1
|
Frank SJ, Das IJ, Simone CB, Davis BJ, Deville C, Liao Z, Lo SS, McGovern SL, Parikh RR, Reilly M, Small W, Schechter NR. ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2024; 13:100021. [PMID: 39347377 PMCID: PMC11437389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This practice parameter for the performance of proton beam radiation therapy was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Radium Society (ARS). This practice parameter was developed to serve as a tool in the appropriate application of proton therapy in the care of cancer patients or other patients with conditions in which radiation therapy is indicated. It addresses clinical implementation of proton radiation therapy, including personnel qualifications, quality assurance (QA) standards, indications, and suggested documentation. Materials and Methods This practice parameter for the performance of proton beam radiation therapy was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters - Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Results The qualifications and responsibilities of personnel, such as the proton center Chief Medical Officer or Medical Director, Radiation Oncologist, Radiation Physicist, Dosimetrist and Therapist, are outlined, including the necessity for continuing medical education. Proton therapy standard clinical indications and methodologies of treatment management are outlined by disease site and treatment group (e.g. pediatrics) including documentation and the process of proton therapy workflow and equipment specifications. Additionally, this proton therapy practice parameter updates policies and procedures related to a quality assurance and performance improvement program (QAPI), patient education, infection control, and safety. Conclusion As proton therapy becomes more accessible to cancer patients, policies and procedures as outlined in this practice parameter will help ensure quality and safety programs are effectively implemented to optimize clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J. Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Indra J. Das
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | | | | | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Simon S. Lo
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Susan L. McGovern
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rahul R. Parikh
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | | | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maguire Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tilbæk S, Petersen SE, Stolarczyk L, Vestergaard A, Rønde HS, Bentzen LN, Søndergaard J, Høyer M, Muren LP. Plan robustness evaluation strategies in whole-pelvic proton therapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients within a randomised clinical trial. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1455-1460. [PMID: 37773941 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2261621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inter-fractional anatomical changes challenge robust delivery of whole-pelvic proton therapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Pre-treatment robust evaluation (PRE) takes uncertainties in isocenter shifts and distal beam edge in treatment plans into account. Using weekly control computed tomography scans (cCTs), the aim of this study was to evaluate the PRE strategy by comparing to an off-line during-treatment robust evaluation (DRE) while also assessing plan robustness with respect to protocol planning constraints. MATERIAL AND METHODS Treatment plans and cCTs from ten patients included in the pilot phase of the PROstate PROTON Trial 1 were analysed. Treatment planning followed protocol guidelines with 78 Gy to the primary clinical target volume (CTVp) and 56 Gy to the elective target (CTVe) in 39 fractions. Recalculations of the treatment plans were performed for a total of 64 cCTs and dose/volume measures corresponding to clinical constraints were evaluated for this DRE against the simulated scenario interval from the PRE. RESULTS Of the 64 cCTs, 59 showed DRE CTVp measures within the robustness range from the PRE; this was also the case for 39 of the cCTs for the CTVe measures. However, DRE CTVe coverage was still within constraints for 57 of the 64 cCTs. DRE dose/volume measures for CTVp fulfilled target coverage constraints in 59 of 64 cCTs. All DRE measures for the rectum, bladder, and bowel were inside the PRE range in 63, 39, and 31 cCTs, respectively. CONCLUSION The PRE strategy predicted the DRE scenarios for CTVp and rectum. CTVe, bladder, and bowel showed more complex anatomical variations than simulated by the PRE isocenter shift. Both original and recalculated nominal treatment plans showed robust treatment delivery in terms of target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Tilbæk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Heidi S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lise N Bentzen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jimmi Søndergaard
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bryant CM, Henderson RH, Nichols RC, Mendenhall WM, Hoppe BS, Vargas CE, Daniels TB, Choo CR, Parikh RR, Giap H, Slater JD, Vapiwala N, Barrett W, Nanda A, Mishra MV, Choi S, Liao JJ, Mendenhall NP. Consensus Statement on Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:1-16. [PMID: 34722807 PMCID: PMC8489490 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00031.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a promising but controversial treatment in the management of prostate cancer. Despite its dosimetric advantages when compared with photon radiation therapy, its increased cost to patients and insurers has raised questions regarding its value. Multiple prospective and retrospective studies have been published documenting the efficacy and safety of proton therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and for patients requiring adjuvant or salvage pelvic radiation after surgery. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Genitourinary Subcommittee intends to address current proton therapy indications, advantages, disadvantages, and cost effectiveness. We will also discuss the current landscape of clinical trials. This consensus report can be used to guide clinical practice and research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Curtis M. Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Randal H. Henderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - R. Charles Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - C. Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rahul R. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jerry D. Slater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Barrett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Akash Nanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Mark V. Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Seungtaek Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay J. Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nancy P. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|