High meniscal slope angle as a risk factor for meniscal allograft extrusion

Assessment of Anatomic Restoration and Clinical Outcomes Between Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

Background:

Proper anatomic restoration is an important consideration for meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), even with the different anatomica characteristics between the medial meniscus and lateral meniscus.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of anatomic restoration in medial and lateral MAT (MMAT and LMAT) procedures and to compare their outcomes. We hypothesized that (1) the anatomic differences between the medial and lateral menisci will mean a less accurate anatomic restoration for MMAT and (2) clinical outcomes after MMAT will be inferior compared with LMAT.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 20 patients who underwent MMAT using the bone plug technique and 21 patients who underwent LMAT using the keyhole technique at a single institution from July 2014 to June 2019. Demographic data, previous surgeries, and concomitant procedures were recorded, as were lower limb alignment and osteoarthritis grade on radiographs. Using preoperative and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, the meniscal position, rotation, extrusion, and intrameniscal signal intensity were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores.

Results:

The mean follow-up was 41.15 ± 18.86 and 45.43 ± 21.32 months for the MMAT and LMAT patients, respectively. Concomitant procedures were performed in 90% of MMATs and 15% of LMATs. There was no significant difference between the native and postoperative root positions after LMAT; however, for MMAT, the position of the anterior root was located significantly posteriorly (P = .002) and medially (P = .007) compared with preoperatively. In addition, the allograft medial meniscus was restored in a more internally rotated position (P = .029). MMATs also exhibited significantly increased meniscal extrusion compared with LMATs (posterior horn, P < .001; midbody, P = .027; anterior horn, P = .006). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at final follow-up in intrameniscal signal intensity or clinical scores.

Conclusion:

LMAT showed higher accuracy than MMAT in restoring meniscal position and rotation, and there was less meniscal extrusion. However, clinical scores improved after both LMAT and MMAT compared with preoperative values, and midterm clinical outcomes were similar. The small anatomical errors seen in the MMAT technique were not clinically relevant at midterm follow-up.

Clinical significance and management of meniscal extrusion in different knee pathologies: a comprehensive review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The menisci are crescent-shaped, fibrocartilaginous structures that play a crucial role in the load transition and distribution of the contact forces along the tibiofemoral articulation. Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a radiological finding, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for which there has been growing interest in recent years. ME, in the coronary plane, is defined as the maximum distance of the most distal end of the meniscus from the border of the tibial plateau, where the tibial eminences are the most prominent, without taking into account the osteophytes. Although there is still controversy in the literature in respect of the optimal cutoff value, a threshold of 3 mm is considered significant. ME has no specific clinical finding or sign and it is encountered in many knee pathologies. It is associated with either rapidly progressive knee osteoarthritis or early onset of knee osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. In this review, we delineate the clinical significance of ME in various knee pathologies, as well as when, why and how it should be managed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elaborate on these topics.

Variations of cross-sectional meniscal morphology between similar-sized menisci: implications on donor selection for meniscal allograft transplantation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the morphological variations in the cross-sectional anatomy of the meniscus between similar-sized matched menisci.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Knee MRI of 329 patients with intact menisci were retrospectively reviewed, and the meniscal length (ML), meniscal width (MW), and cross-sectional dimensions (meniscal height and width) of the anterior, posterior horns, and the corpus were measured. Patients with similar-sized menisci who had less than 1 mm difference in ML and MW were matched. 330 male-to-male medial menisci (MM), 623 male-to-male lateral menisci (LM), 82 female-to-female MM, 233 female-to-female LM, 176 cross-gender MM, and 265 cross-gender LM unique combination of ideally matched pairs (total: 1709) were generated. The disparity in the cross-sectional dimensions, absolute difference, and the paired percent differences was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The ML and MW in all groups were statistically similar, with a predefined absolute difference of 1 mm both for ML and MW (paired percent difference < 5%). The cross-sectional segmental meniscal dimensions were similar within all groups, but the paired percent differences showed high variations between a mean of 12.1-21.5% and up to 150.9%. The paired percent difference of MM in each segmental dimension was similar among different gender combinations. However, segmental paired percent differences of LM showed statistical differences in anterior horn width (AHW) (p: 0.001) and posterior horn width (PHW) (p: 0.001). In subgroup comparisons, the paired percent difference of AHW was higher in the female-to-female group compared to cross-gender (p: 0.023) and male-to-male groups (p: 0.001). The paired percent difference of PHW was smaller in the male-to-male group compared to female-to-female and cross-gender groups (p: 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental cross-sectional anatomy showed wide variations despite strict matching in ML and MW. These variations were present in all gender combinations. The meniscal 3D shape is unique, but acceptable limits of similarity need further research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level III.

Is Lateral Posterior Tibial Slope Correlated With Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Meniscus Allograft Transplantation?

PURPOSE

To investigate (1) the correlation between lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS) and clinical outcomes of lateral meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) and (2) the difference of lateral PTS between the extrusion and nonextrusion groups or between the failure and nonfailure groups in lateral MAT.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and February 2016, we retrospectively evaluated 61 patients (mean age, 29.1 ± 12.2 years) who underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were followed for a minimum of 2 years after primary lateral MAT. The lateral PTS and graft extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes were assessed by using MRI performed at 1 year postoperatively. Clinical scores and graft failure were evaluated at the last follow-up visit. The correlation between lateral PTS and clinical outcomes (clinical scores, graft extrusion) was analyzed. Lateral PTS was compared between the extrusion and nonextrusion groups and between the failure and nonfailure groups.

RESULTS

Mean lateral PTS on MRI was 6.6° ± 3.1° (range, 0.8° to 15.7°). A significant correlation was not identified between lateral PTS and clinical outcomes (clinical scores, graft extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes). A significant difference in lateral PTS was not identified between the extrusion and nonextrusion groups in the coronal (6.2° ± 2.5° vs 7.0° ± 3.4°, P = .400) and sagittal (anterior horn, 6.5° ± 2.3° vs 6.7° ± 3.7°, P = .988; posterior horn, 6.8° ± 3.5° vs 6.5° ± 2.7°, P = .771) planes. Moreover, a significant difference was not identified between the failure and nonfailure groups (7.5° ± 3.3° vs 6.4° ± 3.0°, P = .388).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant correlation between lateral PTS and clinical or radiologic outcomes of lateral MAT was not identified.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series with subgroup analysis.

The influence of a change in the meniscus cross-sectional shape on the medio-lateral translation of the knee joint and meniscal extrusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of a change in the meniscus cross sectional shape on its position and on the biomechanics of a knee joint.

METHODS

One main finite element model of a left knee joint was created on the basis of MRI images. The model consisted of bones, articular cartilages, menisci and ligaments. Eight variants of this model with an increased or decreased meniscus height were then prepared. Nonlinear static analyses with a fixed flexion/extension movement for a compressive load of 1000 N were performed. The additional analyses for those models with a constrained medio-lateral relative bone translation allowed for an evaluation of the influence of this translation on a meniscus external shift.

RESULTS

It was observed that a decrease in the meniscus height caused a decrease in the contact area, together with a decrease in the contact force between the flattened meniscus and the cartilage. For the models with an increased meniscus height, a maximal value of force acting on the meniscus in a medio-lateral direction was obtained. The results have shown that the meniscus external shift was approximately proportional to the meniscus slope angle, but that relationship was modified by a medio-lateral relative bone translation. It was found that the translation of the femur relative to the tibia may be dependent on the geometry of the menisci.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have suggested that a change in the meniscus geometry in the cross sectional plane can considerably affect not only the meniscal external shift, but also the medio-lateral translation of the knee joint as well as the congruency of the knee joint.