Photocatalytic electrochemical sensor based on three-dimensional graphene nanocomposites for the ultrasensitive detection of CYFRA21-1 gene

The sensor applications for prostate and lung cancer biomarkers in terms of electrochemical analysis

Prostate and lung cancers are the most common types of cancer and affect a large part of the population around the world, causing deaths. Therefore, the rapid identification of cancer can profoundly impact reducing cancer-related death rates and protecting human lives. Significant resources have been dedicated to investigating new methods for early disease detection. Cancer biomarkers encompass various biochemical entities, including nucleic acids, proteins, sugars, small metabolites, cytogenetic and cytokinetic parameters, and whole tumor cells in bodily fluids. These tools can be utilized for various purposes, such as risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment efficacy, toxicity evaluation, and predicting a return. Due to these versatile and critical purposes, there are widespread studies on the development of new, sensitive, and selective approaches for the determination of cancer biomarkers. This review illustrates the significant lung and prostate cancer biomarkers and their determination utilizing electrochemical sensors, which have the advantage of improved sensitivity, low cost, and simple analysis. Additionally, approaches such as improving sensitivity with nanomaterials and ensuring selectivity with MIPs are used to increase the performance of the sensor. This review aims to overview the most recent electrochemical biosensor applications for determining vital biomarkers of prostate and lung cancers in terms of nanobiosensors and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based biosensors.

Conducting polymer composite-based biosensing materials for the diagnosis of lung cancer: A review

The development of a simple and fast cancer detection method is crucial since early diagnosis is a key factor in increasing survival rates for lung cancer patients. Among several diagnosis methods, the electrochemical sensor is the most promising one due to its outstanding performance, portability, real-time analysis, robustness, amenability, and cost-effectiveness. Conducting polymer (CP) composites have been frequently used to fabricate a robust sensor device, owing to their excellent physical and electrochemical properties as well as biocompatibility with nontoxic effects on the biological system. This review brings up a brief overview of the importance of electrochemical biosensors for the early detection of lung cancer, with a detailed discussion on the design and development of CP composite materials for biosensor applications. The review covers the electrochemical sensing of numerous lung cancer markers employing composite electrodes based on the conducting polyterthiophene, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), polyaniline, polypyrrole, molecularly imprinted polymers, and others. In addition, a hybrid of the electrochemical biosensors and other techniques was highlighted. The outlook was also briefly discussed for the development of CP composite-based electrochemical biosensors for POC diagnostic devices.

CoNi-RGO and NiCo2S4-ZIF/g-C3N4 signal amplified electrochemical immunosensors for sensitive detection of CYFRA 21-1

Herein, a signal amplified electrochemical immunosensor for the sensitive detection of cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in human serum was discussed. The CoNi-RGO was used as a substrate for the sensor with excellent specific surface area and strong electrical conductivity, which enables more efficient attachment of antibodies. The introduction of the bimetallic sulfide NiCo₂S₄ composite ZIF material provides strong catalytic performance for the immunosensor. It is worth noting that, in addition to these satisfactory advantages, these two materials also show amazing signal amplification capacity. When the immunosensor works, the increase in electrical impedance decreases the electron transfer rate, making the electrochemical signal change obvious. The signal enhancement of immunosensors was emphasized by the marker during construction, and the experimental results were satisfactory. The proposed signal enhanced immunosensor had a linear relationship in the range of 0.001-10 ng/mL for CYFRA 21-1, and the minimum detection limit was 0.33 pg/mL for △I = 95.22 + 23.27 lg c. This demonstrates that the electrochemical immunosensor we constructed is successful and has a great developing potential.

Application Value of Serum TK1 and PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and CEA plus Enhanced CT Scan in the Diagnosis of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer and Chemotherapy Monitoring

Objective

To assess the application value of serum thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) and PC cell-derived growth factor (PCDGF), cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) plus enhanced CT scan in the diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and chemotherapy monitoring.

Methods

Between April 2019 and April 2021, 30 patients with NSCLC assessed for eligibility treated in our institution were included in the experimental group, and 30 healthy individuals screened out from physical examinations were recruited in the control group. The chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine plus cisplatin, pemetrexed disodium plus cisplatin, and vinorelbine plus cisplatin. The application value of serum TK1, PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, CEA, and enhanced CT scan in the diagnosis and chemotherapy monitoring of NSCLC was analyzed.

Results

Before treatment, the eligible patients had significantly higher serum levels of TK1, PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and CEA than those of the healthy individuals included (P < 0.05). Clinical efficacy was categorized into good and poor, and the good efficacy included complete response and partial response, with the poor efficacy including stable disease and progressive disease. Patients with good clinical efficacy had lower levels of serum TK1, PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and CEA than those with poor efficacy (P < 0.05). Joint detection showed a larger area under the curve (AUC) (0.900; 95%CI, 0.812-0.988), a higher sensitivity, and a superior detection outcome to the stand-alone detection (P < 0.05). Diagnostic results were similar between joint detection and pathological examination (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of serum TK1, PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and CEA assay plus enhanced CT scan shows high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis and chemotherapy monitoring of nonsmall cell lung cancer and thus provides a diagnostic reference basis.