First resuscitation of critical burn patients: progresses and problems

The Pre-Hospital Initial Fluid Therapy Estimate in Early Nasty Burns (PHIFTEEN B, 15-B) Guideline applied to a retrospective cohort of Intensive Care Unit patients with major burns

BACKGROUND

Appropriate fluid administration in severe burns is a cornerstone of early burns management. The American Burns Association's (ABA) recommendation is to administer 2 mL-4 mL × burnt Body Surface Area (BSA) × weight in the first 24 h with half administered in the first eight hours. Unfortunately, the calculations involved are complex and clinicians do not estimate the BSA or weight well, which can lead to errors in the amount of fluid administered. To simplify cognitive load to calculate the fluid resuscitation of early burns, the investigators derived the PHIFTEEN B (15-B) guideline. The 15-B guideline estimates the initial hourly fluid for adults ≥ 50 kg to be: 15 mL × BSA (to the nearest 10%) AIMS: To model and determine the accuracy of the 15-B calculated based on the characteristics of a retrospective cohort of patients admitted with ≥ 20% BSA to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

METHODS

The 15-B formula was retrospectively calculated on the prehospital BSA estimate on patients admitted to the RBWH ICU. In addition, the 15-B guideline was modelled against a variety of weights and BSAs. The fluid volume was deemed to be clinically significant if it was greater than 250 mL/h outside the ABA's recommendations.

RESULTS

The ICU cohort consisted of 107 patients (63.2% male, median age 37 years), with a median ICU estimated BSA of 40% and a median ICU weight estimation of 80 kg. In 43.9% of the cohort, the magnitude of the proportional difference between prehospital and ICU BSA estimate was greater than 25%. The 15-B formula accurately estimated the hourly fluid for all BSA (20%-100%) and weight combinations (50 kg-140 kg) in a BSA- weight matrix. When prehospital BSA estimate was utilized, 15-B guideline accurately estimated the fluid to be given within clinically significant limits for 97.2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The 15-B formula is a simple, easy to calculate guideline which approximates the early fluid estimates in severely burned patients despite inaccuracy in prehospital BSA estimates.

Is the Parkland formula still the best method for determining the fluid resuscitation volume in adults for the first 24 hours after injury? - A retrospective analysis of burn patients in Germany

BACKGROUND

R Rapid fluid resuscitation is a crucial therapy during the treatment of patients with extensive burns. In 1968, the Parkland Formula was introduced for the calculation of the estimated volume of the resuscitation fluid. Since then, different methods for the calculation of fluid resuscitation volume have been developed. We aimed to evaluate if the Parkland formula is still the most effective method for fluid resuscitation volume calculation in burn patients.

METHODS

In the period between January 2015 and January 2019, data from 569 patients over 16 years old with burns of more than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) and at least 15% TBSA full thickness burns were entered in the German burn registry. The patients were divided into 5 groups (0, +1, -1, +2, -2) according to the volume of the resuscitation fluid they received. Group 0 patients received the amount of fluid calculated according to the Parkland formula (n = 83). The 4 other groups received reduced (-1, -2) or increased (+1, +2) fluid volumes in comparison to the value obtained by the Parkland formula.

RESULTS

Patients in Group 0 presented a significantly lower mortality in the first week (4.5%) compared to groups -2 (16.7%) and group +2 (19.5%) (p = 0.021). Furthermore, the mean number of operations in group +2 (5.81) was higher than in group -2 (3.81). Surviving patients from group +2 presented a longer hospital stay (68.1 days) compared to the other groups. Additionally, the logistic regression analysis showed a higher survival of patients in groups -2 and -1 (regression coefficients -0.11 and -0.086; Odds Ratio 0.896 and 0.918; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0,411-1.951 and 0.42-2.004).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, register based analysis a restrictive fluid regime was associated with a higher survival compared to the liberal Parkland guided fluid regime.

Changes in total body surface area and the distribution of skin surfaces in relation to body mass index

BACKGROUND

A correct estimation of total burn surface area is important since it is used for determining fluid resuscitation volumes, nutritional estimates and hospital admission criteria. Wallace's rule of nines is the most commonly used methods for this purpose. However, fat distribution is non-uniform and the total body surface area changes with obesity. The aim of this study was to determine if the rule of nines applies to all body mass index groups.

METHODS

A total of 217 individuals were included in the study. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their BMI (18.5-25kg/m² (60 persons)), 25-29.9kg/m² (61 individuals)), 30-34.9kg/m² (55 persons)), >35kg/m² (41 persons)). Each patient underwent a complete duel-energy X-ray absorptiometry body scan to determine the surface area (cm²) of the various regions of the body.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant variations between the Wallace body percentage distributions and our results in the men for all BMI ranges (head p=0.331, arms p=0.861, legs p=0.282, trunk p=0.696). In contrast, among women we found a statistically significant change in body surface area percentage distribution between the BMI groups and specific body regions (head p=0.000, legs p=0.000 and trunk p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Wallace rule of nines is a quick and acceptable method for estimating the total burn surface area percentage in men of all BMI ranges. However, for women, a more accurate method of burn area estimation is required as proposed by our BMI adjusted charts.

Perioperative in Intensive Medicine of reconstructive surgery and burned patients

Burned patients may need prolonged admissions in the Intensive Care Service, both for initial care and for the pre and postoperative treatment of the multiple surgeries they require. The initial resuscitation of critically burned patients requires adequate monitoring to calculate the fluid therapy necessary to replenish the losses and ensure tissue perfusion, but without excesses that increase interstitial edema. In addition, monitoring can evaluate the systemic inflammatory response that can lead to shock and organic dysfunctions. After this initial phase we will find a critical patient who requires multiple reinterventions in non-optimal situations, so he will need special care over a long period of time. In addition, the Intensive Care Service offers specific postoperative care for reconstructive surgery and the transplantation of composite tissues (upper limb and face) in which its success depends on a rigorous control through adequate monitoring and treatment.