Suitability of DCPs with Screw Locking Elements to allow sufficient interfragmentary motion to promote secondary bone healing of osteoporotic fractures

Biomechanical investigation of tibial tubercle osteotomy fixed with various screw configurations

INTRODUCTION

To date, the effects of various screw configurations on the stability of tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) are not completely understood. Hence, the first aim of this study is to evaluate the stability of TTO under various screw configurations. The second aim is to evaluate the internal stresses in the bone and the contact forces on the bone fragment that are developed by the tibia and screws in response to the applied load after the equilibrant is revealed.

METHODS

To calculate the biomechanical responses of the bone and screw under loading, finite element (FE) method was used in this study. Six types of screw configurations were studied in the simulation: two parallel horizontal screws placed at a 20 mm interval, two parallel horizontal screws placed at a 30 mm interval, two parallel upward screws, two parallel downward screws, two trapezoid screws, and two divergent screws. The displacement of the bone fragment, contact forces on the fragment, and the internal stress in the bone were used as indices for comparison.

RESULTS

Among all configurations, the configuration of two parallel downward screws yielded the highest stability with the lowest fragment displacement and gap opening. Although the maximum displacement of the TTO with the configuration of two parallel horizontal screws was slightly higher than that of the downward configuration, the difference was only 0.2 mm. The configuration of two upward screws resulted in the highest fragment displacement and gap deformation between the fragment and tibia. The stress of the osteotomized bone fragment was highest with the configuration of two upward screws.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present model, the current configuration of two parallel horizontal screws is recommended for TTO. If this is inappropriate in a specific clinical scenario, then the downward screw configuration may be used as an alternative. By contrast, the configuration of two parallel upward screws is least suggested for the fixation of TTO.

Influence of the number and position of stripped screws on plate-screw construct biomechanical properties

INTRODUCTION

Screw stripping is a common situation in fracture fixation, particularly in osteopenic bone treatment. Surgeons' perception of screw stripping is relatively poor and the real number of loose screws in every plate-screw construct is unknown. The biomechanical and clinical implications of the different possible screw-stripping situations are also unidentified. In this study, construct stiffness in different scenarios of stripped screws is investigated.

METHOD

A bone surrogate comminuted osteoporotic fracture was fixed with four screws in both sides of the fracture gap in 75 specimens. In four groups, one or two screws closest or distal to the gap were over-tightened and left in place in one part of the construct and the remaining screws were tightened with 0.3N m torque (four groups). In the fifth group (control), all the screws were tightened with 0.3N m torque. Construct stiffness was tested in terms of compression, bending, and torsion for 1000 cycles.

RESULTS

When one or two screws closest to the gap were stripped, stiffness only decreased by, respectively, 5.7% or 7.6% under compression and 4.7% or 6.7% under bending; however, stiffness in torsion was 15.1% or 32%, respectively, lower than the initial stiffness. When a screw distal to the gap was stripped, the stiffness decreased by 28% under bending and 10% under compression; no change was noted under torsion. When two screws distal to the gap were stripped, the stiffness decreased by 11% in compression, collapsed under bending, and decreased by 8% under torsion.

CONCLUSIONS

Position and number of stripped screws affect the biomechanical properties of a construct in different ways, depending on the acting forces.

Use of screw locking elements improves radiological and biomechanical results of femoral osteotomies

BACKGROUND

Dynamic compression plate (DCP) constructs provide inadequate fixation in cases of poor bone quality and early weight-bearing. Screw locking elements (SLE) are flat locking nuts placed at the end of the screw to prevent screw stripping from the bone, improving fixation stability. The purpose of this work was to compare biomechanical and radiological evaluations of femoral ovine osteotomies fixed using DCP constructs with and without SLE.

METHOD

A dyaphyseal femoral osteotomy was performed in sixteen adult sheep and fixed with a DCP and cortical screws. Half of the animals were operated on with a SLE on each side of the osteotomy and the rest without the addition of SLE. Four animals of each group were euthanized after 8 weeks, and the remaining after 16 weeks. Both femora of each animal were radiographed and mechanically tested in torsion.

RESULTS

Radiologically femoral malalignment or screw loosening was observed in six out of the eight animals operated on without SLE. In contrast, all animals subjected to the operation with SLE showed complete radiological consolidation of the osteotomy. Seven of these eight animals showed normal femoral alignment and no osteosynthesis failure. Stiffness of the bones fixed with SLE was among 145% and 177% the value of their contralateral non-operated femurs (all animals of this group showed greater stiffness on the operated bone than its contralateral non-operated femur). However, stiffness of the bones operated on without SLE was among 58% and 87% the value of the stiffness of their contralateral non-operated bone (all animals of this group showed greater stiffness on the non-operated bone than the osteotomized ones).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SLE avoided loosening of the system and stimulated stronger osteotomy consolidation. Clinical application of this improved system may thus be a feasible and cost-effective alternative to other more rigid and expensive bone fixation techniques.

Experimental analysis of the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique applied with non-locking screws and screw locking elements

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is an effective surgical technique in the repair of humeral and tibial shaft fractures. There is some controversy as to the minimum number of screws required to ensure correct stability to promote healing, especially when dealing with low quality bones. This work compared different systems assembled on synthetic models simulating a comminuted fracture. Group 1 comprised a locking compression plate with four non-locking screws placed at the holes furthest from the fracture. Group 2 differed from group 1 only in the additional use of two screw locking elements (SLE). Group 3 had four rather than two SLE and, finally, Group 4 used 4 locking screws. The compression and torsion tests with static and cyclic loads showed that, in MIPO, two locking screws or two non-locking screws with SLE could be used per segment without any significant loss in stiffness after 1000 cycles, with system stability guaranteed in both cases. However, lower strength and significant loss of stiffness were observed when non-locking screws were used alone.