Interfragmentary compression and pull-out properties of 6.5-mm AO cancellous lag screws in a uniform synthetic material during tightening procedures

Interfragmentary compression force and fixation stability of lateral tibial plateau fractures in normal and osteoporotic bones

Lateral platform collapse in fixations of lateral tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) using either double-lag screws fixation (DSF) or locking-plate fixation (LPF) is not rare. This study aimed to explore the effect of enhancing the interfragmentary compression force (IFCF) on fixation stability in lateral TPFs in normal and osteoporotic bones using finite element analysis. Finite element models of DSF in normal bone and LPF in normal and osteoporotic bones were established to simulate the fixations of lateral TPF. After model validation, axial compressive forces of 500, 1000, 1500, and 2500 N to the tibial plateau along with an IFCF of 0, 100, 200, and 300 N were applied. The maximum axial micromotion of the lateral fragment (MAM-LF), maximal translational micromotion of the lateral fragment (MTM-LF), peak von Mises stress (VMS), and peak equivalent elastic strain of the lateral fragment (EES-LF) were evaluated. The MAM-LF showed a decreasing trend as the IFCF increased in all models. For DSF models, the peak VMS of implants increased as the IFCF increased when the axial loads were 500 and 1000 N. The peak EES-LF decreased as the IFCF increased under axial loads of 1000, 1500, and 2500 N. For the normal and osteoporotic LPF models, the peak VMS of the implants decreased as the IFCF increased. Peak EES-LF decreased as IFCF increased. In conclusion, enhancing IFCF was beneficial in improving the fixation stability of lateral TPF. The optimal IFCF for DSF and LPF should be as high as reasonably feasible.

Is initial interfragmentary compression made to last? An ovine bone in vitro study

Interfragmentary compression, a major principle of fracture treatment, is clinically not quantified and might be lost quickly even without functional loads. We designed an experimental study hypothesizing that (1) compression can be controlled using either lag screw or compression plate, and expecting similar initial compression, (2) loss of interfragmentary compression through relaxation within one hour is reduced with neutralization locking plate next to lag screw compared to compression plate. Twelve ovine femora (N=6) and humeri (N=6) were assigned into groups: Group 1 received a 45° oblique osteotomy at mid-diaphysis and was fixated using a 3.5 mm interfragmentary lag screw and locking compression plate (3.5 mm LCP, DePuy Synthes) as neutralization plate. Group 2 received a transverse osteotomy and was fixated with dynamic compression using compression plate (LCP). Interfragmentary pressure and relative bone fragment displacements were recorded over one hour. Median loss of compression over one hour time (relaxation) were 0.52% in Group 1, and 0.17% in Group 2 (p>0.05). Median rotational displacements amounted to 0.46° for Group 1, and 0.31° for Group 2, and axial displacement to a median of -20 μm in Group 1 and 25 μm in Group 2. Ovine bone interfragmentary stress relaxation maintains compression over the first hour for lag screw with neutralization plate for an oblique fracture line or compression plate for a transverse fracture line. Measured compression forces around 100 N could be overcome by physiological tension loading in bending or torsion, necessitating for instance tension band plating, additional lag screws or absolutive stability.

A programmable, fast-fixing, osteo-regenerative, biomechanically robust bone screw

The use of a screw for repairing defected bones is limited by the dilemma between stiffness, bioactivity and internal fixation ability in current products. For polymer bone screw, it is difficult to achieve the bone stiffness and osteo-induction. Polymer composites may enhance bioactivity and mechanical properties but sacrifice the shape memory properties enormously. Herein, we fabricated a programmable bone screw which is composed of shape memory polyurethane, hydroxyapatite and arginylglycylaspartic acid to resolve the above problem. This composite has significantly improved mechanical and shape-memory properties with a modulus of 250 MPa, a shape fixity ratio of ~90% and a shape recovery ratio of ~96%. Moreover, shape fixity and recovery ratios of the produced SMPC screw in the simulative biological condition were respectively ~80% and ~82%. The produced screw could quickly recover to its original shape in vitro within 20 s leading to easy internal fixation. Additionally, the composite could support mesenchymal stem cell survival, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro tests. It also promoted tissue growth and showed beneficial mechanical compatibility after implantation into a rabbit femoral intracondyle for 12 weeks with little inflammation. Such bone screw exhibited a fast-fixing, tightened fitting, enhanced supporting and boosted bioactivity simultaneously in the defective bone, which provides a solution to the long-standing problem for bone repairing. We envision that our composite material will provide valuable insights into the development of a new generation of bone screws with good fixation and osteogenic properties. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The main obstacles to a wider use of a bone screw are unsatisfied stiffness, inflammatory response and screw loosening issues. Herein, we report a programmable screw with mechanically robust, bioactive and fast-fixing performances. The shape memory polymer composite takes advantage of the component in the natural bone and possesses a stable bush-like structure inside through the covalent bonding, and thus achieve significantly improved mechanical and memory properties. Based on its shape memory effect, the produced screw was proved to offer a recovery force to surroundings and promote the bone regeneration effectively. Therefore, the composite realizes our expectations on functions through structure design and paves a practical and effective way for the development of a new generation of bone screws.

Screw insertion torque as parameter to judge the fixation. Assessment of torque and pull-out strength in different bone densities and screw-pitches

BACKGROUND

Pull-out strength is a critical parameter to judge screw fixation in orthopaedic implants. However, the insertion torque is the main feeling in the hand of a surgeon relating to the strength of synthesis. The correlation between pull-out strength and torque is not completely understood. This creates uncertainty about the key-question: Should the torque be considered a valid parameter to judge the quality of fixation?

METHODS

Using the ASTM F543 as reference, three screws differing only in pitch (1.5, 2.1, 2.8 mm pitches) were tested in three foam-block densities (10, 15, and 20 pcf). The correlation was investigated by assessing the role of density and screw geometry.

FINDINGS

Torque was related to pull-out strength in all configurations (R = 0.979, P = 0.000). No difference in pull-out strength was found when screws were tightened to a range of 71.6%, SD = 7.6, of torque to fail (P > 0.05). Torque and pull-out strength were stratified according to density that influenced the two parameters up to 524% (P < 0.000). Pitch determined pull-out strength up to 33% (P < 0.000) while the 2.1 mm screw pitch showed the highest pull-out strength and torque in all configurations.

INTERPRETATION

Insertion torque was demonstrated to be a valid parameter to judge the quality of bone under fixation and therefore, the strength of the synthesis. Surgeons should not tighten the screws to values approaching torque to fail to obtain the highest pull-out strength. Density was the main factor influencing pull-out strength and torque. Pitch is another parameter deciding screw holding capacity.

A comparative study of tapped and untapped pilot holes for bicortical orthopedic screws – 3D finite element analysis with an experimental test

The aim of this study was to compare the screw-to-bone fixation strength of two insertion techniques: self-tapping screw (STS) and non-self-tapping screw (NSTS). Finite element analysis (FEA) was used for the comparison by featuring three tests (insertion, pull-out and shear) in a human tibia bone model. A non-linear material behavior with ductile damage properties was chosen for the modeling. To validate the numerical models, experimental insertion and pull-out tests were carried out using a synthetic bone. The experimental and numerical results of pull-out tests correlated well. Thread forming was successfully simulated during the insertion process of STS and NSTS. It is demonstrated that the STS generates higher insertion torque, induces a higher amount of stress after the insertion process and relatively more strength under the pull-out and shear tests than the NSTS. However, the NSTS induces more stiffness under the two tests (pull-out and shear) and less damage to the screw-bone interface compared to the STS. It is concluded that the use of STS ensures tighter bony contact and enables higher pull-out strength; however, the use of NSTS improves the stiffness of the fixation and induces less damage to the cortical bone-screw fixation and thus minimum risk is obtained in terms of bone necrosis.

Simultaneous Intraoperative Measurement of Cadaver Ankle and Subtalar Joint Compression During Arthrodesis With Intramedullary Nail, Screws, and Tibiotalocalcaneal Plate

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) fusion rates may result from inadequate compression that increases motion and interferes with bony bridging. The aim of this study was to evaluate compressive forces at the ankle and subtalar joints with 3 contemporary TTCA constructs.

METHODS

Thirty fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremity specimens were divided into 3 groups of 10 each: 3 partially threaded cannulated screws, hindfoot nail, and lateral plate. Specimens were mounted to a testing apparatus, and compression was independently measured at the tibiotalar and talocalcaneal interfaces. Statistical analysis included paired Student t tests, analysis of variance, and Tukey post hoc tests.

RESULTS

Mean forces at the ankle joint for the screws, nail, and plate constructs were 331 ± 86, 479 ± 137, and 548 ± 199 N, respectively, with plates providing significantly more compression than screws ( P < .01). Similarly, subtalar compressive forces demonstrated 319 ± 105 N in the screws group, 466 ± 125 N, in the nail group, and 513 ± 181 N in the plate group, with plate compression greater than that achieved with screws ( P < .01). No differences were identified in compression between ankle and subtalar joints within specimens in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral TTCA plates provided increased compressive forces at the ankle and subtalar joint compared with screws-only constructs. Hindfoot nails did not demonstrate significant differences in either of these parameters compared with plates or screws in this study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Hindfoot nail and lateral plate options should be strongly considered when aiming to maximize compression in patients undergoing TTCA.