1
|
Gould SL, Davico G, Liebsch C, Wilke HJ, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Variability of intervertebral joint stiffness between specimens and spine levels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1372088. [PMID: 38486868 PMCID: PMC10937554 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1372088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Musculoskeletal multibody models of the spine can be used to investigate the biomechanical behaviour of the spine. In this context, a correct characterisation of the passive mechanical properties of the intervertebral joint is crucial. The intervertebral joint stiffness, in particular, is typically derived from the literature, and the differences between individuals and spine levels are often disregarded. Methods: This study tested if an optimisation method of personalising the intervertebral joint stiffnesses was able to capture expected stiffness variation between specimens and between spine levels and if the variation between spine levels could be accurately captured using a generic scaling ratio. Multibody models of six T12 to sacrum spine specimens were created from computed tomography data. For each specimen, two models were created: one with uniform stiffnesses across spine levels, and one accounting for level dependency. Three loading conditions were simulated. The initial stiffness values were optimised to minimize the kinematic error. Results: There was a range of optimised stiffnesses across the specimens and the models with level dependent stiffnesses were less accurate than the models without. Using an optimised stiffness substantially reduced prediction errors. Discussion: The optimisation captured the expected variation between specimens, and the prediction errors demonstrated the importance of accounting for level dependency. The inaccuracy of the predicted kinematics for the level-dependent models indicated that a generic scaling ratio is not a suitable method to account for the level dependency. The variation in the optimised stiffnesses for the different loading conditions indicates personalised stiffnesses should also be considered load-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele L. Gould
- Biomechanics Group, Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Davico
- Biomechanics Group, Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Christian Liebsch
- Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research Ulm, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Wilke
- Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research Ulm, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Luca Cristofolini
- Biomechanics Group, Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Viceconti
- Biomechanics Group, Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Z, Zheng Q, Zhang L, Chen R, Li Z, Xu W. Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:97. [PMID: 38279094 PMCID: PMC10821608 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07204-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to investigate the biomechanical differences between different adjunct fixation methods for oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and to further analyze its effect on adjacent segmental degeneration. METHODS We built a single-segment (Si-segment) finite element model (FEM) for L4-5 and a double-segment (Do-segment) FEM for L3-5. Each complete FEM was supplemented and modified, and both developed two surgical models of OLIF with assisted internal fixation. They were OLIF with posterior bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw (TINA system) fixation (OLIF + BPS) and OLIF with lateral plate system (OLIF + LPS). The range of motion (ROM) and displacement of the vertebral body, cage stress, adjacent segment disc stress, and spinal ligament tension were recorded for the four models during flexion/extension, right/left bending, and right/left rotation by applying follower load. RESULTS For the BPS and LPS systems in the six postures of flexion, extension, right/left bending, and right/left rotation, the ROM of L4 in the Si-segment FEM were 0.32°/1.83°, 0.33°/1.34°, 0.23°/0.47°, 0.24°/0.45°, 0.33°/0.79°, and 0.34°/0.62°; the ROM of L4 in the Do-segment FEM were 0.39°/2.00°, 0.37°/1.38°, 0.23°/0.47°, 0.21°/0.44°, 0.33°/0.57°, and 0.31°/0.62°, and the ROM of L3 in the Do-segment FEM were 6.03°/7.31°, 2.52°/3.50°, 4.21°/4.38°, 4.21°/4.42°, 2.09°/2.32°, and 2.07°/2.43°. BPS system had less vertebral displacement, less cage maximum stress, and less spinal ligament tension in Si/Do-segment FEM relative to the LPS system. BPS system had a smaller upper adjacent vertebral ROM, greater intervertebral disc stress in terms of left and right bending as well as left and right rotation compared to the LPS system in the L3-4 of the Do-segment FEM. There was little biomechanical difference between the same fixation system in the Si/Do-segment FEM. CONCLUSIONS Our finite element analysis showed that compared to OLIF + LPS, OLIF + BPS (TINA) is more effective in reducing interbody stress and spinal ligament tension, and it better maintains the stability of the target segment and provides a better fusion environment to resist cage subsidence. However, OLIF + BPS (TINA) may be more likely to cause adjacent segment degeneration than OLIF + LPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengquan Xu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China
| | - Qingcong Zheng
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China
| | - Liqun Zhang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China
| | - Rongsheng Chen
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China
| | - Zhechen Li
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China
| | - Weihong Xu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Remus R, Selkmann S, Lipphaus A, Neumann M, Bender B. Muscle-driven forward dynamic active hybrid model of the lumbosacral spine: combined FEM and multibody simulation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1223007. [PMID: 37829567 PMCID: PMC10565495 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1223007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Most spine models belong to either the musculoskeletal multibody (MB) or finite element (FE) method. Recently, coupling of MB and FE models has increasingly been used to combine advantages of both methods. Active hybrid FE-MB models, still rarely used in spine research, avoid the interface and convergence problems associated with model coupling. They provide the inherent ability to account for the full interplay of passive and active mechanisms for spinal stability. In this paper, we developed and validated a novel muscle-driven forward dynamic active hybrid FE-MB model of the lumbosacral spine (LSS) in ArtiSynth to simultaneously calculate muscle activation patterns, vertebral movements, and internal mechanical loads. The model consisted of the rigid vertebrae L1-S1 interconnected with hyperelastic fiber-reinforced FE intervertebral discs, ligaments, facet joints, and force actuators representing the muscles. Morphological muscle data were implemented via a semi-automated registration procedure. Four auxiliary bodies were utilized to describe non-linear muscle paths by wrapping and attaching the anterior abdominal muscles. This included an abdominal plate whose kinematics was optimized using motion capture data from upper body movements. Intra-abdominal pressure was calculated from the forces of the abdominal muscles compressing the abdominal cavity. For the muscle-driven approach, forward dynamics assisted data tracking was used to predict muscle activation patterns that generate spinal postures and balance the spine without prescribing accurate spinal kinematics. During calibration, the maximum specific muscle tension and spinal rhythms resulting from the model dynamics were evaluated. To validate the model, load cases were simulated from -10° extension to +30° flexion with weights up to 20 kg in both hands. The biomechanical model responses were compared with in vivo literature data of intradiscal pressures, intra-abdominal pressures, and muscle activities. The results demonstrated high agreement with this data and highlight the advantages of active hybrid modeling for the LSS. Overall, this new self-contained tool provides a robust and efficient estimation of LSS biomechanical responses under in vivo similar loads, for example, to improve pain treatment by spinal stabilization therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Remus
- Chair of Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Sascha Selkmann
- Chair of Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Andreas Lipphaus
- Biomechanics Research Group, Chair of Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marc Neumann
- Chair of Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Beate Bender
- Chair of Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knapik GG, Mendel E, Bourekas E, Marras WS. Computational lumbar spine models: A literature review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2022; 100:105816. [PMID: 36435080 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computational spine models of various types have been employed to understand spine function, assess the risk that different activities pose to the spine, and evaluate techniques to prevent injury. The areas in which these models are applied has expanded greatly, potentially beyond the appropriate scope of each, given their capabilities. A comprehensive understanding of the components of these models provides insight into their current capabilities and limitations. METHODS The objective of this review was to provide a critical assessment of the different characteristics of model elements employed across the spectrum of lumbar spine modeling and in newer combined methodologies to help better evaluate existing studies and delineate areas for future research and refinement. FINDINGS A total of 155 studies met selection criteria and were included in this review. Most current studies use either highly detailed Finite Element models or simpler Musculoskeletal models driven with in vivo data. Many models feature significant geometric or loading simplifications that limit their realism and validity. Frequently, studies only create a single model and thus can't account for the impact of subject variability. The lack of model representation for certain subject cohorts leaves significant gaps in spine knowledge. Combining features from both types of modeling could result in more accurate and predictive models. INTERPRETATION Development of integrated models combining elements from different model types in a framework that enables the evaluation of larger populations of subjects could address existing voids and enable more realistic representation of the biomechanics of the lumbar spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory G Knapik
- Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Ehud Mendel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Eric Bourekas
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - William S Marras
- Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tan QC, Huang JF, Bai H, Liu ZX, Huang XY, Zhao X, Yang Z, Du CF, Lei W, Wu ZX. Effects of Revision Rod Position on Spinal Construct Stability in Lumbar Revision Surgery: A Finite Element Study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 9:799727. [PMID: 35071208 PMCID: PMC8766337 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.799727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Revision surgery (RS) is a necessary surgical intervention in clinical practice to treat spinal instrumentation–related symptomatic complications. Three constructs with different configurations have been applied in RS. One distinguishing characteristic of these configurations is that the revision rods connecting previous segments and revision segments are placed alongside, outside, or inside the previous rods at the level of facetectomy. Whether the position of the revision rod could generate mechanical disparities in revision constructs is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of the revision rod position on the construct after RS. A validated spinal finite element (FE) model was developed to simulate RS after previous instrumented fusion using a modified dual-rod construct (DRCm), satellite-rod construct (SRC), and cortical bone trajectory construct (CBTC). Thereafter, maximum von Mises stress (VMS) on the annulus fibrosus and cages and the ligament force of the interspinous ligament, supraspinous ligament, and ligamentum flavum under a pure moment load and a follower load in six directions were applied to assess the influence of the revision rod position on the revision construct. An approximately identical overall reducing tendency of VMS was observed among the three constructs. The changing tendency of the maximum VMS on the cages placed at L4-L5 was nearly equal among the three constructs. However, the changing tendency of the maximum VMS on the cage placed at L2-L3 was notable, especially in the CBTC under right bending and left axial rotation. The overall changing tendency of the ligament force in the DRCm, SRC, and CBTC was also approximately equal, while the ligament force of the CBTC was found to be significantly greater than that of the DRCm and SRC at L1-L2. The results indicated that the stiffness associated with the CBTC might be lower than that associated with the DRCm and SRC in RS. The results of the present study indicated that the DRCm, SRC, and CBTC could provide sufficient stabilization in RS. The CBTC was a less rigid construct. Rather than the revision rod position, the method of constructing spinal instrumentation played a role in influencing the biomechanics of revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan-Chang Tan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.,Department of Orthopaedics, Air Force Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing, China
| | - Jin-Feng Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Hao Bai
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zi-Xuan Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory for Advanced Mechatronic System Design and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Education, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China
| | - Xin-Yi Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiong Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhao Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- Tianjin Key Laboratory for Advanced Mechatronic System Design and Intelligent Control, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Education, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Lei
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zi-Xiang Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Biomechanical effects of lumbar fusion surgery on adjacent segments using musculoskeletal models of the intact, degenerated and fused spine. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17892. [PMID: 34504207 PMCID: PMC8429534 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97288-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjacent segment disorders are prevalent in patients following a spinal fusion surgery. Postoperative alterations in the adjacent segment biomechanics play a role in the etiology of these conditions. While experimental approaches fail to directly quantify spinal loads, previous modeling studies have numerous shortcomings when simulating the complex structures of the spine and the pre/postoperative mechanobiology of the patient. The biomechanical effects of the L4–L5 fusion surgery on muscle forces and adjacent segment kinetics (compression, shear, and moment) were investigated using a validated musculoskeletal model. The model was driven by in vivo kinematics for both preoperative (intact or severely degenerated L4–L5) and postoperative conditions while accounting for muscle atrophies. Results indicated marked changes in the kinetics of adjacent L3–L4 and L5–S1 segments (e.g., by up to 115% and 73% in shear loads and passive moments, respectively) that depended on the preoperative L4–L5 disc condition, postoperative lumbopelvic kinematics and, to a lesser extent, postoperative changes in the L4–L5 segmental lordosis and muscle injuries. Upper adjacent segment was more affected post-fusion than the lower one. While these findings identify risk factors for adjacent segment disorders, they indicate that surgical and postoperative rehabilitation interventions should focus on the preservation/restoration of patient’s normal segmental kinematics.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rajaee MA, Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A. A novel coupled musculoskeletal finite element model of the spine - Critical evaluation of trunk models in some tasks. J Biomech 2021; 119:110331. [PMID: 33631665 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Spine musculoskeletal (MS) models make simplifying assumptions on the intervertebral joint degrees-of-freedom (rotational and/or translational), representation (spherical or beam-like joints), and properties (linear or nonlinear). They also generally neglect the realistic structure of the joints with disc nuclei/annuli, facets, and ligaments. We aim to develop a novel MS model where trunk muscles are incorporated into a detailed finite element (FE) model of the ligamentous T12-S1 spine thus constructing a gold standard coupled MS-FE model. Model predictions are compared under some tasks with those of our earlier spherical joints, beam joints, and hybrid (uncoupled) MS-FE models. The coupled model predicted L4-L5 intradiscal pressures (R2 ≅ 0.97, RMSE ≅ 0.27 MPa) and L1-S1 centers of rotation (CoRs) in agreement to in vivo data. Differences in model predictions grew at larger trunk flexion angles; at the peak (80°) flexion the coupled model predicted, compared to the hybrid model, much smaller global/local muscle forces (~38%), segmental (~44%) and disc (~22%) compression forces but larger segmental (~9%) and disc (~17%) shear loads, ligament forces at the lower lumbar levels (by up to 57%) and facet forces at all levels. The spherical/beam joints models predicted much greater muscle forces and segmental loads under larger flexion angles. Unlike the spherical joints model with fixed CoRs, the beam joints model predicted CoRs closer (RMSE = 2.3 mm in flexion tasks) to those of the coupled model. The coupled model offers a great potential for future studies towards improvement of surgical techniques, management of musculoskeletal injuries and subject-specific simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Rajaee
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - N Arjmand
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
| | - A Shirazi-Adl
- Division of Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu T, El-Rich M. Effects of nucleus pulposus location on spinal loads and joint centers of rotation and reaction during forward flexion: A combined finite element and Musculoskeletal study. J Biomech 2020; 104:109740. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Affolter C, Kedzierska J, Vielma T, Weisse B, Aiyangar A. Estimating lumbar passive stiffness behaviour from subject-specific finite element models and in vivo 6DOF kinematics. J Biomech 2020; 102:109681. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
10
|
Byrne RM, Aiyangar AK, Zhang X. Sensitivity of musculoskeletal model-based lumbar spinal loading estimates to type of kinematic input and passive stiffness properties. J Biomech 2020; 102:109659. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
11
|
Liu T, Khalaf K, Adeeb S, El-Rich M. Numerical Investigation of Intra-abdominal Pressure Effects on Spinal Loads and Load-Sharing in Forward Flexion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7:428. [PMID: 31921829 PMCID: PMC6928040 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), which generates extensor torque and unloads the spine, is often neglected in most of the numerical studies that use musculoskeletal (MSK) or finite element (FE) spine models. Hence, the spinal loads predicted by these models may not be realistic. In this work, we quantified the effects of IAP variation in forward flexion on spinal loads and load-sharing using a novel computational tool that combines a MSK model of the trunk with a FE model of the ligamentous lumbosacral spine. The MSK model predicted the trunk muscle and reaction forces at the T12-L1 junction, with or without the IAP, which served as input in the FE model to investigate the effects of IAP on spinal loads and load-sharing. The findings confirm the unloading role of the IAP, especially at large flexion angles. Inclusion of the IAP reduced global muscle forces and disc loads, as well as the intradiscal pressure (IDP). The reduction in disc loads was compensated for by an increase in ligament forces. The IDP, as well as the strain of the annular fibers were more sensitive to the IAP at the upper levels of the spine. Including the IAP also increased the ligaments' load-sharing which reduced the role of the disc in resisting internal forces. These results are valuable for more accurate spinal computational studies, particularly toward clinical applications as well as the design of disc implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kinda Khalaf
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Samer Adeeb
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Marwan El-Rich
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang C, Mannen EM, Sis HL, Cadel ES, Wong BM, Wang W, Cheng B, Friis EA, Anderson DE. Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis. J Biomech 2019; 100:109579. [PMID: 31911050 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Spinal intervertebral joints are complex structures allowing motion in multiple directions, and many experimental studies have reported moment-rotation response. However, experimental methods, reporting of results, and levels of the spine tested vary widely, and a comprehensive assessment of moment-rotation response across all levels of the spine is lacking. This review aims to characterize moment-rotation response in a consistent manner for all levels of the human spine. A literature search was conducted in PubMed for moment versus rotation data from mechanical testing of intact human cadaveric intervertebral joint specimens in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. A total of 45 studies were included, providing data from testing of an estimated 1,648 intervertebral joints from 518 human cadavers. We used mixed-effects regression analysis to create 75 regression models of moment-rotation response (25 intervertebral joints × 3 directions). We found that a cubic polynomial model provides a good representation of the moment-rotation behavior of most intervertebral joints, and that compressive loading increases rotational stiffness throughout the spine in all directions. The results allow for the direct evaluation of intervertebral ranges of motion across the whole of the spine for given loading conditions. The random-effects outcomes, representing standard deviations of the model coefficients across the dataset, can aid understanding of normal variations in moment-rotation responses. Overall these results fill a large gap, providing the first realistic and comprehensive representations of moment-rotation behavior at all levels of the spine, with broad implications for surgical planning, medical device design, computational modeling, and understanding of spine biomechanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaofei Zhang
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Erin M Mannen
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bo Cheng
- Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Dennis E Anderson
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baldoni M, Gu W. Effect of fixed charge density on water content of IVD during bed rest: A numerical analysis. Med Eng Phys 2019; 70:72-77. [PMID: 31248789 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The fixed charge density (FCD) in the intervertebral disc (IVD) matrix is essential for its capacity of absorbing water, particularly during overnight bed rest. However, the FCD decreases with IVD degeneration, reducing the disc propensity to swell and the related convective transport of molecules across the IVDs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the FCD on water intake in the IVD during bed rest. A multibody musculoskeletal model was extended to include the osmotic properties of the IVDs, and used for the analysis of IVD swelling and its water content in a human subject during bed rest. The simulations were conducted with both healthy lumbar IVDs and lumbar IVDs with a reduced FCD. It was predicted that a decrease in the FCD had a considerable impact on the IVDs swelling during bed rest. A 20% and a 45% reduction in the FCD resulted respectively in an average 25% and 55% reduction of disc water intake overnight. This study provided an additional, quantitative information on IVD swelling in human subjects during bed rest. The computational model presented in this paper may be a useful tool for estimating disc hydration at different loading and pathological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Baldoni
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States.
| | - Weiyong Gu
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Senteler M, Aiyangar A, Weisse B, Farshad M, Snedeker JG. Sensitivity of intervertebral joint forces to center of rotation location and trends along its migration path. J Biomech 2018; 70:140-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|