The spatial accuracy of ring-mounted halcyon linac versus C-arm TrueBeam linac for single-isocenter/multi-target SBRT treatment

Stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumor beds on a ring-mounted Halcyon LINAC

PURPOSE

This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the Halcyon Ring Delivery System (RDS) for delivering stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments for intracranial tumors beds.

METHODS

Ten previously treated brain SRT patients for 30 Gy in five fractions with non-coplanar HyperArc plans on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) were replanned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF) using the same number of arcs and Eclipse's AcurosXB dose engine. Plan quality evaluation metrics per SRT protocol included: PTV coverage, GTV dose (minimum and mean), target conformity indices (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), maximum dose 2 cm away from the PTV (D2cm), and doses to organs-at-risk (OAR). Additionally, patient-specific quality assurance (QA) results and beam-on-time (BOT) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The Halcyon RDS provided highly conformal SRT plans for intracranial tumor beds with similar dose to target. When benchmarked against clinically delivered HyperArc plans, target coverage, CI(s) and HI were statistically similar. The Halcyon plans saw no statistical difference in maximum OAR doses to the brainstem, spinal cord, and cochlea. Due to the machine's coplanar geometry, the Halcyon plans showed a decrease in optic pathway dose (0.75 Gy vs. 2.08 Gy, p = 0.029). Overall, Halcyon's coplanar geometry resulted in a larger GI (3.33 vs. 2.72, p = 0.008) and a larger D2cm (39.59% vs. 29.07%, p < 0.001). In this cohort, multiple cases had the PTV and the optic pathway in the same axial plane. In one such instance, the PTV was <2 cm away from the optic pathway but even at this close proximity OAR, Halcyon still adequately spared the optic pathway. Additionally, the Halcyon's geometry provided slightly larger amount of normal brain dose receiving 24.4 Gy (8.99 cc vs. 7.36 cc) and 28.8 Gy (2.9 cc vs. 2.5 cc), although statistically insignificant. The Halcyon plans achieved similar delivery accuracy, quantified by patient-specific QA results evaluated with a 2%/2 mm gamma criteria (99.42% vs. 99.70%). For both plans, independent Monte Carlo second checks calculation agreed within 1%. Average Halcyon BOT was slightly higher by 0.35 min (p = 0.045), however, due to the one-step patient set-up and verification overall estimated treatment times on Halcyon were lower compared to HyperArc treatments (7.61 min vs. 10.26 min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When benchmarked against clinically delivered HyperArc treatments, the Halcyon brain SRT plans provided similar plan quality and delivery accuracy but achieved faster overall treatment times. We have started treating select brain SRT patients on the Halcyon RDS for patients having tumor beds greater than 1 cm in diameter with the closest OAR distance of greater than 2 cm away from the target. We recommend other clinics to consider commissioning SRT treatments on their Halcyon systems-allowing including remote Halcyon-only clinics to provide exceptionally high-quality therapeutic brain SRT treatments to an otherwise underserved patient cohort.

Feasibility of a Single-Fraction Stereotactic Dose of 30 Gy to Solitary Lung Lesions on Halcyon

Purpose We sought to explore the feasibility of using the current co-planar Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS) with a novel multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture shape controller in delivering a single high dose of 30 Gy to solitary lung lesions via stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods Thirteen non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a single dose of 30 Gy to lung lesions via SBRT on the TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs were anonymized and replanned onto the Halcyon RDS (6MV-FFF) following RTOG-0915 single-fraction criteria. The Halcyon plans utilized a novel dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based MLC-fitting approach before VMAT optimization with a user-defined aperture shape controller option. The clinical TrueBeam and Halcyon plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity, gradient index, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Treatment delivery efficacy and accuracy were assessed through end-to-end quality assurance (QA) tests on Halcyon and independent dose verification via in-house Monte Carlo (MC) second-check validation. Results All Halcyon lung SBRT plans met RTOG-0915 protocol's requirements for target coverage, conformity, and gradient indices, and maximum dose 2 cm away from the target (D2cm) while being statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) when compared to clinical TrueBeam plans. Additionally, Halcyon provided a similar dose to OAR except for the ribs, where Halcyon demonstrated a lower maximum dose (15.22 Gy vs 17.01 Gy, p < 0.001). However, Halcyon plans required a higher total monitor unit (8892 MU vs 7413 MU, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher beam modulation factor (2.96 MU/cGy vs 2.47 MU/cGy, p < 0.001) and an increase in beam-on time by a factor of 2.1 (11.11 min vs 5.3 min, p < 0.005). End-to-end QA measurements demonstrate that Halcyon plans were clinically acceptable with an average gamma passing rate of 99.8% for 2%/2mm criteria and independent MC 2nd checks within ±2.86%. Conclusion Our end-to-end testing and validation study demonstrates that by utilizing a DCA-based MLC aperture shape controller before VMAT optimization, Halcyon can be used for delivering a single dose of lung SBRT treatment. However, future improvements of Halcyon RDS are recommended to allow higher output rates, rotational couch corrections, and an integrated intrafraction motion management system that will further enhance Halcyon's capability for site-specific single dosage of SBRT.