A new shoulder model with a biologically inspired glenohumeral joint

Influence of the rotator cuff tear pattern in shoulder stability after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction: a computational analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of the arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in restoring glenohumeral stability in the presence of different preoperative patterns of irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs).

METHODS

A computational musculoskeletal (MSK) model of the upper limb was used to simulate isolated SCR and to estimate the stability of the shoulder. Four patterns of preoperative irreparable RCTs were modeled: Supraspinatus (SSP); SSP ​+ ​Subscapularis (SSC); SSP ​+ ​Infraspinatus (ISP); and SSP ​+ ​SSC ​+ ​ISP. The muscles involved in the irreparable RCT were removed from the MSK model to simulate an irreparable full-thickness tear. In the MSK model, the muscle and joint forces were estimated for a set of upper limb positions, from four types of motions (abduction in the frontal plane, forward flexion in the sagittal plane, reaching behind the back, and combing the hair) collected in a biomechanics laboratory, through inverse dynamic analysis. The stability of the shoulder was estimated based on the tangential and compressive components of the glenohumeral joint reaction force. The comparison of pre- and post-operative conditions, for the four patterns of irreparable RCTs, with the healthy condition, was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests (statistical level of p ​< ​0.05).

RESULTS

In the setting of an isolated irreparable SSP tear, SCR statistically significantly improved stability compared with the preoperative condition (p ​< ​0.001). For the irreparable SSP ​+ ​SSC pattern, a statistically significant loss in stability was observed (p ​< ​0.001) when SCR was applied. For the irreparable SSP ​+ ​ISP and SSP ​+ ​SSC ​+ ​ISP patterns, the postoperative condition increased shoulder stability, compared to the preoperative condition; however, the improvement was not statistically significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Isolated SCR for irreparable RCTs extending beyond the SSP does not statistically significantly improve the stability of the glenohumeral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Effect of subscapularis repair on joint contact forces based on degree of posterior-superior rotator cuff tear severity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) affect the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, the effects of subscapularis repair on the outcomes of RSA, based on the degree of posterior-superior RCTs, are unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of subscapularis repair on three-dimensional joint contact forces (JCFs) based on the degree of posterior-superior RCT severity in RSA. Ten human in vivo experimental data were used as input to the musculoskeletal model. A six-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) anatomical shoulder model was developed and validated against three-dimensional JCFs. The 6-DOF musculoskeletal shoulder model of RSA was then developed by importing the reverse shoulder implant into the validated anatomical shoulder model. Based on the various types of posterior-superior RCT severity, inverse dynamic simulations of subscapularis-torn and subscapularis-repaired models of RSA were performed: from isolated supraspinatus tears to partial or massive tears of the infraspinatus and teres minor. The intact rotator cuff model of RSA was also simulated for comparison with the different types of models. Our results showed that the more posterior-superior RCTs progressed in RSA, the more superior JCFs were observed at 90°, 105°, and 120° abduction in the subscapularis-torn model. However, subscapularis repair decreased the superior JCF at those angles sufficiently. In addition, the teres minor muscle-tendon force increased as infraspinatus bundle tears progressed in both the subscapularis-torn and -repaired models, in order to compensate for the reduced force during abduction. However, the teres minor muscle-tendon force was not as high as that of the infraspinatus muscle-tendon, which could result in muscle force imbalance between repaired subscapularis and teres minor. Therefore, our results suggest that repairing the subscapularis and the repairable infraspinatus during RSA can improve glenohumeral joint stability in the superior-inferior direction by restoring muscle force balance between the anterior cuff (i.e., subscapularis) and posterior cuff (i.e., infraspinatus and teres minor). The findings of this study can help clinician decide whether to repair the rotator cuff during RSA to enhance joint stability.

Development of a more biofidelic musculoskeletal model with humeral head translation and glenohumeral ligaments

Computational musculoskeletal modeling is useful for understanding upper extremity biomechanics, especially when in vivo tests are unfeasible. A musculoskeletal model of the upper limb with increased biofidelity was developed by including humeral head translation (HHT) and ligaments. The model was validated and ligament contribution and effect of shoulder (thoracohumeral) elevation on HHT was evaluated. Humerus translated superiorly with increased elevation, with translations closely matching (avg. difference 2.83 mm) previous in vitro studies. HHT and ligament inclusion in the model will improve biomechanical predictions of upper extremity movements and study of conditions, like subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tear, or shoulder instability.

A numerical study of the contact geometry and pressure distribution along the glenoid track

The glenoid track geometry and the contact forces acting on the glenohumeral joint at static positions of 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of abduction with 90° of external rotation were evaluated using a finite element model of the shoulder that, differently from most usual approximations, accounts the humeral head translations and the deformable-to-deformable non-spherical joint contact. The model was based on data acquired from clinical exams of a single subject, including the proximal humerus, scapula, their respective cartilages concerning the glenohumeral joint, and the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. The forces acting on the glenohumeral joint were estimated using a simulation framework consisting of an optimization procedure allied with finite element analysis that seeks the minimum muscle forces that stabilize the joint. The joint reaction force magnitude increases up to 680.25 N at 90° of abduction and decreases at further positions. From 60° onward the articular contact remains at the anterior region of the glenoid cartilage and follows an inferior to superior path at the posterior region of the humeral head cartilage. The maximum contact pressure of 3.104 MPa occurs at 90° abduction. Although translating inferiorly throughout the movement, the projection of the humeral head center at the glenoid plane remains at the central region of the glenoid surface. The model results qualitatively matched the trends observed in the literature and supports the consideration of the translational degrees of freedom to evaluate the joint contact mechanics.

A penalty method for constrained multibody kinematics optimisation using a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

An alternative method for solving constrained multibody kinematics optimisation using a penalty method on constraints and a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is proposed. It is compared to an optimisation resolution with hard kinematic constraints. These methods are applied to two pairs of experiments and models. The penalty method was at least 20 times faster than the optimisation resolution while keeping similar reconstruction errors and constraints violation. The potential of the method is shown to accurately solve the multibody kinematics optimisation problem in a reasonable amount of time. A computational gain lies in implementing this resolution with a compiled and optimised program code.

Mechanical behavior of hybrid glenoid components compared to all-PE components: a finite element analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this finite element study was to compare bone and cement stresses and implant micromotions among all-polyethylene (PE) and hybrid glenoid components. The hypothesis was that, compared to all-PE components, hybrid components yield lower bone and cement stresses with smaller micromotions.

Methods

Implant micromotions and cement and bone stresses were compared among 4 all PE (U-PG, U-KG, A-KG, I-KG) and 2 hybrid (E-hCG, I-hPG) virtually implanted glenoid components. Glenohumeral joint reaction forces were applied at five loading regions (central, anterior, posterior, superior and inferior). Implant failure was assumed if glenoid micromotion exceeded 75 µm or cement stresses exceeded 4 MPa. The critical cement volume (CCV) was based on the percentage of cement volume that exceeded 4 MPa. Results were pooled and summarized in boxplots, and differences evaluated using pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.

Results

Differences in cement stress were found only between the I-hPG hybrid component (2.9 ± 1.0 MPa) and all-PE keeled-components (U-KG: 3.8 ± 0.9 MPa, p = 0.017; A-KG: 3.6 ± 0.5 MPa, p = 0.014; I-KG: 3.6 ± 0.6 MPa, p = 0.040). There were no differences in cortical and trabecular bone stresses among glenoid components. The E-hCG hybrid component exceeded micromotions of 75 µm in 2 patients. There were no differences in %CCV among glenoid components.

Conclusions

Finite element analyses reveal that compared to all-PE glenoid components, hybrid components yield similar average stresses within bone and cement. Finally, risk of fatigue failure of the cement mantle is equal for hybrid and all-PE components, as no difference in %CCV was observed.

Level of evidence

IV, in-silico.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-022-00494-8.

Shoulder Positioning during Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Computational Analysis of Graft Integrity and Shoulder Stability

Simple Summary

In arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) in irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs), a graft is positioned and fixed between the superior rim of the glenoid and the humeral supraspinatus footprint. The fixation of the graft aims to restore the stability and improve the kinematics of the shoulder. The shoulder position during fixation of the graft may be a key factor impacting the outcome of ASCR; however, biomechanical evidence is lacking, as most studies addressing ASCR have been conducted in cadavers. In this study, graft strain and glenohumeral joint reaction force, estimated using a 3-D musculoskeletal model of the upper limb, were used to evaluate graft integrity and shoulder stability, respectively. The results suggest that ASCR significantly improved shoulder stability compared to the preoperative condition; however, the shoulder positions of fixation associated with the greatest improvements were also associated with the highest risk of compromising the integrity of the graft due to high strains. This study provides new and important information regarding the role of shoulder positioning during fixation of the graft.

Abstract

The shoulder position during fixation of the graft may be a key factor impacting the outcome of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) in irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). However, biomechanical evidence regarding this effect is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the shoulder position during fixation of the graft on shoulder stability and graft tear risk in ASCR. A 3-D musculoskeletal model of the upper limb was modified to account for the fixation of the graft in ASCR, assuming a full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon. The concomitant tenotomy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon was also studied. The biomechanical parameters evaluated included the strain of the graft and the glenohumeral joint reaction force (GH JRF), which were used to evaluate graft integrity and shoulder stability, respectively. Fixation of the graft considering abduction angles greater than 15° resulted in a high risk for graft tearing when the arm was adducted to the side of the trunk. For abduction angles below 15°, the mean shoulder stability improved significantly, ranging between 6% and 20% (p < 0.001), compared with that in the preoperative condition. The concomitant tenotomy of the LHB tendon resulted in loss of stability when compared to ASCR with an intact LHB tendon. The position of the shoulder during fixation of the graft has a significant effect on shoulder stability and graft tear risk after ASCR in IRCTs. This study provides new and important information regarding the role of shoulder positioning during fixation of the graft.

Influence of rotator cuff integrity on loading and kinematics before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty has become a very common procedure for shoulder joint replacement, even for scenarios where an anatomical reconstruction would traditionally be used. Our hypothesis is that implanting a reverse prosthesis with a functional rotator cuff may lead to higher joint reaction force (JRF) and have a negative impact on the prosthesis. Available motion capture data during anterior flexion was input to a finite-element musculoskeletal shoulder model, and muscle activations were computed using inverse dynamics. Simulations were carried out for the intact joint as well as for various types of rotator cuff tears: superior (supraspinatus), superior-anterior (supraspinatus and subscapularis), and superior-posterior (supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor). Each rotator cuff tear condition was repeated after shifting the humerus and the glenohumeral joint center of rotation to represent the effect of a reverse prosthesis. Changes in compressive, shear, and total JRF were analyzed. The model compared favorably to in vivo JRF measurements, and existing clinical and biomechanical knowledge. Implanting a reverse prosthesis with a functional rotator cuff or with an isolated supraspinatus tear led to more than 2 times higher compressive JRF than with massive rotator cuff tears (superior-anterior or superior-posterior), while the shear force remained comparable. The total JRF increased more than 1.5 times. While a lower shear to compressive ratio may reduce the risk of glenosphere loosening, higher JRF might increase the risk for other failure modes such as fracture or polyethylene wear of the reverse prosthesis.

Sensitivity of Neuromechanical Predictions to Choice of Glenohumeral Stability Modeling Approach

Most upper-extremity musculoskeletal models represent the glenohumeral joint with an inherently stable ball-and-socket, but the physiological joint requires active muscle coordination for stability. The authors evaluated sensitivity of common predicted outcomes (instability, net glenohumeral reaction force, and rotator cuff activations) to different implementations of active stabilizing mechanisms (constraining net joint reaction direction and incorporating normalized surface electromyography [EMG]). Both EMG and reaction force constraints successfully reduced joint instability. For flexion, incorporating any normalized surface EMG data reduced predicted instability by 54.8%, whereas incorporating any force constraint reduced predicted instability by 43.1%. Other outcomes were sensitive to EMG constraints, but not to force constraints. For flexion, incorporating normalized surface EMG data increased predicted magnitudes of joint reaction force and rotator cuff activations by 28.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Force constraints had no influence on these predicted outcomes for all tasks evaluated. More restrictive EMG constraints also tended to overconstrain the model, making it challenging to accurately track input kinematics. Therefore, force constraints may be a more robust choice when representing stability.