Automated functional electrical stimulation training system for upper-limb function recovery in poststroke patients

A systematic review on functional electrical stimulation based rehabilitation systems for upper limb post-stroke recovery

Background

Stroke is one of the most common neurological conditions that often leads to upper limb motor impairments, significantly affecting individuals' quality of life. Rehabilitation strategies are crucial in facilitating post-stroke recovery and improving functional independence. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) systems have emerged as promising upper limb rehabilitation tools, offering innovative neuromuscular reeducation approaches.

Objective

The main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the start-of-the-art functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems for upper limb neurorehabilitation in post-stroke therapy. More specifically, this paper aims to review different types of FES systems, their feasibility testing, or randomized control trials (RCT) studies.

Methods

The FES systems classification is based on the involvement of patient feedback within the FES control, which mainly includes "Open-Loop FES Systems" (manually controlled) and "Closed-Loop FES Systems" (brain-computer interface-BCI and electromyography-EMG controlled). Thus, valuable insights are presented into the technological advantages and effectiveness of Manual FES, EEG-FES, and EMG-FES systems.

Results and discussion

The review analyzed 25 studies and found that the use of FES-based rehabilitation systems resulted in favorable outcomes for the stroke recovery of upper limb functional movements, as measured by the FMA (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) (Manually controlled FES: mean difference = 5.6, 95% CI (3.77, 7.5), P < 0.001; BCI-controlled FES: mean difference = 5.37, 95% CI (4.2, 6.6), P < 0.001; EMG-controlled FES: mean difference = 14.14, 95% CI (11.72, 16.6), P < 0.001) and ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) (EMG-controlled FES: mean difference = 11.9, 95% CI (8.8, 14.9), P < 0.001) scores. Furthermore, the shortcomings, clinical considerations, comparison to non-FES systems, design improvements, and possible future implications are also discussed for improving stroke rehabilitation systems and advancing post-stroke recovery. Thus, summarizing the existing literature, this review paper can help researchers identify areas for further investigation. This can lead to formulating research questions and developing new studies aimed at improving FES systems and their outcomes in upper limb rehabilitation.

Multi-Channel FES Gait Rehabilitation Assistance System Based on Adaptive sEMG Modulation

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can be used to stimulate the lower-limb muscles to provide walking assistance to stroke patients. However, the existing surface electromyography (sEMG)-based FES control methods mostly only consider a single muscle with a fixed stimulation intensity and frequency. This study proposes a multi-channel FES gait rehabilitation assistance system based on adaptive myoelectric modulation. The proposed system collects sEMG of the vastus lateralis muscle on the non-affected side to predict the sEMG values of four targeted lower-limb muscles on the affected side using a bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM) model. Next, the proposed system modulates the real-time FES output frequency for four targeted muscles based on the predicted sEMG values to provide muscle force compensation. Fifteen healthy subjects were recruited to participate in an offline model-building experiment conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed BILSTM model in predicting the sEMG values. The experimental results showed that the [Formula: see text] value of the best-obtained prediction result reached 0.85 using the BILSTM model, which was significantly higher than that using traditional prediction methods. Moreover, two patients after stroke were recruited in the online assisted-walking experiment to verify the effectiveness of the proposed walking-assistance system. The experimental results showed that the activation of the target muscles of the patients was higher after FES, and the gait movement data were significantly different before and after FES. The proposed system can be effectively applied to walking assistance for stroke patients, and the experimental results can provide new ideas and methods for sEMG-controlled FES rehabilitation applications.

Contralaterally EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation during serious gaming for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study

Introduction

Virtual Reality/serious games (SG) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapies are used in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. A combination of both approaches seems to be beneficial for therapy success. The feasibility of a combination of SG and contralaterally EMG-triggered FES (SG+FES) was investigated as well as the characteristics of responders to such a therapy.

Materials and methods

In a randomized crossover trial, patients performed two gaming conditions: SG alone and SG+FES. Feasibility of the therapy system was assessed using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), the Nasa Task Load Index, and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Gaming parameters, fatigue level and a technical documentation was implemented for further information.

Results

In total, 18 patients after stroke (62.1 ± 14.1 years) with a unilateral paresis of the upper limb (MRC ≤4) were analyzed in this study. Both conditions were perceived as feasible. Comparing the IMI scores between conditions, perceived competence was significantly increased (z = -2.88, p = 0.004) and pressure/tension during training (z = -2.13, p = 0.034) was decreased during SG+FES. Furthermore, the task load was rated significantly lower for the SG+FES condition (z = -3.14, p = 0.002), especially the physical demand (z = -3.08, p = 0.002), while the performance was rated better (z = -2.59, p = 0.010). Responses to the SUS and the perceived level of fatigue did not differ between conditions (SUS: z = -0.79, p = 0.431; fatigue: z = 1.57, p = 0.115). For patients with mild to moderate impairments (MRC 3-4) the combined therapy provided no or little gaming benefit. The additional use of contralaterally controlled FES (ccFES), however, enabled severely impaired patients (MRC 0-1) to play the SG.

Discussion

The combination of SG with ccFES is feasible and well-accepted among patients after stroke. It seems that the additional use of ccFES may be more beneficial for severely impaired patients as it enables the execution of the serious game. These findings provide valuable implications for the development of rehabilitation systems by combining different therapeutic interventions to increase patients' benefit and proposes system modifications for home use.

Clinical trial registration

https://drks.de/search/en, DRKS00025761.

Muscle synergies for evaluating upper limb in clinical applications: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Muscle synergies have been proposed as a strategy employed by the central nervous system to control movements. Muscle synergy analysis is a well-established framework to examine the pathophysiological basis of neurological diseases and has been applied for analysis and assessment in clinical applications in the last decades, even if it has not yet been widely used in clinical diagnosis, rehabilitative treatment and interventions. Even if inconsistencies in the outputs among studies and lack of a normative pipeline including signal processing and synergy analysis limit the progress, common findings and results are identifiable as a basis for future research. Therefore, a literature review that summarizes methods and main findings of previous works on upper limb muscle synergies in clinical environment is needed to i) summarize the main findings so far, ii) highlight the barriers limiting their use in clinical applications, and iii) suggest future research directions needed for facilitating translation of experimental research to clinical scenarios.

METHODS

Articles in which muscle synergies were used to analyze and assess upper limb function in neurological impairments were reviewed. The literature research was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Experimental protocols (e.g., the aim of the study, number and type of participants, number and type of muscles, and tasks), methods (e.g., muscle synergy models and synergy extraction methods, signal processing methods), and the main findings of eligible studies were reported and discussed.

RESULTS

383 articles were screened and 51 were selected, which involved a total of 13 diseases and 748 patients and 1155 participants. Each study investigated on average 15 ± 10 patients. Four to forty-one muscles were included in the muscle synergy analysis. Point-to-point reaching was the most used task. The preprocessing of EMG signals and algorithms for synergy extraction varied among studies, and non-negative matrix factorization was the most used method. Five EMG normalization methods and five methods for identifying the optimal number of synergies were used in the selected papers. Most of the studies report that analyses on synergy number, structure, and activations provide novel insights on the physiopathology of motor control that cannot be gained with standard clinical assessments, and suggest that muscle synergies may be useful to personalize therapies and to develop new therapeutic strategies. However, in the selected studies synergies were used only for assessment; different testing procedures were used and, in general, study-specific modifications of muscle synergies were observed; single session or longitudinal studies mainly aimed at assessing stroke (71% of the studies), even though other pathologies were also investigated. Synergy modifications were either study-specific or were not observed, with few analyses available for temporal coefficients. Thus, several barriers prevent wider adoption of muscle synergy analysis including a lack of standardized experimental protocols, signal processing procedures, and synergy extraction methods. A compromise in the design of the studies must be found to combine the systematicity of motor control studies and the feasibility of clinical studies. There are however several potential developments that might promote the use of muscle synergy analysis in clinical practice, including refined assessments based on synergistic approaches not allowed by other methods and the availability of novel models. Finally, neural substrates of muscle synergies are discussed, and possible future research directions are proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides new perspectives about the challenges and open issues that need to be addressed in future work to achieve a better understanding of motor impairments and rehabilitative therapy using muscle synergies. These include the application of the methods on wider scales, standardization of procedures, inclusion of synergies in the clinical decisional process, assessment of temporal coefficients and temporal-based models, extensive work on the algorithms and understanding of the physio-pathological mechanisms of pathology, as well as the application and adaptation of synergy-based approaches to various rehabilitative scenarios for increasing the available evidence.

Gait regulation of hindlimb based on central pattern generator in rats with a spinal cord injury

A spinal stimulator that can regulate hindlimb movements using monopolar stimulation has not been developed yet. Nevertheless, in a previous study, we found a specific central pattern generator site on the right side of the rat spinal cord. By stimulating these sites with certain pulse signals, the alternating movement of the hindlimb can be obtained using fewer electrodes. Therefore, in this research, considering the specific central pattern generator site as the target, functional electrical stimulation was performed on rats with spinal cord injury using monopolar stimulation. Angle sensors were used to track and capture the knee joint angle data of the right hindlimb; thus, the mapping relationship between the voltage amplitude and the knee angle parameters was established. Based on this relationship, the rats’ hindlimb were controlled. Compared with the traditional spinal stimulator, the proposed approach increases the gait feedback, requires fewer electrodes, and simplifies the timing of stimulation. The rats with spinal cord injury were subjected to stimulation training for half an hour every day for 28 consecutive days. The Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan score showed that 76% of the health level could be achieved on the 28th day. Finally, somatosensory evoked potential analysis showed that the measurement results were close to the standard value on the 28th day. This study lays a foundation for future rehabilitation research on the hindlimb.

Whole-Body Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation Kinesitherapy Can Promote the Restoring of Physiological Muscle Synergies for Neurological Patients

Background: Neurological diseases and traumas are major factors that may reduce motor functionality. Functional electrical stimulation is a technique that helps regain motor function, assisting patients in daily life activities and in rehabilitation practices. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a treatment based on whole-body Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation Kinesitherapy (AFESK™) with the use of muscle synergies, a well-established method for evaluation of motor coordination. The evaluation is performed on retrospectively gathered data of neurological patients executing whole-body movements before and after AFESK-based treatments. Methods: Twenty-four chronic neurologic patients and 9 healthy subjects were recruited in this study. The patient group was further subdivided in 3 subgroups: hemiplegic, tetraplegic and paraplegic. All patients underwent two acquisition sessions: before treatment and after a FES based rehabilitation treatment at the VIKTOR Physio Lab. Patients followed whole-body exercise protocols tailored to their needs. The control group of healthy subjects performed all movements in a single session and provided reference data for evaluating patients’ performance. sEMG was recorded on relevant muscles and muscle synergies were extracted for each patient’s EMG data and then compared to the ones extracted from the healthy volunteers. To evaluate the effect of the treatment, the motricity index was measured and patients’ extracted synergies were compared to the control group before and after treatment. Results: After the treatment, patients’ motricity index increased for many of the screened body segments. Muscle synergies were more similar to those of healthy people. Globally, the normalized synergy similarity in respect to the control group was 0.50 before the treatment and 0.60 after (p < 0.001), with improvements for each subgroup of patients. Conclusions: AFESK treatment induced favorable changes in muscle activation patterns in chronic neurologic patients, partially restoring muscular patterns similar to healthy people. The evaluation of the synergic relationships of muscle activity when performing test exercises allows to assess the results of rehabilitation measures in patients with impaired locomotor functions.

Intra-Subject and Inter-Subject Movement Variability Quantified with Muscle Synergies in Upper-Limb Reaching Movements

Quantifying movement variability is a crucial aspect for clinical and laboratory investigations in several contexts. However, very few studies have assessed, in detail, the intra-subject variability across movements and the inter-subject variability. Muscle synergies are a valuable method that can be used to assess such variability. In this study, we assess, in detail, intra-subject and inter-subject variability in a scenario based on a comprehensive dataset, including multiple repetitions of multi-directional reaching movements. The results show that muscle synergies are a valuable tool for quantifying variability at the muscle level and reveal that intra-subject variability is lower than inter-subject variability in synergy modules and related temporal coefficients, and both intra-subject and inter-subject similarity are higher than random synergy matching, confirming shared underlying control structures. The study deepens the available knowledge on muscle synergy-based motor function assessment and rehabilitation applications, discussing their applicability to real scenarios.