstrating the challenge in estimating SPR, even for fillings with relatively lower densities. For both proton beam energies and all four fillings of about 4.5 mm thickness, the maximum dose perturbation was 3 %. Conclusion This study showed that dose perturbation by CR and GIC was comparatively small. We have measured and recommended the SPR values for overriding the fillings in TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Ming Wong
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Wibawa Andrew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Master Zubin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sharon Shuxian Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen Siang Lew
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - James Cheow Lei Lee
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang YY, Yang J, Liu YB. Planning issues on linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:12822-12836. [PMID: 36568990 PMCID: PMC9782937 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.12822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This work aims to summarize and evaluate the current planning progress based on the linear accelerator in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The specific techniques include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, dynamic conformal arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). They are all designed to deliver higher doses to the target volume while reducing damage to normal tissues; among them, VMAT shows better prospects for application. This paper reviews and summarizes several issues on the planning of SRT to provide a reference for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Yang Huang
- School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi Province, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014, Henan Province, China
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Yi-Bao Liu
- School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barlaz Us S, Ataol AS, Ergun G. Impact of different fixed dental prostheses on radiation dose in helical tomotherapy as measured with metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2022; 133:716-724. [PMID: 35248513 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This ex vivo study evaluated the effects of different fixed dental prostheses and protective materials on scattered radiation during radiation therapy (RT). STUDY DESIGN Natural teeth (group NT) and 4 types of prostheses (group BL: bilayer lithium disilicate glass-ceramic; group MZ: monolithic zirconia ceramic; group BZ: bilayer zirconia-based all ceramic; and group BM: bilayer metal-ceramic restorations) were examined in maxillary and mandibular arch phantoms. All groups were divided into 3 subgroups: (1) without protective material over the prostheses; (2) protected with a soft acrylic night guard; and (3) protected with polyvinylsiloxane putty. All groups were irradiated with helical RT at 2 Gy and 6 MV photon energy. Doses were measured internally and externally 3 times on each phantom. Results were significant at P < .05. RESULTS No statistically significant differences in doses were found between groups NT and BL in either phantom, but these groups were different from the others. The differences between groups BZ and MZ were insignificant. Doses in group BM were significantly larger than all other groups. No significant differences existed between doses with and without protective material. CONCLUSIONS Doses increased significantly due to scattered radiation from the prostheses with increasing material density. Protective materials had no significant effect on dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songul Barlaz Us
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
| | | | - Gulfem Ergun
- Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khaleghi G, Mahdavi H, Mahdavi SR, Khajetash B, Nikoofar A, Hosntalab M, Sadeghi M, Reiazi R. Investigating dose homogeneity in radiotherapy of oral cancers in the presence of a dental implant system: an in vitro phantom study. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7:90. [PMID: 34486092 PMCID: PMC8419140 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00372-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Materials with high atomic numbers are part of the composition of dental implant systems. In radiotherapy of oral cavity cancers, an implant can cause dose perturbations that affect target definition, dose calculation, and dose distribution. In consequence, this may result in poor tumor control and higher complications. In this study, we evaluated dose homogeneity when a dental implant replaced a normal tooth. We also aimed to evaluate the concordance of dose calculations with dose measurements. Materials and methods In this study, 2 sets of planning CT scans of a phantom with a normal tooth and the same phantom with the tooth replaced by a Z1 TBR dental implant system were used. The implant system was composed of a porcelain-fused-to-metal crown and titanium with a zirconium collar. Three radiotherapy plans were designed when the density of the implant material was corrected to match their elements, or when all were set to the density of water, or when using the default density conversion. Gafchromic EBT-3 films at the level of isocenter and crowns were used for measurements. Results At the level of crowns, upstream and downstream dose calculations were reduced when metal kernels were applied (M-plan). Moreover, relatively measured dose distribution patterns were most similar to M-plan. At this level, relative to the non-implanted phantom, mean doses values were higher with the implant (215.93 vs. 192.25), also, new high-dose areas appeared around a low-dose streak forward to the implant (119% vs. 95%). Conclusions Implants can cause a high dose to the oral cavity in radiotherapy because of extra scattered radiation. Knowledge of the implant dimensions and defining their material enhances the accuracy of calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goli Khaleghi
- Medical Radiation Engineering Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Daneshgah Blvd., Simon Bolivar Blvd., P.O. Box: 14515-775, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hoda Mahdavi
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, P.O. Box: 14665-354, Tehran, Iran. .,Radiation Oncology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar hospital, Beh-Afarin St., Karimkhane-Zand Blvd., P.O. Box: 1593747811, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Seied Rabi Mahdavi
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, P.O. Box: 14665-354, Tehran, Iran.,Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, P.O. Box: 14155-6183, Tehran, Iran
| | - Benyamin Khajetash
- Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, P.O. Box: 14155-6183, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Nikoofar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar hospital, Beh-Afarin St., Karimkhane-Zand Blvd., P.O. Box: 1593747811, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hosntalab
- Medical Radiation Engineering Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Daneshgah Blvd., Simon Bolivar Blvd., P.O. Box: 14515-775, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Sadeghi
- Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, P.O. Box: 14155-6183, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Reiazi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, 101 College Street, P.O. Box: M5G 1L7, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|