Current knowledge on molecular mechanisms of microorganism-mediated bioremediation for arsenic contamination: A review

Remediation of arsenic- and nitrate-contaminated groundwater through iron-dependent autotrophic denitrifying culture

Groundwater contamination with arsenic and nitrate poses a pressing concern for the safety of local communities. Bioremediation, utilizing Fe(II)-oxidizing nitrate reducing bacteria, shows promise as a solution to this problem. However, the relatively weak environmental adaptability of a single bacterium hampers practical application. Therefore, this study explored the feasibility and characteristics of a mixed iron-dependent autotrophic denitrifying (IDAD) culture for effectively removing arsenic and nitrate from synthetic groundwater. The IDAD biosystem exhibited stable performace and arsenic resistance, even at a high As(III) concentration of 800 μg/L. Although the nitrogen removal efficiency of the IDAD biosystem decreased from 71.4% to 64.7% in this case, the arsenic concentration in the effluent remained below the standard (10 μg/L) set by WHO. The crystallinity of the lepidocrocite produced by the IDAD culture decreased with increasing arsenic concentration, but the relative abundance of the key iron-oxidizing bacteria norank_f_Gallionellaceae in the culture showed an opposite trend. Metagenomic analysis revealed that the IDAD culture possess arsenic detoxification pathways, including redox, methylation, and efflux of arsenic, which enable it to mitigate the adverse impact of arsenic stress. This study provides theoretical understanding and technical support for the remediation of arsenic and nitrate-contaminated groundwater using the IDAD culture.

Can Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryote also oxidize As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and vice versa?

Sb(III) and As(III) share similar chemical features and coexist in the environment. However, their oxidase enzymes have completely different sequences and structures. This raises an intriguing question: Could Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOPs) also oxidize As(III), and vice versa? Regarding this issue, previous investigations have yielded unclear, incorrect and even conflicting data. This work aims to address this matter. First, we prepared an enriched population of SOPs that comprises 55 different AnoA genes, lacking AioAB and ArxAB genes. We found that these SOPs can oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) with comparable capabilities. To further confirm this finding, we isolated three cultivable SOP strains that have AnoA gene, but lack AioAB and ArxAB genes. We observed that they also oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Secondly, we obtained an enriched population of As(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (AOPs) from As-contaminated soils, which comprises 69 different AioA genes, lacking AnoA gene. We observed that the AOP population has significant As(III)-oxidizing activities, but lack detectable Sb(III)-oxidizing activities under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Therefore, we convincingly show that SOPs can oxidize As(III), but AOPs cannot oxidize Sb(III). These findings clarify the previous ambiguities, confusion, errors or contradictions regarding how SOPs and AOPs oxidize each other's substrate.

Synthetic bacteria designed using ars operons: a promising solution for arsenic biosensing and bioremediation

The global concern over arsenic contamination in water due to its natural occurrence and human activities has led to the development of innovative solutions for its detection and remediation. Microbial metabolism and mobilization play crucial roles in the global cycle of arsenic. Many microbial arsenic-resistance systems, especially the ars operons, prevalent in bacterial plasmids and genomes, play vital roles in arsenic resistance and are utilized as templates for designing synthetic bacteria. This review novelty focuses on the use of these tailored bacteria, engineered with ars operons, for arsenic biosensing and bioremediation. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using synthetic bacteria in arsenic pollution treatment. We highlight the importance of genetic circuit design, reporter development, and chassis cell optimization to improve biosensors' performance. Bacterial arsenic resistances involving several processes, such as uptake, transformation, and methylation, engineered in customized bacteria have been summarized for arsenic bioaccumulation, detoxification, and biosorption. In this review, we present recent insights on the use of synthetic bacteria designed with ars operons for developing tailored bacteria for controlling arsenic pollution, offering a promising avenue for future research and application in environmental protection.

Functional features of a novel Sb(III)- and As(III)-oxidizing bacterium: Implications for the interactions between bacterial Sb(III) and As(III) oxidation pathways

Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) share similar chemical characteristics and commonly coexist in contaminated environments. It has been reported that the biogeochemical cycles of antimony and arsenic affect each other. However, there is limited understanding regarding microbial coupling between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic. Here, we aimed to solve this issue. We successfully isolated a novel bacterium, Shinella sp. SbAsOP1, which possesses both Sb(III) and As(III) oxidase, and can effectively oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. SbAsOP1 exhibits greater aerobic oxidation activity for the oxidation of As(III) or Sb(III) compared to its anaerobic activity. SbAsOP1 also significantly catalyzes the oxidative mobilization of solid-phase Sb(III) under aerobic conditions. The activity of SbAsOP1 in oxidizing solid Sb(III) is 3 times lower than its activity in oxidizing soluble form. It is noteworthy that, in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic conditions, either As(III) or Sb(III) significantly inhibits the oxidation of Sb(III) or As(III), respectively. In comparison, under anaerobic conditions and in the coexistence of Sb(III) and As(III), As(III) significantly inhibits Sb(III) oxidation, whereas Sb(III) almost completely inhibits As(III) oxidation. These findings suggest that under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, SbAsOP1 demonstrates a partial preference for Sb(III) oxidation. Additionally, bacterial oxidations of Sb(III) and As(III) mutually inhibit each other to varying degrees. These observations gain a novel understanding of the interplay between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic.

Leptolyngbya sp. XZMQ and Bacillus XZM co-inoculation reduced sunflower arsenic toxicity by regulating rhizosphere microbial structure and enzyme activity

Microorganisms are of great significance for arsenic (As) toxicity amelioration in plants as soil fertility is directly affected by microbes. In this study, we innovatively explored the effects of indigenous cyanobacteria (Leptolyngbya sp. XZMQ) and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) (Bacillus XZM) on the growth and As absorption of sunflower plants from As-contaminated soil. Results showed that single inoculation and co-inoculation stimulated the growth of sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.), enhanced enzyme activities, and reduced As contents. In comparison to the control group, single innoculation of microalgae and bacteria in the rhizosphere increased extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by 21.99% and 14.36%, respectively, whereas co-inoculation increased them by 35%. Compared with the non-inoculated group, As concentration in the roots, stems and leaves of sunflower plants decreased by 38%, 70% and 41%, respectively, under co-inoculation conditions. Inoculation of Leptolyngbya sp. XZMQ significantly increased the abundance of nifH in soil, while co-inoculation of cyanobacteria and Bacillus XZM significantly increased the abundance of cbbL, indicating that the coupling of Leptolyngbya sp. XZMQ and Bacillus XZM could stimulate the activity of nitrogen-fixing and carbon-fixing microorganisms and increased soil fertility. Moreover, this co-inoculation increased the enzyme activities (catalase, sucrase, urease) in the rhizosphere soil of sunflower and reduced the toxic effect of As on plant. Among these, the activities of catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase decreased. Meanwhile, co-inoculation enables cyanobacteria and bacteria to attach and entangle in the root area of the plant and develop as symbiotic association, which reduced As toxicity. Co-inoculation increased the abundance of aioA, arrA, arsC, and arsM genes in soil, especially the abundance of microorganisms with aioA and arsM, which reduced the mobility and bioavailability of As in soil, hence, reduced the absorption of As by plants. This study provides a theoretical basis for soil microbial remediation in mining areas.

Arsenic and Microorganisms: Genes, Molecular Mechanisms, and Recent Advances in Microbial Arsenic Bioremediation

Throughout history, cases of arsenic poisoning have been reported worldwide, and the highly toxic effects of arsenic to humans, plants, and animals are well documented. Continued anthropogenic activities related to arsenic contamination in soil and water, as well as its persistency and lethality, have allowed arsenic to remain a pollutant of high interest and concern. Constant scrutiny has eventually resulted in new and better techniques to mitigate it. Among these, microbial remediation has emerged as one of the most important due to its reliability, safety, and sustainability. Over the years, numerous microorganisms have been successfully shown to remove arsenic from various environmental matrices. This review provides an overview of the interactions between microorganisms and arsenic, the different mechanisms utilized by microorganisms to detoxify arsenic, as well as current trends in the field of microbial-based bioremediation of arsenic. While the potential of microbial bioremediation of arsenic is notable, further studies focusing on the field-scale applicability of this technology is warranted.

Structural-functional analysis and molecular characterization of arsenate reductase from Enterobacter cloacae RSC3 for arsenic biotransformation

Enterobacter cloacae RSC3 isolated from an industrial pesticide site transformed arsenate into arsenite. The arsenate is transported by membrane-bound phosphate transporter and transformed to arsenite by arsenate reductase (arsC). E. cloacae RSC3 produced an arsenate reductase enzyme with a maximum activity of 354 U after 72 h of incubation. Arsenate reductase was found to be active and stable at a wide range of temperatures (20 and 45 °C) and pH (5-10), with maximum activity at 35 °C and pH 7.0. The arsenate reductase protein was further characterised molecularly using different bioinformatics tools. The 3D structure of ArsC protein was predicted by homology modelling and validated by the Ramachandran plot with 91.9% residues in the most favoured region. ArsC protein of E. cloacae RSC3 revealed structural homology with ArsC from PDB ID: 1S3C. The gene ontology results also showed that the ArsC protein had a molecular functionality of the arsenate reductase (glutaredoxin) activity and the biological function of cellular response to DNA damage stimulus. Molecular docking analysis of 3D structures using AutoDock vina-1.5.7 server predicted four ligand binding active site residues at Gln70, Asp68, Leu68, and Leu63. Strong ArsC-arsenate ion interaction was observed with binding energy -1.03 kcal/mol, indicating significant arsenate reductase activity and specificity of ArsC protein. On the basis of molecular dynamics simulation analysis, the RMSD and RMSF values revealed the stability of ArsC protein from E. cloacae RSC3.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-023-03730-9.

Detoxification and removal of arsenite by Pseudomonas sp. SMS11: Oxidation, biosorption and bioaccumulation

Arsenite [As(III)] oxidizing bacteria have been widely studied for their detoxification ability through transforming As(III) into arsenate [As(V)]. However, few was focused on removal capacity of arsenic (As). In the current study, As(III) oxidation accompanied with removal of total As was observed in Pseudomonas sp. SMS11. The biosorption (unbinding and surface binding) and bioaccumulation (intracellular uptake) of As by the cells were investigated. Biosorption isotherm was defined adequately by Langmuir and Freundlich models. Biosorption kinetics was recommended by pseudo second-order model. For comparison, the bacteria were inoculated in pure water or culture media amended with different concentrations of As(III) to evaluate the remediation capacity without or with bacterial growth. After removing unbound As, surface bound and intracellular As were sequentially separated using EDTA elution and acidic extraction from bacterial cells. Without bacterial growth, oxidation of As(III) was retarded and the maximum values of surface bound and intracellular As were 4.8 and 10.5 mg/g, respectively. Efficient oxidation and high adsorption capacity were observed after bacterial growth. The surface bound and intracellular As achieved up to 555.0 and 2421.5 mg/g, respectively. Strain SMS11 exhibited great accumulation capacity of As in aqueous solutions, indicating potential application in detoxification and removal of As(III) contamination. The results also suggested that bioremediation via bacteria should be based on living cells and bacterial growth rate.

Remediation effect and mechanism of low-As-accumulating maize and peanut intercropping for safe-utilization of As-contaminated soil

Phytoremediation by intercropping is a potential method to realize both production and remediation. Maize and peanut are the main crops planted in arsenic(As) contaminated areas in south China and vulnerable to As pollution. Experiments were conducted on arsenic-polluted soil with low As-accumulating maize monoculture (M), peanut monoculture (P), and intercropping with different distances between the maize and peanut (0.2 m, 0.35 m, and 0.5 m, recorded as MP0.2, MP0.35, and MP0.5, respectively). The results indicated that the As content in the maize grains and peanut lipids in the intercropping system decreased significantly, meeting the food safety standard of China (GB 2762-2017). Moreover, the land equivalent ratio (LER) and heavy metal removal equivalence ratio (MRER) of all intercropping treatments were greater than 1, indicating that this intercropping agrosystem has the advantage of production and arsenic removal, among which the yield and LER of MP0.35 treatment were the highest. Additionally, the bioconcentration factors (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) of MP0.2 increased by 117.95% and 16.89%, respectively, indicating that the root interaction affected the absorption of As in soil by crops. This study preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility of this intercropping system to safely use and remedy arsenic-contaminated farmland during production.

Perspectives of nanomaterials in microbial remediation of heavy metals and their environmental consequences: A review

Nanomaterials (NMs) have diverse applications in various sectors, such as decontaminating heavy metals from drinking water, wastewater, and soil. Their degradation efficiency can be enhanced through the application of microbes. As microbial strain releases enzymes, which leads to the degradation of HMs. Therefore, nanotechnology and microbial-assisted remediation-based methods help us develop a remediation process with practical utility, speed, and less environmental toxicity. This review focuses on the success achieved for the bioremediation of heavy metals by nanoparticles and microbial strains and in their integrated approach. Still, the use of NMs and heavy metals (HMs) can negatively affect the health of living organisms. This review describes various aspects of the bioremediation of heavy materials using microbial nanotechnology. Their safe and specific use supported by bio-based technology paves the way for their better remediation. We discuss the utility of nanomaterials for removing heavy metals from wastewater, toxicity studies and issues to the environment with their practical implications. Nanomaterial assisted heavy metal degradation coupled with microbial technology and disposal issues are described along with detection methods. Environmental impact of nanomaterials is also discussed based on the recent work conducted by the researchers. Therefore, this review opens new avenues for future research with an impact on the environment and toxicity issues. Also, applying new biotechnological tools will help us develop better heavy metal degradation routes.

Biotechnology Advances in Bioremediation of Arsenic: A Review

Arsenic is a highly toxic metalloid widespread in the Earth's crust, and its contamination due to different anthropogenic activities (application of agrochemicals, mining, waste management) represents an emerging environmental issue. Therefore, different sustainable and effective remediation methods and approaches are needed to prevent and protect humans and other organisms from detrimental arsenic exposure. Among numerous arsenic remediation methods, those supported by using microbes as sorbents (microbial remediation), and/or plants as green factories (phytoremediation) are considered as cost-effective and environmentally-friendly bioremediation. In addition, recent advances in genetic modifications and biotechnology have been used to develop (i) more efficient transgenic microbes and plants that can (hyper)accumulate or detoxify arsenic, and (ii) novel organo-mineral materials for more efficient arsenic remediation. In this review, the most recent insights from arsenic bio-/phytoremediation are presented, and the most relevant physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in arsenic biological routes, which can be useful starting points in the creation of more arsenic-tolerant microbes and plants, as well as their symbiotic associations are discussed.

Insights into remediation effects and bacterial diversity of different remediation measures in rare earth mine soil with SO4 2- and heavy metals

The increased demand for rare earth resources has led to an increase in the development of rare earth mines (REMs). However, the production of high-concentration leaching agents (SO₄ ^2-) and heavy metals as a result of rare earth mining has increased, necessitating the removal of contaminants. Here, a series of experiments with different remediation measures, including control (CK), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) alone (M), chemicals (Ca(OH)₂, 1.5 g/kg) plus SRB (CM-L), chemicals (Ca(OH)₂, 3.0 g/kg) plus SRB (CM-M), and chemicals (Ca(OH)₂, 4.5 g/kg) plus SRB (CM-H), were conducted to investigate the removal effect of SO₄ ^2-, Pb, Zn, and Mn from the REM soil. Then, a high-throughput sequencing technology was applied to explore the response of bacterial community diversity and functions with different remediation measures. The results indicated that CM-M treatment had a more efficient removal effect for SO₄ ^2-, Pb, Zn, and Mn than the others, up to 94.6, 88.3, 98.7, and 91%, respectively. Soil bacterial abundance and diversity were significantly affected by treatments with the inoculation of SRB in comparison with CK. The relative abundance of Desulfobacterota with the ability to transform SO₄ ^2- into S^2- increased significantly in all treatments, except for CK. There was a strong correlation between environmental factors (pH, Eh, SO₄ ^2-, Pb, and Zn) and bacterial community structure. Furthermore, functional prediction analysis revealed that the SRB inoculation treatments significantly increased the abundance of sulfate respiration, sulfite respiration, and nitrogen fixation, while decreasing the abundance of manganese oxidation, dark hydrogen oxidation, and denitrification. This provides good evidence for us to understand the difference in removal efficiency, bacterial community structure, and function by different remediation measures that help select a more efficient and sustainable method to remediate contaminants in the REM soil.

Comparisons of four As(V)-respiring bacteria from contaminated aquifers: activities to respire soluble As(V) and to reductively mobilize solid As(V)

It was shown that dissimilatory arsenate[As(V)]-respiring prokaryotes (DARPs) play important roles in driving the formation of arsenic-contaminated groundwater. However, because it is tough to isolate cultivable DARPs, the physiological and functional features of DARPs have not been fully elucidated yet; this impedes a deep understanding of the mechanisms for the dynamic fluctuations of As concentrations in contaminated groundwater. Here, four new DARPs were isolated from As-contaminated aquifers using the microbial enrichment technique, which were referred to as Bacillus sp Z01, Bacillus sp. Z02. Achromobacter sp. Z03 and Intrasporangium sp. Z04. We found that the presence of As(V) significantly inhibited the growth of Z03 and Z04, but promoted the growth of Z01 and Z02. The four strains possess significant As(V)-, NO₃^-- and Fe(III)-respiring activities; however, their activities and preferred electron donors differ greatly. NO₃^- was finally reduced to NO₂^- by Z01 and Z02, and to N₂O and N₂ by Z03 and Z04. The optimal pH value for their As(V)-respiring activity was 5 for Z01, and 4 for Z02, Z03 and Z04, whereas their optimal temperature varied between 30 and 37 °C. Microcosm assays with As-contaminated sediments and scorodite suggested that the four DARP strains had highly differential activities to reduce and mobilize solid As(V) under anaerobic conditions. Although the four DARPs have high soluble As(V)-respiring activities, their activities to mobilize solid As are negligibly low, accounting for only 0.006-0.484% of their each corresponding soluble As(V)-respiring activity. Moreover, extreme inconsistency between the size orders of their activities to respire soluble As(V) and to catalyze As reductive mobilization was observed. It is interesting to see that Z04 had high As(V)-respiring activity, but had little ability to catalyze the reductive mobilization of As and Fe. These observations suggest that As(V)-respiring activity is required, but not enough to catalyze the reductive mobilization of solid As(V). These findings provide new knowledge about the physiological and functional features of DARPs, and are helpful for a better understanding of the roles of DARPs in reductive mobilization and release of As from solid phase into groundwater.