Liberal red blood cell transfusions impair quality of life after cardiac surgery

Current perspective on fibrinogen concentrate in critical bleeding

INTRODUCTION

. Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates.

AREAS COVERED

. We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events.

EXPERT OPINION

. Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.

Relationship of thromboelastography and conventional clotting test values with severe bleeding in critically ill patients with coagulopathy: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to ascertain the associations of thromboelastography (TEG^® ) and standard laboratory test (SLTs) values with the presence of bleeding in critically ill patients with known coagulopathy.

METHODS

Three groups of coagulopathic patients with (a) hepatic failure, (b) postoperative period after prolonged cardiac surgery, and (c) complex abdominal surgery with sepsis were prospectively included in this study. On intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients were stratified into two groups according to whether they had major bleeding (MB) (evident overt bleeding, important bleeding apparent on imaging studies, and/or need for moderate-massive blood transfusion and hemodynamic instability). Blood samples were drawn for the SLTs (international normalized ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], platelet count, and fibrinogen level [Clauss]) and TEG whole blood coagulation assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the efficiency of TEG and SLTs for detecting bleeding. The correlations between SLTs and TEG parameters with similar coagulation profiles were evaluated by Spearman rank-order analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included, and bleeding was confirmed in 45 (54%). The fibrinogen level demonstrated the best accuracy for detecting bleeding with an area under the curve and 95% confidence intervals [AUC (95% CI)] of 0.74 (0.63-0.85) with the best cutoff value of ≤ 2 g/L. Regarding TEG-MA, the AUC (CI) obtained with the optimal cutoff value of ≤ 51 mm was 0.68 (0.56-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Both conventional clotting tests and TEG values were poorly associated with bleeding in this critically ill cohort of patients with coagulopathy.

Management of Perioperative Iron Deficiency Anemia

Preoperative anemia affects 30-40% of patients undergoing major surgery and is an independent risk factor for perioperative blood transfusion, morbidity, and mortality. Absolute or functional iron deficiency is its leading cause. Nonanemic hematinic deficiencies are also prevalent and may hamper preoperative hemoglobin optimization and/or recovery from postoperative anemia. As modifiable risk factors, anemia and hematinic deficiencies should be detected and corrected prior to major surgical procedures. Postoperative anemia is even more common (up to 80-90%) due to surgery-associated blood loss, inflammation-induced blunted erythropoiesis, and/or preexisting anemia. Preoperative oral iron may have a role in mild-to-moderate anemia, provided there is sufficient time (6-8 weeks) and adequate tolerance of oral preparations. Postoperative oral iron is of little value and rife with gastrointestinal adverse events. Intravenous iron should preferentially be used in cases of moderate-to-severe iron deficiency anemia, concomitant use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, short time to surgery or nonelective procedures, and for postoperative anemia management. Minor infusion reactions to intravenous iron are rare, the incidence of severe anaphylactic reactions is extremely low, and there is no increase in infections with intravenous iron. Currently available intravenous iron formulations allowing administration of large single doses are preferred.