1
|
Astaraki M, Häger W, Lazzeroni M, Toma-Dasu I. Radiomics and deep learning models for glioblastoma treatment outcome prediction based on tumor invasion modeling. Phys Med 2025; 129:104881. [PMID: 39724784 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigate the feasibility of using a biophysically guided approach for delineating the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) by evaluating its impact on the treatment outcomes, specifically Overall Survival (OS) time. METHODS An established reaction-diffusion model was employed to simulate the spatiotemporal evolution of cancerous regions in T1-MRI images of GBM patients. The effects of the parameters of this model on the simulated tumor borders were quantified and the optimal values were used to estimate the distribution of infiltrative cells (CTVmodel). Radiomics and deep learning models were examined to predict the OS time by analyzing the GTV, clinical CTV, and CTVmodel. RESULTS The study involves 126 subjects for model development and 62 independent subjects for testing. Evaluation of the proposed approach demonstrates comparable predictive power for OS time that is achieved with the clinically defined CTV. Specifically, for the binary survival prediction, short vs. long time, the proposed CTVmodelresulted in improvements of prognostic power, in terms of AUROC, both for the validation (0.77 from 0.75) and the testing (0.73 from 0.71) set. Quantitative comparisons for three-class prediction and survival regression models exhibited a similar trend of comparable performance. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the potential of biophysical modeling for estimating and incorporating the spread of infiltrating cells into CTV delineation. Further clinical investigations are required to validate the clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Astaraki
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Wille Häger
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marta Lazzeroni
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang RZ, Ezhov I, Balcerak M, Zhu A, Wiestler B, Menze B, Lowengrub JS. Personalized predictions of Glioblastoma infiltration: Mathematical models, Physics-Informed Neural Networks and multimodal scans. Med Image Anal 2024; 101:103423. [PMID: 39700844 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
Predicting the infiltration of Glioblastoma (GBM) from medical MRI scans is crucial for understanding tumor growth dynamics and designing personalized radiotherapy treatment plans. Mathematical models of GBM growth can complement the data in the prediction of spatial distributions of tumor cells. However, this requires estimating patient-specific parameters of the model from clinical data, which is a challenging inverse problem due to limited temporal data and the limited time between imaging and diagnosis. This work proposes a method that uses Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to estimate patient-specific parameters of a reaction-diffusion partial differential equation (PDE) model of GBM growth from a single 3D structural MRI snapshot. PINNs embed both the data and the PDE into a loss function, thus integrating theory and data. Key innovations include the identification and estimation of characteristic non-dimensional parameters, a pre-training step that utilizes the non-dimensional parameters and a fine-tuning step to determine the patient specific parameters. Additionally, the diffuse-domain method is employed to handle the complex brain geometry within the PINN framework. The method is validated on both synthetic and patient datasets, showing promise for personalized GBM treatment through parametric inference within clinically relevant timeframes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Zirui Zhang
- Department of Mathematics, University of California Irvine, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John S Lowengrub
- Department of Mathematics, University of California Irvine, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tian S, Liu Y, Mao X, Xu X, He S, Jia L, Zhang W, Peng P, Wang J. A multicenter study on deep learning for glioblastoma auto-segmentation with prior knowledge in multimodal imaging. Cancer Sci 2024; 115:3415-3425. [PMID: 39119927 PMCID: PMC11447882 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
A precise radiotherapy plan is crucial to ensure accurate segmentation of glioblastomas (GBMs) for radiation therapy. However, the traditional manual segmentation process is labor-intensive and heavily reliant on the experience of radiation oncologists. In this retrospective study, a novel auto-segmentation method is proposed to address these problems. To assess the method's applicability across diverse scenarios, we conducted its development and evaluation using a cohort of 148 eligible patients drawn from four multicenter datasets and retrospective data collection including noncontrast CT, multisequence MRI scans, and corresponding medical records. All patients were diagnosed with histologically confirmed high-grade glioma (HGG). A deep learning-based method (PKMI-Net) for automatically segmenting gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volumes (CTV1 and CTV2) of GBMs was proposed by leveraging prior knowledge from multimodal imaging. The proposed PKMI-Net demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting, respectively, GTV, CTV1, and CTV2 in an 11-patient test set, achieving Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.94, 0.95, and 0.92; 95% Hausdorff distances (HD95) of 2.07, 1.18, and 3.95 mm; average surface distances (ASD) of 0.69, 0.39, and 1.17 mm; and relative volume differences (RVD) of 5.50%, 9.68%, and 3.97%. Moreover, the vast majority of GTV, CTV1, and CTV2 produced by PKMI-Net are clinically acceptable and require no revision for clinical practice. In our multicenter evaluation, the PKMI-Net exhibited consistent and robust generalizability across the various datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in automatically segmenting GBMs. The proposed method using prior knowledge in multimodal imaging can improve the contouring accuracy of GBMs, which holds the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of GBMs' radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suqing Tian
- Department of Radiation OncologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Yinglong Liu
- United Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical EquipmentShenzhenChina
| | - Xinhui Mao
- Radiotherapy CenterPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous RegionUrumqiChina
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical UniversityTai'anChina
| | - Shumeng He
- Intelligent Radiation Treatment LaboratoryUnited Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent ImagingBeijingChina
| | - Lecheng Jia
- United Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical EquipmentShenzhenChina
| | - Wei Zhang
- Radiotherapy Business UnitShanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Peng Peng
- United Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical EquipmentShenzhenChina
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Erdur AC, Rusche D, Scholz D, Kiechle J, Fischer S, Llorián-Salvador Ó, Buchner JA, Nguyen MQ, Etzel L, Weidner J, Metz MC, Wiestler B, Schnabel J, Rueckert D, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Deep learning for autosegmentation for radiotherapy treatment planning: State-of-the-art and novel perspectives. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02262-2. [PMID: 39105745 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has gained importance, with many tools already entering our daily lives. The medical field of radiation oncology is also subject to this development, with AI entering all steps of the patient journey. In this review article, we summarize contemporary AI techniques and explore the clinical applications of AI-based automated segmentation models in radiotherapy planning, focusing on delineation of organs at risk (OARs), the gross tumor volume (GTV), and the clinical target volume (CTV). Emphasizing the need for precise and individualized plans, we review various commercial and freeware segmentation tools and also state-of-the-art approaches. Through our own findings and based on the literature, we demonstrate improved efficiency and consistency as well as time savings in different clinical scenarios. Despite challenges in clinical implementation such as domain shifts, the potential benefits for personalized treatment planning are substantial. The integration of mathematical tumor growth models and AI-based tumor detection further enhances the possibilities for refining target volumes. As advancements continue, the prospect of one-stop-shop segmentation and radiotherapy planning represents an exciting frontier in radiotherapy, potentially enabling fast treatment with enhanced precision and individualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayhan Can Erdur
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
| | - Daniel Rusche
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Daniel Scholz
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Johannes Kiechle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Konrad Zuse School of Excellence in Reliable AI (relAI), Technical University of Munich, Walther-von-Dyck-Straße 10, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Stefan Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Óscar Llorián-Salvador
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 3, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU), Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Josef A Buchner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Mai Q Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Lucas Etzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Jonas Weidner
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Marie-Christin Metz
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Julia Schnabel
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Konrad Zuse School of Excellence in Reliable AI (relAI), Technical University of Munich, Walther-von-Dyck-Straße 10, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Bavaria, Germany
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Strand, WC2R 2LS, London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, SW7 2BX, London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Metzcar J, Jutzeler CR, Macklin P, Köhn-Luque A, Brüningk SC. A review of mechanistic learning in mathematical oncology. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1363144. [PMID: 38533513 PMCID: PMC10963621 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Mechanistic learning refers to the synergistic combination of mechanistic mathematical modeling and data-driven machine or deep learning. This emerging field finds increasing applications in (mathematical) oncology. This review aims to capture the current state of the field and provides a perspective on how mechanistic learning may progress in the oncology domain. We highlight the synergistic potential of mechanistic learning and point out similarities and differences between purely data-driven and mechanistic approaches concerning model complexity, data requirements, outputs generated, and interpretability of the algorithms and their results. Four categories of mechanistic learning (sequential, parallel, extrinsic, intrinsic) of mechanistic learning are presented with specific examples. We discuss a range of techniques including physics-informed neural networks, surrogate model learning, and digital twins. Example applications address complex problems predominantly from the domain of oncology research such as longitudinal tumor response predictions or time-to-event modeling. As the field of mechanistic learning advances, we aim for this review and proposed categorization framework to foster additional collaboration between the data- and knowledge-driven modeling fields. Further collaboration will help address difficult issues in oncology such as limited data availability, requirements of model transparency, and complex input data which are embraced in a mechanistic learning framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Metzcar
- Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, IN, United States
- Informatics, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Catherine R. Jutzeler
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul Macklin
- Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Alvaro Köhn-Luque
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sarah C. Brüningk
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Metz MC, Ezhov I, Peeken JC, Buchner JA, Lipkova J, Kofler F, Waldmannstetter D, Delbridge C, Diehl C, Bernhardt D, Schmidt-Graf F, Gempt J, Combs SE, Zimmer C, Menze B, Wiestler B. Toward image-based personalization of glioblastoma therapy: A clinical and biological validation study of a novel, deep learning-driven tumor growth model. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdad171. [PMID: 38435962 PMCID: PMC10907005 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The diffuse growth pattern of glioblastoma is one of the main challenges for accurate treatment. Computational tumor growth modeling has emerged as a promising tool to guide personalized therapy. Here, we performed clinical and biological validation of a novel growth model, aiming to close the gap between the experimental state and clinical implementation. Methods One hundred and twenty-four patients from The Cancer Genome Archive (TCGA) and 397 patients from the UCSF Glioma Dataset were assessed for significant correlations between clinical data, genetic pathway activation maps (generated with PARADIGM; TCGA only), and infiltration (Dw) as well as proliferation (ρ) parameters stemming from a Fisher-Kolmogorov growth model. To further evaluate clinical potential, we performed the same growth modeling on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging data from 30 patients of our institution and compared model-derived tumor volume and recurrence coverage with standard radiotherapy plans. Results The parameter ratio Dw/ρ (P < .05 in TCGA) as well as the simulated tumor volume (P < .05 in TCGA/UCSF) were significantly inversely correlated with overall survival. Interestingly, we found a significant correlation between 11 proliferation pathways and the estimated proliferation parameter. Depending on the cutoff value for tumor cell density, we observed a significant improvement in recurrence coverage without significantly increased radiation volume utilizing model-derived target volumes instead of standard radiation plans. Conclusions Identifying a significant correlation between computed growth parameters and clinical and biological data, we highlight the potential of tumor growth modeling for individualized therapy of glioblastoma. This might improve the accuracy of radiation planning in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Christin Metz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ivan Ezhov
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM—Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Josef A Buchner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jana Lipkova
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM—Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Claire Delbridge
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wagner A, Schlicke P, Fritz M, Kuttler C, Oden JT, Schumann C, Wohlmuth B. A phase-field model for non-small cell lung cancer under the effects of immunotherapy. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2023; 20:18670-18694. [PMID: 38052574 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Formulating mathematical models that estimate tumor growth under therapy is vital for improving patient-specific treatment plans. In this context, we present our recent work on simulating non-small-scale cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a simple, deterministic setting for two different patients receiving an immunotherapeutic treatment. At its core, our model consists of a Cahn-Hilliard-based phase-field model describing the evolution of proliferative and necrotic tumor cells. These are coupled to a simplified nutrient model that drives the growth of the proliferative cells and their decay into necrotic cells. The applied immunotherapy decreases the proliferative cell concentration. Here, we model the immunotherapeutic agent concentration in the entire lung over time by an ordinary differential equation (ODE). Finally, reaction terms provide a coupling between all these equations. By assuming spherical, symmetric tumor growth and constant nutrient inflow, we simplify this full 3D cancer simulation model to a reduced 1D model. We can then resort to patient data gathered from computed tomography (CT) scans over several years to calibrate our model. Our model covers the case in which the immunotherapy is successful and limits the tumor size, as well as the case predicting a sudden relapse, leading to exponential tumor growth. Finally, we move from the reduced model back to the full 3D cancer simulation in the lung tissue. Thereby, we demonstrate the predictive benefits that a more detailed patient-specific simulation including spatial information as a possible generalization within our framework could yield in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Wagner
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Pirmin Schlicke
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Marvin Fritz
- Computational Methods for PDEs, Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
| | - Christina Kuttler
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - J Tinsley Oden
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Christian Schumann
- Clinic of Pneumology, Thoracic Oncology, Sleep and Respiratory Critical Care, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Barbara Wohlmuth
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou T, Noeuveglise A, Modzelewski R, Ghazouani F, Thureau S, Fontanilles M, Ruan S. Prediction of brain tumor recurrence location based on multi-modal fusion and nonlinear correlation learning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2023; 106:102218. [PMID: 36947921 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Brain tumor is one of the leading causes of cancer death. The high-grade brain tumors are easier to recurrent even after standard treatment. Therefore, developing a method to predict brain tumor recurrence location plays an important role in the treatment planning and it can potentially prolong patient's survival time. There is still little work to deal with this issue. In this paper, we present a deep learning-based brain tumor recurrence location prediction network. Since the dataset is usually small, we propose to use transfer learning to improve the prediction. We first train a multi-modal brain tumor segmentation network on the public dataset BraTS 2021. Then, the pre-trained encoder is transferred to our private dataset for extracting the rich semantic features. Following that, a multi-scale multi-channel feature fusion model and a nonlinear correlation learning module are developed to learn the effective features. The correlation between multi-channel features is modeled by a nonlinear equation. To measure the similarity between the distributions of original features of one modality and the estimated correlated features of another modality, we propose to use Kullback-Leibler divergence. Based on this divergence, a correlation loss function is designed to maximize the similarity between the two feature distributions. Finally, two decoders are constructed to jointly segment the present brain tumor and predict its future tumor recurrence location. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that can segment the present tumor and at the same time predict future tumor recurrence location, making the treatment planning more efficient and precise. The experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed method to predict the brain tumor recurrence location from the limited dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongxue Zhou
- School of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | | | - Romain Modzelewski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, 76038, France
| | - Fethi Ghazouani
- Université de Rouen Normandie, LITIS - QuantIF, Rouen 76183, France
| | - Sébastien Thureau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, 76038, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, 76038, France
| | - Su Ruan
- Université de Rouen Normandie, LITIS - QuantIF, Rouen 76183, France.
| |
Collapse
|