What parents say about disclosing the end of their pregnancy due to fetal abnormality

Encountering the health and social environment after a pregnancy loss: A grounded theory study from male perspective

AIM

To develop an empirical model that explores and explains the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with health and social environments.

METHODS

A constructivist grounded theory method was performed, whereby 23 couples were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Men that suffered pregnancy loss were analysed iteratively, with line-by-line and incident-to-incident coding, focused coding and axial coding, until data saturation and the emergence of theory.

RESULTS

The theory Behind bars that hide and mask them illustrates the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with the health and social environment. Social taboo and gender stereotypes could repress, marginalize, and hide men's feelings. This transposed into the healthcare setting, which focused on the physical aspects of the woman, and lacked an emotional approach, follow-up, and sensitivity. Men reported a lack of recognition or family and social support.

CONCLUSION

Many men report not feeling involved in the care process after pregnancy loss, in addition to the prioritisation of medicalised care, which can be explained by a medical paternalism approach. These results provide a basis to reflect and plan the inclusion of men for the provision of comprehensive and couple-centred care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Communication strategies and emotional management, self-reflection of health professionals, theoretical-practical content with a gender perspective in the training of nurses and midwives, involvement of the organisation and leadership, and further research is required.

Addressing Perinatal Mental Health Risk within a Fetal Care Center

Diagnosis of a fetal anomaly in pregnancy increases the risk for perinatal mental health difficulties, including anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress among expectant parents. Common emotional challenges include uncertainty about the diagnosis/prognosis, anticipated neonatal course, fears of fetal or neonatal demise, loss of a typical, uncomplicated pregnancy and postpartum course, and disruption of family roles due to medical care-related activities and restrictions. Psychologists in multidisciplinary fetal care centers are uniquely positioned to assess mental health risks and address the needs of expectant parents. Psychologists bring additional expertise in screening and assessment, clinical interventions to promote coping and symptom reduction while preparing for birth and a complicated neonatal course, consultation and effective communication, and programmatic development. This review paper provides an overview of the challenges and behavioral health risks for expectant parents carrying a fetus with a birth defect and the unique role psychologists play to support patients and families within fetal care settings.

Men's experiences and need for targeted support after termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly: A qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore men's experiences of termination of pregnancy for life-limiting foetal anomaly, including how healthcare providers, systems and policies can best support men and their families.

BACKGROUND

While there is a sizable body of research and recommendations relating to women's experiences of grief and support needs following a termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly, very few studies specifically examine men's experiences.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were completed with ten Australian men who had experienced termination of pregnancy for life-limiting foetal anomalies with a female partner between six months and 11 years ago. Interviews were completed over the telephone, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. COREQ guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis resulted in the identification of three over-arching themes, each with two sub-themes. First, participants described the decision to terminate their pregnancy as The most difficult choice, with two sub-themes detailing 'Challenges of decision-making' and 'Stigma surrounding TOPFA'. Second, participants described that they were Neither patient, nor visitor in the hospital setting, with sub-themes 'Where do men fit?' and 'Dual need to support and be supported'. Finally, Meet me where I am described men's need for specific supports, including the sub-themes 'Contact men directly' and 'Tailor support and services'.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicated that termination of pregnancy for life-limiting foetal anomaly (TOPFA) is an extremely difficult experience for men, characterised by challenges in decision-making and perceived stigma. Men felt overlooked by current services and indicated that they need specific support to assist with their grief. Expansion of existing infrastructure and future research should acknowledge the central role of fathers and support them in addressing their grief following TOPFA.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nursing/midwifery professionals are well situated to provide men with tailored information and to promote genuine inclusion, acknowledgement of their grief, and facilitate referrals to community supports.

Experiences of fathers having faced with termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality

The development of medical ultrasound techniques and progress in prenatal diagnosis allows foetus malformations to be discovered during pregnancy. These outcomes may force parents to be faced with the decision of termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality (TOP). According to the literature, some parents will develop somatic or psychological troubles during and after the TOP, differently depending on sex. Moreover, fathers feel sometimes isolated during TOP. It seems important to propose a specific support for fathers throughout this event. Aim of this qualitative study is to describe how fathers perceive the TOP, their feelings about caregivers and their strategies for coping. Our study was performed in the Maternity Department of the Nancy University Hospital, between April and December 2016 and concerns TOP beyond 22 weeks of amenorrhea. Semi-structured interview was offered to the father the day after the TOP. These semi-structured interviews were transcribed, and text thus obtained were subjected to inductive thematic analysis. Eight men agreed to participate in this study. Results show that fathers have gone through intense emotional strain throughout the TOP. They experienced a fear of losing their partner, feelings of anger, loneliness and exclusion. They used internalisation, minimisation and avoidance by distraction. In addition, they all insisted on their desire to be beside their partners throughout the TOP. As found in recent literature, the midwives and other caregivers have a role to play in supporting the couple: during the TOP and after the procedure, because consequences may appear after several months.

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies: Parents' preferences for psychosocial care

Objective

To investigate, from the perspective of women and partners, at what stage of a termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal anomalies psychosocial care (PSC) is most meaningful, what topics should be discussed, and who should provide PSC.

Method

A cross‐sectional retrospective cohort study was conducted with a consecutive series of 76 women and 36 partners, who completed a semi‐structured online questionnaire.

Results

Overall, women expressed a greater need for PSC than their partners. Parents expressed a preference for receiving support from a maternal‐fetal medicine specialist to help them understand the severity and consequences of the anomalies found and to counsel them in their decision regarding termination. Parents showed a preference for support from mental healthcare providers to help with their emotional responses. Forty‐one percent of the women visited a psychosocial professional outside of the hospital after the TOP, indicating a clear need for a well‐organised aftercare.

Conclusion

Different disciplines should work together in a complementary way during the diagnosis, decision making, TOP, and aftercare stages. Parents' need for PSC should be discussed at the beginning of the process. During aftercare, attention should be paid to grief counselling, acknowledgement of the lost baby's existence, and possible future pregnancies.

What's already known about this topic?

Pregnancy termination for fetal anomalies has multiple psychological consequences for parents.

Parents are mostly unaware of the need for psychosocial care during and after pregnancy termination.

What does this study add?

Knowledge about which stage parents consider to be most meaningful for psychosocial care, the topics that should be discussed, and who should provide psychosocial care.

Awareness that different disciplines should collaborate during and after the pregnancy termination.

Parental experiences after prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality

For many pregnant women, prenatal testing is a routine component of contemporary pregnancy care. Receiving a prenatal diagnosis is frequently associated with intense feelings of shock and grief; the extent of which may be unrelated to the pregnancy gestation or the condition diagnosed. During this time of crisis, parents are often faced with important choices about their pregnancy. Levels of understanding and experiences of professional support throughout this time likely impact decisions that are made and how they are subsequently perceived. Despite considerable advances in prenatal testing technologies over the last 20 years there is a paucity of research examining parental experiences in-depth. Future advances such as prenatal exome sequencing will further increase the scope of prenatal testing and numbers of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis. It is imperative that large-scale studies are performed to ensure that protocols are in place to adequately support couples at this time.

Informing the development of NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) quality standards through secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interviews on patients’ experiences

Background

We set out to explore if, and how, an archive of qualitative, narrative interviews covering over 60 health issues could be used to inform the development of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. We also sought to identify which aspects of health care are important to people facing different health conditions and to test a set of ‘core components’ in focus groups with people who tend to be less well represented in interview research studies.

Objectives

(1) To conduct qualitative secondary analysis (of collections of narrative interviews) to identify common, core components of patients’ experiences of the NHS. (2) To test these candidate components with (i) further purposive sampling of the interview collections and (ii) a series of focus groups with users. (3) To embed the project alongside the development of NICE clinical guidelines and quality standards. (4) To inform the development of measurement tools on patients’ experiences. (5) To develop and share resources and skills for secondary analysis of qualitative health research.

Methods and data sources

We used qualitative methods including qualitative secondary analysis, interviews with team members and focus groups. We also ran a workshop on secondary analysis practice and a dissemination seminar. The secondary analysis used narrative interviews from the archive held by the Health Experiences Research Group in Oxford. These interviews have been collected over a 12-year period, number over 3500 and are copyrighted to the University of Oxford for research publications and broadcasting. Other data were digital recordings of interviews and observations at meetings. We prepared reports intended to contribute to NICE clinical guidelines and quality standards development.

Results

We identified eight consistently important aspects of care: involving the patient in decisions; a friendly and caring attitude; an understanding of how life is affected; seeing the same health professional; guiding through difficult conversations; taking time to explain; pointing towards further support; and efficiently sharing health information across services. Expectations varied but we found few differences in what is valued, even when we tested the reach of these ideas with groups who rarely take part in mainstream health research. The asthma report for NICE highlighted several issues, but only the importance of proper inhaler training contributed to a quality statement. Several barriers were identified to using (unpublished) tailor-made analyses in NICE product development.

Conclusions

We compared the perspectives about what is most valued in health care between people with different health conditions. They were in agreement, even though their experiences of health-care relationships varied enormously. With regard to the NICE clinical guideline and quality standard development process, the usual source of evidence is published qualitative or quantitative research. Unpublished secondary analysis of qualitative data did not fit the usual criteria for evidence. We suggest that targeted secondary analysis of qualitative data has more potential when the qualitative literature is sparse, unclear or contradictory. Further work might include further testing of the identified core components in other patient groups and health conditions, and collaboration with NICE technical teams to establish whether or not it is possible to identify areas of patient experience research where targeted secondary analyses have potential to add to a qualitative literature synthesis.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.