Chronic disseminated candidiasis and acute leukemia: Impact on survival and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation agenda

Does 18F-FDG PET/CT add value to conventional imaging in clinical assessment of chronic disseminated candidiasis?

Background

Chronic disseminated candidiasis (CDC) classically occurs after profound and prolonged neutropenia. The aim of the CANHPARI study was to assess the clinical value of adding ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT to conventional radiology for initial and subsequent evaluations of CDC.

Materials and methods

A pilot prospective study was conducted in 23 French onco-hematological centers from 2013 to 2017 (NCT01916057). Patients ≥ 18 y.o. suspected for CDC on abdominal conventional imaging (CT or MRI) were included. PET/CT and conventional imaging were performed at baseline and month 3 (M3). Follow-up was assessed until M12. The primary outcome measure was the global response at M3, i.e., apyrexia and complete response to PET/CT. The secondary outcome measure consists in comparison between responses to PET/CT and conventional imaging at diagnosis and M3.

Results

Among 52 included patients, 44 were evaluable (20 probable and 24 possible CDC); 86% had acute leukemia, 55% were male (median age 47 years). At diagnosis, 34% had fever and conventional imaging was always abnormal with microabscesses on liver and spleen in 66%, liver in 25%, spleen in 9%. Baseline PET/CT showed metabolic uptake on liver and/or spleen in 84% but did not match with lesion localizations on conventional imaging in 32%. M3 PET/CT showed no metabolic uptake in 13 (34%) patients, 11 still having pathological conventional imaging. Global response at M3 was observed in eight patients.

Conclusion

Baseline PET/CT does not replace conventional imaging for initial staging of CDC lesions but should be performed after 3 months of antifungal therapy.

Clinical trial registration

[www.clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT01916057].

How I perform hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on patients with a history of invasive fungal disease

Hematopoietic transplantation is the preferred treatment for many patients with hematologic malignancies. Some patients may develop invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) during initial chemotherapy, which need to be considered when assessing patients for transplantation and treatment posttransplantation. Given the associated high risk of relapse and mortality in the post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) period, IFDs, especially invasive mold diseases, were historically considered a contraindication for HSCT. Over the last 3 decades, advances in antifungal drugs and early diagnosis have improved IFD outcomes, and HSCT in patients with a recent IFD has become increasingly common. However, an organized approach for performing transplantation in patients with a prior IFD is scarce, and decisions are highly individualized. Patient-, malignancy-, transplantation procedure-, antifungal treatment-, and fungus-specific issues affect the risk of IFD relapse. Effective surveillance to detect IFD relapse post-HSCT and careful drug selection for antifungal prophylaxis are of paramount importance. Antifungal drugs have their own toxicities and interact with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin inhibitors. Immune adjunct cytokine or cellular therapy and surgery can be considered in selected cases. In this review, we critically evaluate these factors and provide guidance for the complex decision making involved in the peri-HSCT management of these patients.