A mathematical model predicting the individual outcome of IVF through sperm-analysis: The role of the HaloSpermG2® DNA fragmentation test

A systematic review identifying fertility biomarkers in semen: a clinical approach through Omics to diagnose male infertility

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most robust molecular biomarkers in sperm and seminal plasma for the diagnosis of male infertility, and to evaluate their clinical use.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Accessible studies reporting well-defined (in)fertile populations and semen molecular biomarkers were included in this review.

INTERVENTION(S)

A systematic search of the literature published in MEDLINE-PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was the content, expression, or activity of molecular biomarkers in human semen samples. Only studies reporting a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis values were included.

RESULT(S)

Eighty-nine studies were included. Direct evaluation of sperm DNA damage has high potential as a diagnostic biomarker of fertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes (area under the curve [AUCs] median = 0.67). Regarding strand break-associated chromatin modifications, γH2AX levels show good predictive value for the diagnosis of male infertility (AUCs median = 0.93). Some noncoding ribonucleic acid (RNA) exhibit excellent predictive values; miR-34c-5p in semen is the most well-characterized and robust transcriptomic biomarker (AUCs median = 0.78). While many proteins in semen show fair diagnostic value for sperm quality and fertilizing capacity, the levels of some, such as TEX101, in seminal plasma have an excellent diagnostic potential (AUCs median = 0.69). Although individual metabolites and metabolomic profiles in seminal plasma present good predictive value, the latter seem to be better than the former when inferring sperm quality and fertilizing capacity.

CONCLUSION(S)

The current review supports that some Omics (e.g., DNA structure and integrity, genomics and epigenomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics) could be considered relevant molecular biomarkers that may help identify infertility etiologies and fertilization prognosis with cost-effective, simple, and accurate diagnosis.

The effect of flexible low-dose GnRH antagonist on pregnancy outcome in the fresh embryo transfer cycle of IVF-ET: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To explore the practicality and effectiveness of a flexible low-dose protocol in the fresh embryo transfer cycle: reducing the total amount of antagonist by increasing the interval between administrations of Cetrotide.

METHODS

A total of 211 patients with normal ovarian reserve who accepted GnRH-ant protocol for IVF-ET were selected, and they were randomized to the flexible low-dose antagonist group (test group, n = 101) or the conventional dose antagonist group (control group, n = 110). The initial dose of Cetrotide in the test group was 0.25 mg every other day, and then the dose was adjusted to 0.25 mg every day based on the subsequent luteinizing hormone (LH) levels. The dosage of Cetrotide in the control group was 0.25 mg per day. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of premature LH rise, total dosage of Cetrotide, number of oocytes retrieved, number of fertilized oocytes, number of high-quality embryos, biochemical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the general condition of the two groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (51.49% vs. 48.18%, p = 0.632) or the incidence of premature LH rise (18.81% vs. 15.45%, p = 0.584) between the two groups. However, the amount of Cetrotide used in the test group was significantly lower than that in the conventional dose antagonist group (1.13 ± 0.41 vs. 1.61 ± 0.59 mg, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The flexible low-dose antagonist protocol and the conventional dose antagonist protocol were equally effective in people with a normal ovarian reserve in the fresh embryo transfer cycle of IVF-ET.

Advances in sperm analysis: techniques, discoveries and applications

Infertility affects one in six couples worldwide, and fertility continues to deteriorate globally, partly owing to a decline in semen quality. Sperm analysis has a central role in diagnosing and treating male factor infertility. Many emerging techniques, such as digital holography, super-resolution microscopy and next-generation sequencing, have been developed that enable improved analysis of sperm motility, morphology and genetics to help overcome limitations in accuracy and consistency, and improve sperm selection for infertility treatment. These techniques have also improved our understanding of fundamental sperm physiology by enabling discoveries in sperm behaviour and molecular structures. Further progress in sperm analysis and integrating these techniques into laboratories and clinics requires multidisciplinary collaboration, which will increase discovery and improve clinical outcomes.

Addition of procyanidine to semen preserves progressive sperm motility up to three hours of incubation

Several studies on semen physiology and sperm fertilizing capacity have shown a beneficial effect of antioxidants. Procyanidine is a natural antioxidant, more efficient compared with vitamin C and E, with many applications in the food, agriculture, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry. Thus, we tested whether the addition of procyanidine to the semen of infertile men has a beneficial effect on spermatozoa during their in vitro incubation and during the cryopreservation process. Semen samples of 25 infertile men were divided in to two aliquots, in which procyanidine was added or not. Semen analysis, measurement of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were performed 3 h after incubation at 37 °C and after sperm cryopreservation and thawing. In-vitro addition of procyanidine to semen of infertile men resulted in a lesser decrease in progressive motility [-4 (-31:+6) vs. -6 (-31:+5), p < 0.001] and total motility [-5 (-29:+3) vs. -9 (-32:+2), p < 0.001] after 3 h of incubation compared with no addition of procyanidine. Sperm morphology was decreased only in the control group after 3 h of incubation [2 (0:+6) vs. 1 (0:+4), p = 0.009]. Furthermore, a larger increase in sperm DFI was observed in the control compared with the procyanidine group [9 (-7:+27) vs. 3 (-3:+18), p = 0.005] after thawing of cryopreserved semen samples. In conclusion, in-vitro addition of procyanidine to the semen of infertile men exerts a protective effect on progressive motility during handling and after 3 h of incubation as well as on sperm DFI during the process of cryopreservation.