Can we measure surgical resilience?

Impact of Mental Health on General Surgery Patients and Strategies to Improve Outcomes

Mental Health Disorders (MHD) are a growing concern nationwide. The significant impact MHD have on surgical outcomes has only recently started to be understood. This literature review investigated how mental health impacts the outcomes of general surgery patients and what can be done to make improvements. Patients with schizophrenia had the poorest surgical outcomes. Mental health disorders increased post-surgical pain, hospital length of stay, complications, readmissions, and mortality. Mental health disorders decreased wound healing and quality of care. Optimizing outcomes will be best accomplished through integrating more effective perioperative screening tools and interventions. Screenings tools can incorporate artificial intelligence, MHD data, resilience and its biomarkers, and patient mental health questionnaires. Interventions include cognitive behavioral therapy, virtual reality, spirituality, pharmacology, and resilience training.

Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review

This narrative review presents a biological rationale and evidence to describe how the preoperative condition of the patient contributes to postoperative morbidity. Any preoperative condition that prevents a patient from tolerating the physiological stress of surgery (e.g. poor cardiopulmonary reserve, sarcopaenia), impairs the stress response (e.g. malnutrition, frailty), and/or augments the catabolic response to stress (e.g. insulin resistance) is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. Prehabilitation interventions that include exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial components can be applied before surgery to strengthen physiological reserve and enhance functional capacity, which, in turn, supports recovery through attaining surgical resilience. Prehabilitation complements Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care to achieve optimal patient outcomes because recovery is not a passive process and it begins preoperatively.

Effect of Patient Resilience and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score on Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Background

This study aims to determine the effect of resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and perceived self-efficacy of knee function, as measured by the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score on return to sport outcomes following ACL Reconstruction (ACLR) surgery.

Methods

Seventy-one patients undergoing ACLR surgery were followed up for a minimum of one year. At six-months post-op, ACLR patients completed the BRS and the SANE score. Patients were stratified into low, normal, and high resilience groups, and outcome scores were calculated.

Results

The median return to sports participation, in months post-operatively, for the low, normal, and high resiliency groups were 7.1, 7.3, and 7.2 months, respectively (P=0.78). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the SANE score was a significant predictor of return to sport at nine months when adjusted for age, sex, and BRS score (P=0.01). Patients that returned to sport by nine months demonstrated a mean SANE score of 92.7, compared to a mean of 85.7 (P=0.08). In patients who had returned to sport, neither the BRS resilience group nor the SANE score were significant predictors of the returned level of competition status (P=0.06; P=0.18).

Conclusion

The SANE score may serve as a significant predictor of return to sport when adjusted for age, sex, and BRS score. Resilience, as measured by the BRS, was not significantly associated with return to sport, but may have utility in specific patient populations.