The effect of adduction energy and intramolecular bonding in the mobility of dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine with 2-butanol in the buffer gas in ion mobility spectrometry

Using gas-phase chloride attachment for selective detection of morphine in a morphine/codeine mixture by ion mobility spectrometry

RATIONALE

Morphine and codeine are two important compounds of the opiate family that have vast applications in medicine. Several techniques have been reported for the determination of these opiates. Although ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in positive ion mode can be applied for detection of both morphine and codeine, this technique on its own cannot detect a mixture of these two compounds because of the overlapping of their peaks.

METHODS

An IMS instrument equipped with a corona discharge ion source operating in negative ion mode was used for the detection of anionic clusters of morphine and codeine. In normal negative ion mode, NO_x ^- , CO₃ ^- , and O_n ^- act as the main reactant ions (RIs) which can deprotonate the analytes. We also used chloroform as a dopant to produce Cl^- as an alternative RI.

RESULTS

Morphine has a phenolic and an alcoholic OH group, while codeine bears only an alcoholic OH group. Because the phenolic OH group is more acidic, only morphine is deprotonated in negative ion mode in a morphine/codeine mixture. Furthermore, since morphine has two OH groups that can act as hydrogen-bond donors, it acts as an anion receptor. Hence, in the presence of chloroform where Cl^- acts as the RI, morphine traps the Cl^- anion to form a morphine-Cl^- (Mor.Cl^- ) adduct ion, while because of its structure codeine does not have this capability.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the difference in the structures of morphine and codeine, two ionization methods were proposed for selective detection of morphine. Morphine is more acidic than codeine and has greater anion-receiving capability than codeine. Hence, it can both be deprotonated and form a adduct anion with Cl^- . The Cl^- attachment method is recommended for measurements at ambient temperature.

Mechanism of atmospheric pressure chemical ionization of morphine, codeine, and thebaine in corona discharge-ion mobility spectrometry: Protonation, ammonium attachment, and carbocation formation

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionizations (APCIs) of morphine, codeine, and thebaine were studied in a corona discharge ion source using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) at temperature range of 100°C-200°C. Density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) and M062X/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory were used to interpret the experimental data. It was found that in the presence of H₃ O⁺ as reactant ion (RI), ionization of morphine and codeine proceeds via both the protonation and carbocation formation, whereas thebaine participates only in protonation. Carbocation formation (fragmentation) was diminished with decrease in the temperature. At lower temperatures, proton-bound dimers of the compounds were also formed. Ammonia was used as a dopant to produce NH₄ ⁺ as an alternative RI. In the presence of NH₄ ⁺ , proton transfer from ammonium ion to morphine, codeine, and thebaine was the dominant mechanism of ionization. However, small amount of ammonium attachment was also observed. The theoretical calculations showed that nitrogen atom of the molecules is the most favorable proton acceptor site while the oxygen atoms participate in ammonium attachment. Furthermore, formation of the carbocations is because of the water elimination from the protonated forms of morphine and codeine.

Buffer gas additives (modifiers/shift reagents) in ion mobility spectrometry: Applications, predictions of mobility shifts, and influence of interaction energy and structure

Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is an analytical technique used for fast and sensitive detection of illegal substances in customs and airports, diagnosis of diseases through detection of metabolites in breath, fundamental studies in physics and chemistry, space exploration, and many more applications. Ion mobility spectrometry separates ions in the gas-phase drifting under an electric field according to their size to charge ratio. Ion mobility spectrometry disadvantages are false positives that delay transportation, compromise patient's health and other negative issues when IMS is used for detection. To prevent false positives, IMS measures the ion mobilities in 2 different conditions, in pure buffer gas or when shift reagents (SRs) are introduced in this gas, providing 2 different characteristic properties of the ion and increasing the chances of right identification. Mobility shifts with the introduction of SRs in the buffer gas are due to clustering of analyte ions with SRs. Effective SRs are polar volatile compounds with free electron pairs with a tendency to form clusters with the analyte ion. Formation of clusters is favored by formation of stable analyte ion-SR hydrogen bonds, high analytes' proton affinity, and low steric hindrance in the ion charge while stabilization of ion charge by resonance may disfavor it. Inductive effects and the number of adduction sites also affect cluster formation. The prediction of IMS separations of overlapping peaks is important because it simplifies a trial and error procedure. Doping experiments to simplify IMS spectra by changing the ion-analyte reactions forming the so-called alternative reactant ions are not considered in this review and techniques other than drift tube IMS are marginally covered.