Barrier-Mediated Pulsatile Release

User-designed device with programmable release profile for localized treatment

Three-dimensional printing enables precise and on-demand manufacture of customizable drug delivery systems to advance healthcare toward the goal of personalized medicine. However, major challenges remain in realizing personalized drug delivery that fits a patient-specific drug dosing schedule using local drug delivery systems. In this study, a user-designed device is developed as implantable therapeutics that can realize personalized drug release kinetics by programming the inner structural design on the microscale. The drug release kinetics required for various treatments, including dose-dense therapy and combination therapy, can be implemented by controlling the dosage and combination of drugs along with the rate, duration, initiation time, and time interval of drug release according to the device layer design. After implantation of the capsular device in mice, the in vitro-in vivo and pharmacokinetic evaluation of the device is performed, and the therapeutic effect of the developed device is achieved through the local release of doxorubicin. The developed user-designed device provides a novel platform for developing next-generation drug delivery systems for personalized and localized therapy.

Design of a Time-Controlled Pulsatile Release System for Propranolol Using the Dry-Coated Method: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

The objective of this study was to design a time-controlled pulsatile release (TCPR) system containing propranolol (PNH) as an active pharmaceutical ingredient. Here, the developed dosage forms were coated with hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) and other excipients as barrier layer using dry-coated technology. The influence of HPMC, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), and lactose in the outer coating and the coating weight on drug release were investigated. Then, a three-factor, five-level central composite design (CCD) and response surface method were used to optimize the formula of the coating. After data processing, the optimal prescription was found to be as follows: HPMC E50(X₁) 86.2 mg, MCC(X₂) 43.8 mg, and lactose (X₃) 21.3 mg in the coating. Moreover, the in vitro tests showed that the optimized formulation of TCPR had a lag time of 4 h followed by a 4-h drug release. Also, determination of the extent of erosion of the TCPR tablets revealed that the lag time is related to the coating erosion speed. The in vivo test in beagle dogs and comparison of the parameters for the TCPR tablets and reference preparations showed significant differences for T_max (7.83 ± 0.408 and 2 ± 0.00) and C_max (185.45 ± 28.561 and 587 ± 45.27 ng/ml) but no significant differences in the AUC_0-∞ (1757.876 ± 208.832 and 1779.69 ± 229.02 ng h/ml). These results demonstrated that the TCPR tablets successfully prolonged the lag time and controlled the release of propranolol.