1
|
Laugaland KA, Akerjordet K, Frøiland CT, Aase I. Co-creating digital educational resources to enhance quality in student nurses' clinical education in nursing homes: Report of a co-creative process. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:3899-3912. [PMID: 37461247 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
AIM To report a methodological, co-creative approach for developing an interactive digital educational resource to enhance the quality of student nurses' clinical education in nursing homes and to elucidate the lessons learned from this approach. DESIGN This study applied a co-design methodology that builds on participatory design principles. METHODS Co-creating the digital educational resource included multiple sequential and interactive phases inspired by the design thinking framework. Workshops were employed as the primary co-creative activity. RESULTS Seven separate homogenous or joint heterogeneous workshops were conducted with student nurses, nurse educators, registered nurse mentors and e-learning designers (n = 36) during the active stakeholder engagement phases to inform the educational content, design and functionality of the digital educational resource. These were informed by, and grounded in, learning theory and principles. CONCLUSION Co-creative approaches in nursing education are an essential avenue for further research. We still lack systematic knowledge about the impact and benefits of co-created initiatives, stakeholders' motivations, barriers, facilitators to participation and the role of context in supporting effective co-creative processes to increase the quality of nursing education. IMPACT This paper demonstrates how digital educational initiatives to enhance quality in clinical nursing education can be co-created with key stakeholders through a novel methodological approach inspired by design thinking. To date, the methodological development process of co-created educational interventions has received limited attention and compared with the content and theoretical underpinnings of such interventions, has rarely been addressed. Therefore, this paper facilitates knowledge exchange and documents vital aspects to consider when co-creating digital educational initiatives incorporating multistakeholder perspectives. This promotes a stronger academic-practice partnership to impact and enhance the quality of clinical nursing education in nursing homes. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS Student nurses, nurse educators, and registered nurse mentors worked alongside researchers and e-learning designers in the co-creative process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin A Laugaland
- SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kristin Akerjordet
- SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- School of Psychology, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Christina T Frøiland
- SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Ingunn Aase
- SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacobson LT, Wolfe M, Zackula R, Okut H, Hampton FE, Grainger DA, Griebel-Thompson AK, Ling Kong K, Befort C. Electronic Monitoring Of Mom's Schedule (eMOMS TM): Recruitment of pregnant populations with elevated BMI in a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102254. [PMID: 37292426 PMCID: PMC10244679 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Underrepresentation of pregnant populations in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle change interventions is concerning due to high attrition and providers' limited clinical time. The purpose of this evaluative study was to assess intervention uptake of pregnant individuals enrolled in a three-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial, electronic Monitoring Of Mom's Schedule (eMOMSTM), examining lifestyle changes and lactation support alone, and in combination. Measures included: (1) participation and completion rates, and characteristics of intervention completers versus other eligible participants; and (2) provider experiences with screening and enrolling pregnant participants. Pregnant people with a pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥ 25 and < 35 kg/m2 were enrolled into the eMOMSTM trial between September 2019 - December 2020. Of the 44 consented participants, 35 were randomized, at a participation rate of 35%, and 26 completed the intervention, resulting in a completion rate of 74%. Intervention completers were slightly older and entered the study earlier in pregnancy compared to non-completers. Completers were more likely to be first-time mothers, resided in urban areas, had higher educational attainment, and were slightly more racially and ethnically diverse. A majority of providers reported willingness to participate, believed the study aligned with their organization's mission, and were satisfied with using iPads for screening. Lessons learned to guide recruitment success include use of: (1) designated research staff in combination with physician support; and (2) user-friendly technology to help mitigate time burden on physicians and their staff. Future work should focus on successful strategies to recruit/retain pregnant populations in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisette T. Jacobson
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Michael Wolfe
- Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita, Inc., Ascension Via Christi Maternal Fetal Medicine Clinic, 1515 South Clifton Avenue, Suite 130, Wichita, KS 67218, USA
| | - Rosey Zackula
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Office of Research, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Hayrettin Okut
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Office of Research, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Faith E. Hampton
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Population Health, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - David A. Grainger
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 North Kansas, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
| | - Adrianne K. Griebel-Thompson
- Baby Health Behavior Lab, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Research Institute, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Kai Ling Kong
- Baby Health Behavior Lab, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Research Institute, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA
| | - Christie Befort
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Department of Population Health, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1003, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lander J, Heiberger A, Von Sommoggy J, Schulz AA, Dresch C, Altawil H, Schmitt G, Wirtz MA. Intentional and actional components of engaged participation in public health research studies: qualitative synthesis of a recruitment and retention process into the theory-informed INTACT-RS framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:17. [PMID: 36647023 PMCID: PMC9841138 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01838-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring motivated and successful study participation is a key challenge in the design and conduct of health research studies. Previously, recruitment barriers and facilitators have been identified mainly from experience, and rarely based on theoretical approaches. We developed a framework of intentional and actional components of engaged participation in public health research studies (INTACT-RS), informed by psychological behavioral models. We aimed a) to identify precise indicators for each framework component and b) to better understand which components and decision processes are essential for study participants. METHODS Within a multicenter research network, we applied various approaches to recruit parents of newborns, pediatricians, and midwives. All recruitment processes were documented from the perspective of both participants and researchers. We used different qualitative and quantitative data material, which we applied in a multistage process according to the basic principles of qualitative content analysis. RESULTS INTACT-RS encompasses pre-intentional, intentional and actional phases with a total of n = 15 components covering all aspects of an individual's involvement with a research study. During intention formation, an understanding of efforts and benefits, why participation is valuable beyond contributing to research, and how others perceive the study, were particularly important to (potential) participants. Subsequently (intentional phase), participants consider how and when participation is compatible with their own resources, ability and availability, and hence seek for close communication with, and flexibility and support from the research team. During and after (initial) participation (actional phase), participants' assessment of whether expectations and interests have been met impact crucial further steps, especially the willingness to continue and to recommend participation to others. A strong topic-wise and or supportive participation interest as well as active, continuous exchange with the researchers appeared to be central determinants of study completion and data validity. CONCLUSIONS A theoretical framework is now available to plan and conduct recruitment of different target groups, which accounts for essential motivational and volitional decision-making processes. Based on empirically specified constructs, possible barriers can be addressed even before the initial recruitment process. Therefore, recommendations for scientific practice have been formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Andrea Heiberger
- grid.461778.b0000 0000 9752 9146Research Methods in Health Sciences, Faculty for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julia Von Sommoggy
- grid.7727.50000 0001 2190 5763Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anja Alexandra Schulz
- grid.461778.b0000 0000 9752 9146Research Methods in Health Sciences, Faculty for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Dresch
- grid.461778.b0000 0000 9752 9146Research Methods in Health Sciences, Faculty for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hala Altawil
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Gwendolyn Schmitt
- grid.461778.b0000 0000 9752 9146Public Health & Health Education, Faculty for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Markus Antonius Wirtz
- grid.461778.b0000 0000 9752 9146Research Methods in Health Sciences, Faculty for Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hanrahan V, Lawrie L, Duncan E, Biesty L, Gillies K. Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care. Trials 2022; 23:870. [PMID: 36224619 PMCID: PMC9556136 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence on what strategies can improve recruitment to clinical trials in maternity care is lacking. As trial recruiters, maternity healthcare professionals (MHCPs) perform behaviours (e.g. talking about trials with potential participants, distributing trial information) they may not ordinarily do outside of the trial. Most trial recruitment interventions do not provide any theoretical basis for the potential effect (on behaviour) or describe if stakeholders were involved during development. The study aim was to use behavioural theory in a co-design process to develop an intervention for MHCPs tasked with approaching all eligible potential participants and inviting them to join a maternity trial and to assess the acceptability and feasibility of such an intervention. Methods This study applied a step-wise sequential mixed-methods approach. Key stages were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy to map the accounts of MHCPs, with regard to challenges to trial recruitment, to theoretically informed behaviour change strategies. Our recruitment intervention was co-designed during workshops with MHCPs and maternity service users. Acceptability and feasibility of our intervention was assessed using an online questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and involved a range of trial stakeholders. Results Two co-design workshops, with a total of nine participants (n = 7 MHCP, n = 2 maternity service users), discussed thirteen BCTs as potential solutions. Ten BCTs, broadly covering Consequences and Reframing, progressed to intervention development. Forty-five trial stakeholders (clinical midwives, research midwives/nurses, doctors, allied health professionals and trial team members) participated in the online TFA questionnaire. The intervention was perceived effective, coherent, and not burdensome to engage with. Core areas for future refinement included Anticipated opportunity and Self-efficacy. Conclusion We developed a behaviour change recruitment intervention which is based on the accounts of MHCP trial recruiters and developed in a co-design process. Overall, the intervention was deemed acceptable. Future evaluation of the intervention will establish its effectiveness in enabling MHCPs to invite all eligible people to participate in a maternity care trial, and determine whether this translates into an increase in maternity trial recruitment rates. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hanrahan V, Biesty L, Lawrie L, Duncan E, Gillies K. Theory-guided interviews identified behavioral barriers and enablers to healthcare professionals recruiting participants to maternity trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 145:81-91. [PMID: 35081447 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a behavioral investigation, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to identify barriers and enablers to maternity healthcare professionals (HCP) inviting all eligible women to participate in a maternity care trial. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We invited HCP recruiters from maternity care trials in high priority research areas including, diabetes, preeclampsia and breastfeeding, from across Ireland and the UK, to take part in a semi-structured interview. Data collection was informed by the TDF, followed by inductive thematic analysis and deductive mapping to the TDF. RESULTS Twenty-two recruiters including midwives, nurses, allied health professionals and doctors were interviewed online or by telephone phone. Thematic analysis generated four global themes; Availability and accessibility of resources, Navigating the recruitment pathway, Prioritising clinical responsibilities over research responsibilities and The influence of colleagues and peers. Themes were mapped to the TDF, identifying 13 domains relevant to the behaviour. CONCLUSION This paper identifies the factors enabling or inhibiting maternity HCP recruiters to invite all eligible women to participate in a maternity care trial. The findings provide guidance for researchers designing trials for this population and the essential first step in developing a recruiter-focused behaviour change intervention to support recruitment to trials in maternity care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne Hanrahan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Áras Moyola, Upper Newcastle, Galway, Ireland; Health Research Board - Trial Methodology Research Network, Áras Moyola, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Linda Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Áras Moyola, Upper Newcastle, Galway, Ireland
| | - Louisa Lawrie
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Eilidh Duncan
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Montgomery KE, Ward J, Raybin JL, Balian C, Gilger EA, Smith C. Building capacity through integration of advanced practice nurses in research. Nurs Outlook 2021; 69:1030-1038. [PMID: 34625275 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced practice nurses (APNs) are well-positioned to function in research settings, however barriers to their engagement persist. Capacity-building through multisite research opportunities is an important strategy to overcome these barriers. PURPOSE To describe the benefits and challenges of incorporating APNs in research and discuss opportunities for building capacity for nursing research. METHOD Grounded in the experience of a nurse-led multisite longitudinal observational descriptive symptom study, field notes representing the research continuum were reviewed and categorized into themes reflecting benefits and challenges. FINDINGS Uniform benefits of acquiring research knowledge and skills, participating in research activities, and engaging in professional development were experienced among APNs. Limited support for regulatory and research activities, inadequate financial infrastructure, and a perceived lack of value for APNs' professional growth were commonly encountered challenges. DISCUSSION Establishment of an infrastructure that elevates benefits and mitigates challenges is necessary to effectively incorporate APNs in a research environment, build capacity, and advance nursing science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica Ward
- Institute for Nursing and Interprofessional Research, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jennifer L Raybin
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Chelsea Balian
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elizabeth A Gilger
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Corey Smith
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silva TV, Bento SF, Katz L, Pacagnella RC. "Preterm birth risk, me?" Women risk perception about premature delivery - a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:633. [PMID: 34537000 PMCID: PMC8449432 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04068-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Risk perception is based on collective indicators, but it is influenced by the individual’s self-perception of his health-disease process. This study aims to investigate the risk perception of pregnant women who were identified as high-risk for premature birth and to seek strategies for better management of such cases. Methods This is a cross-sectional study where women who had completed their participation in P5 trial were contacted and invited to answer a structured questionnaire with open questions. Data were collected by telephone and analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis categories were defined, and all the answers were reviewed, categorized, grouped, and a descriptive summary was prepared. Results Two hundred eight Brazilian women have participated. Three categories were identified: (1) Risk perception mediated by health professionals; (2) Self-perception of risk through personal experiences and relationships; (3) Perception of treatment success. After receiving an explanation from a health professional about short cervix and premature birth, women understood the risk of premature delivery, recognizing the importance of early diagnosis to prevent premature birth. Unsuccessful previous experiences in prior pregnancies influenced women’s risk perception. Patients believed in the success of the treatment performed, placing their hopes on the treatment even without research guarantees about benefits. Conclusions Pregnant women’s risk perception regarding prematurity is based partly on personal and family experiences but mainly on information given by health professionals. The risk perception about preterm birth may contribute to healthy pregnancy, guiding necessary interventions and preventing adverse outcomes. Prevention studies on prematurity should thus focus on neonatal outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04068-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaís V Silva
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), R. Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária. Barão Geraldo, SP, Campinas, Brazil.,University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - Silvana F Bento
- Women's Hospital "Prof. Dr. José A Pinotti" - Center for Integral Attention to Women (CAISM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Leila Katz
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - Rodolfo C Pacagnella
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), R. Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária. Barão Geraldo, SP, Campinas, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith CF, Kristensen BM, Andersen RS, Hobbs FR, Ziebland S, Nicholson BD. GPs' use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk: a qualitative study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e356-e363. [PMID: 33753347 PMCID: PMC7997673 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21x714269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of gut feelings to guide clinical decision making in primary care has been frequently described but is not considered a legitimate reason for cancer referral. AIM To explore the role that gut feeling plays in clinical decision making in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative interview study with 19 GPs in Oxfordshire, UK. METHOD GPs who had referred patients to a cancer pathway based on a gut feeling as a referral criterion were invited to participate. Interviews were conducted between November 2019 and January 2020, and transcripts were analysed using the one sheet of paper method. RESULTS Gut feeling was seen as an essential part of decision making that facilitated appropriate and timely care. GPs distanced their gut feelings from descriptions that could be seen as unscientific, describing successful use as reliant on experience and clinical knowledge. This was especially true for patients who fell within a 'grey area' where clinical guidelines did not match the GP's assessment of cancer risk, either because the guidance inadequately represented or did not include the patient's presentation. GPs sought to legitimise their gut feelings by gathering objective clinical evidence, careful examination of referral procedures, and consultation with colleagues. CONCLUSION GPs described their gut feelings as important to decision making in primary care and a necessary addition to clinical guidance. The steps taken to legitimise their gut feelings matched that expected in good clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benedikte Møller Kristensen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rikke Sand Andersen
- Institute for Public Health - General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Fd Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sue Ziebland
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rose J, Lynn K, Akister J, Maxton F, Redsell SA. Community midwives' and health visitors' experiences of research recruitment: a qualitative exploration using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2021; 22:e5. [PMID: 33509327 PMCID: PMC8057511 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423621000050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful research is frequently hampered by poor study recruitment, especially in community settings and with participants who are women and their children. Health visitors (HVs) and community midwives (CMs) are well placed to invite young families, and pregnant and postnatal women to take part in such research, but little is known about how best to support these health professionals to do this effectively. AIM This study uses the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the factors that influence whether HVs and CMs invite eligible patients to take part in research opportunities. METHOD HVs (n = 39) and CMs (n = 22) working in four NHS Trusts and one community partnership in England completed an anonymous, online survey with open-ended questions about their experiences of asking eligible patients to take part in the research. Qualitative data were analysed using directed content analysis and inductive coding to identify specific barriers and enablers to patient recruitment within each of the 14 theoretical domains. FINDINGS Six key TDF domains accounted for 81% of all coded responses. These were (a) environmental context and resources; (b) beliefs about capabilities; (c) social/professional role and identity; (d) social influences; (e) goals; (f) knowledge. Key barriers to approaching patients to participate in the research were time and resource constraints, perceived role conflict, conflicting priorities, and particularly for HVs, negative social influences from patients and researchers. Enablers included feeling confident to approach patients, positive influence from peers, managers and researchers, beliefs in the relevance of this behaviour to health care and practice and good knowledge about the study procedures, its rationale and the research topic. The findings suggest that to improve research recruitment involving HVs and CMs, a package of interventions is needed to address the barriers and leverage the enablers to participant approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie Rose
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kieran Lynn
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jane Akister
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Maxton
- Research Department, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK
| | - Sarah A. Redsell
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weller CD, Richards C, Turnour L, Team V. Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study. Int Wound J 2020; 17:1624-1633. [PMID: 32658349 PMCID: PMC7948544 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Recruitment to wound care clinical trials is challenging and a better understanding of patient decisions to participate has the potential to influence recruitment success. We conducted 31 semi-structured telephone interviews of patients who participated in the Aspirin in Venous Leg Ulcer (ASPiVLU) randomised controlled trail (RCT) or ASPiVLU cohort study. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. We identified four key themes: (a) "I participated to help others"; (b) "I participated in research to thank those who cared for me"; (c) "I participated to receive better care"; and (d) "I participated to have a say on what works." These themes became basic elements for the Rationale for Research Participation Framework that we have developed to improve the participant recruitment process for clinical trials in wound care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Catelyn Richards
- Monash Nursing and MidwiferyMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Louise Turnour
- Monash Nursing and MidwiferyMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Victoria Team
- Monash Nursing and MidwiferyMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hanrahan V, Gillies K, Biesty L. Recruiters' perspectives of recruiting women during pregnancy and childbirth to clinical trials: A qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234783. [PMID: 32559236 PMCID: PMC7304625 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research on research is key to enhancing efficacy in trial methodology. Clinical trials involving women during pregnancy and childbirth are limited, with a paucity of data guiding evidence-based practice. Following a prioritisation exercise that highlighted the top-ten unanswered recruitment questions, this qualitative evidence synthesis was designed specifically to focus on the barriers and enablers for clinicians/healthcare professionals in helping conduct randomised trials within the context of recruitment during pregnancy and childbirth. METHODS The synthesis was undertaken using Thomas and Harden's three stage thematic synthesis method and reported following the ENTREQ guidelines. Using a pre-determined SPIDER strategy, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases; Pubmed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and grey searches for records until January 2019. We included all reports of qualitative data on recruiter's experiences, perceptions, views of recruiting women during pregnancy and childbirth to clinical trials. Altogether 13,401 records were screened, resulting in 31 full-text reviews, of which five were eligible for inclusion. Quality was appraised using CASP. Data were extracted onto a specifically defined form. We used thematic synthesis to identify descriptive and analytical themes, and to interpret and generate theory. Confidence was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. The review protocol is publicly available (OSF https://osf.io/g4dt9/). RESULTS Five papers (representing four individual studies) from two different countries were included. All studies focused on the experiences of trial recruiters in the maternity setting. We identified four analytical themes; Recruitment through a clinician's lens, Recruiters judgement on acceptability, From protocol to recruiters lived experience, Framing recruitment in context. These were linked by an overarching theme combining beliefs and power. CONCLUSION The overarching theme combining beliefs and power links the experiences and perceptions of recruiters. This synthesis shows a gap between the trial design study protocol and the recruiter's lived experience. Strategies such as collaborative trial design, mitigating gatekeeping behaviours, and training may support recruiters in their endeavour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne Hanrahan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|