Searching beyond the usual papillomavirus suspects in squamous carcinomas of the vulva, penis and head and neck

Might Oral Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection in Healthy Individuals Explain Differences in HPV-Attributable Fractions in Oropharyngeal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Differences in oral human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and contrasts in HPV-attributable fractions (AFs) in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) have not been evaluated in depth.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies in which at least 50 healthy individuals were tested for oral HPV infection. Information on sex, age, tobacco/alcohol consumption, sex practices, specimen collection, HPV detection, and population type was extracted. Prevalences were pooled using random-effects models for meta-analyses of binomial data. Correlations were assessed by the Spearman test.

RESULTS

Forty-eight reports comprising 28 544 individuals fulfilled inclusion criteria. Global oral HPV prevalence was 4.9%. Estimates were highest in Europe, although regional differences were not statistically significant. HPV16 prevalence was 1.0% globally, and regional differences became statistically significant. A lifetime history of >6 sex partners showed a higher risk of oral HPV infection. The age-specific HPV distribution revealed a prevalence of ≥5% over 40 years of age and a lower prevalence at younger ages. There was no association between oral HPV prevalence and HPV-AFs or age-standardized rates (ASRs) of OPC, genital HPV in healthy women, or tobacco use.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in HPV-AFs or ASRs of OPC cannot be explained by differences in the prevalence of oral HPV infection across healthy populations. Consistent research on determinants of oral HPV prevalence, acquisition, clearance, and persistence is warranted.

Prevalence of human papillomavirus and its prognostic value in vulvar cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in vulvar cancer and determine whether positive HPV in vulvar cancer was associated with a better prognosis. Literature searches of Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were performed to identify related studies published from January 2000 to May 2017. A total of 33 studies including 7,721 subjects were selected in this meta-analysis. Overall, the HPV prevalence in vulvar cancer tissue was 34% (95% CI: 28%-39%) with 45% (95% CI: 28%-64%) in Asian populations and 34% (95% CI: 26%-42%) in Caucasian populations. The HPV-positive vulvar cancer was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.87; P = 0.004) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45–0.97; P = 0.03) compared with HPV-negative counterpart. HPV status may play an important role in predicting the prognosis of patients with vulvar cancer. The HPV-positive vulvar cancer women might relatively have a better survival than HPV-negative ones.