Patient-specific radiotherapy quality assurance for estimating actual treatment dose

Evaluation of the trend of set-up errors during the treatment period using set-up margin in prostate radiotherapy

Accurate information on set-up error during radiotherapy is essential for determining the optimal number of treatments in hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. This necessitates careful control by the radiotherapy staff to assess the patient's condition. This study aimed to develop an evaluation method of the temporal trends in a patient's specific prostate movement during treatment using image matching and margin values. This study included 65 patients who underwent prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (mean treatment time, 87.2 s). Set-up errors were assessed using bone, inter-, and intra-fraction marker matching across 39 fractions. The set-up margin was determined by dividing the four periods into 39 fractions using Stroom's formula and correlation coefficient. The intra-fraction set-up error was biased in the anterior-superior (AS) direction during treatment. The temporal trend of set-up errors during radiotherapy slightly increased based on bone matching and inter-fraction marker matching, with a 1.6-mm difference in the set-up margin fractions 11 to 20. The correlation coefficient of the mean prostate movement during treatment significantly decreased in the superior-inferior direction, while remaining high in the left-right and anterior-posterior directions. Image matching contributed significantly to the improvement of set-up errors; however, careful attention is needed for prostate movement in the AS direction, particularly during short treatment times. Understanding the trend of set-up errors during the treatment period is essential in numerical information sharing on patient condition and evaluating the margins for tailored hypo-fractionated radiotherapy, considering the facility's image-guided radiation therapy technology.

Evaluation of patient-specific motion management for radiotherapy planning computed tomography using a statistical method

We evaluated the probabilistic randomness of predictions by using individual numerical data based on general data for treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and evaluated the importance of patient-specific management through statistical analysis of our facility's data in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The subjects were 30 patients who underwent lung SBRT with fiducial markers and 24 patients who underwent prostate VMAT. The average 3-dimensional (3D) displacement error between the fiducial marker and lung mass in 4DCT of lung SBRT was calculated and then compared with the 3D displacement error between the upper-lobe group (UG) and middle- or lower-lobe group (LG). The duty cycles between the lung tumor and fiducial marker at the <2-mm³ ambush area were compared between the UG and LG. In the prostate VMAT, the Shewhart control chart was analyzed by comparing multiple acquisition planning CT (MPCT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) during the treatment period. The average 3D displacement errors in 4DCT for the lung tumor and fiducial marker were significantly different between the UG and middle- or lower-lobe group, but there was no correlation with the duty cycle. The Shewhart control chart for 3D displacement errors of the prostate for MPCT and CBCT showed that errors of >8 mm exceeded the control limit. In lung SBRT and prostate VMAT, overall statistical data from planning CT showed probabilistic randomness in predictions during the treatment period, and patient-specific motion management was needed to increase accuracy. A radiotherapy planning CT report showing a statistical analysis graph would be useful to objective share with staff.

Development of a novel detection method for changes in lung conditions during radiotherapy using a temporal subtraction technique

We aimed to develop a novel method of detecting changes in lung conditions during radiotherapy using temporal subtraction technique. Twenty patients who underwent radiotherapy were retrospectively assessed by calculating optimal direct similarity error (ODSE) between initial and mid-treatment registered images. Patients were grouped according to region in tumor size and atelectasis for lung of < 20 or ≥ 20 cm³, which analyzed two field regions (1024 × 768 pixels, 512 × 512 pixels). Correlations between ODSE and changes in lung conditions were analyzed based on effect of radiation dose; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate whether changes can be detected during treatment period. The ODSE of 1024 × 768 pixels was changed to 1.00 (0.28-3.48) for lung lesion size of < 20 cm³ and 1.86 (0.55-6.58) for the ≥ 20 cm³ lung lesion size. ODSE of 512 × 512 pixels was 1.03 (0.40-2.12) for the region in tumor size and atelectasis of < 20 cm³ and 1.90 (0.39-27.8) for the ≥ 20 cm³ lung lesion size. The region under the curve values from ROC analysis were 0.796 (1024 × 768 pixels) and 0.983 (512 × 512 pixels). A novel method can visually and numerically help to detect changes in lung condition at early treatment stages. Using this method, difference between plan and actual positional relationship for target and risk organs that cannot be predicted at the time of planning can be avoided, ensuring high safety and accuracy in lung radiotherapy.