Skin-to-skin contact and what women want in the first hours after a caesarean section

'connEcted caesarean section': creating a virtual link between MOthers and their infanTs to ImprOve maternal childbirth experieNce - study protocol for a PILOT trial (e-motion-pilot)

INTRODUCTION

One-third of mothers rate their childbirth as traumatic. The prevalence of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) is 4.7%. Skin-to-skin contact is a protective factor against CB-PTSD. However, during a caesarean section (CS), skin-to-skin contact is not always feasible and mothers and infants are often separated. In those cases, there is no validated and available solution to substitute this unique protective factor. Based on the results of studies using virtual reality and head-mounted displays (HMDs) and studies on childbirth experience, we hypothesise that enabling the mother to have a visual and auditory contact with her baby could improve her childbirth experience while she and her baby are separated. To facilitate this connection, we will use a two-dimensional 360° camera filming the baby linked securely to an HMD that the mother can wear during the end of the surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study protocol describes a monocentric open-label controlled pilot trial with minimal risk testing the effects of a visual and auditory contact via an HMD worn by the mother airing a live video of her newborn compared with treatment-as-usual in 70 women after CS. The first 35 consecutive participants will be the control group and will receive the standard care. The next 35 consecutive participants will have the intervention. The primary outcome will be differences in maternal childbirth experience (Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2) at 1-week postpartum between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes will be CB-PTSD symptoms, birth satisfaction, mother-infant bonding, perceived pain and stress during childbirth, maternal anxiety and depression symptoms, anaesthesiological data and acceptability of the procedure.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton de Vaud (study number 2022-00215). Dissemination of results will occur via national and international conferences, peer-reviewed journals, public conferences and social media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05319665.

The clinical experience of early skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in mothers of preterm infants: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In most areas of China, mothers typically do not participate in early care of preterm infants in NICU. This study aims to examine the early experience of mothers of preterm infants participating in skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in China.

METHODS

This qualitative research study used one-on-one, face-to-face, semi-structured in-depth interviews. Eighteen mothers who participated in early skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking were interviewed in the NICU of a tertiary children's hospital in Shanghai between July and December 2020. Their experiences were analyzed using the inductive topic analysis method.

RESULTS

Five themes about skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking were identified, including alleviation of maternal anxiety and fear during mother infant separation, reshaping the maternal role, promotion of active breast pumping, enhances the mother's willingness to actively breast feed and building the maternal confidence in baby care.

CONCLUSION

Skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in the NICU can not only enhance the identity and responsibility of the mother's role, but also provide non-nutritive sucking experience for promoting the establishment of oral feeding in preterm infants.

Is Early Initiation of Maternal Lactation a Significant Determinant for Continuing Exclusive Breastfeeding up to 6 Months?

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) within the first hour after birth. However, certain perinatal factors, namely caesarean section, may prevent this goal from being achieved. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between EIBF (maternal lactation in the first hours and degree of latching before hospital discharge) and the maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding (MBF) up to the recommended 6 months of age (as advocated by the WHO).

METHODS

This observational, retrospective cohort study included a random sample of all births between 2018 and 2019, characterising the moment of breastfeeding initiation after birth and the infant's level of breast latch (measured by LATCH assessment tool) prior to hospital discharge. Data were collected from electronic medical records and from follow-up health checks of infants up to 6 months postpartum.

RESULTS

We included 342 women and their newborns. EIBF occurred most often after vaginal (p < 0.001) and spontaneous births with spontaneous amniorrhexis (p = 0.002). LATCH score <9 points was associated with a 1.4-fold relative risk of abandoning MBF (95%CI: 1.2-1.7) compared with a score of 9-10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we were unable to find a significant association between EIBF in the first 2 h after birth and MBF at 6 months postpartum, low LATCH scores prior to discharge were associated with low MBF, indicating the importance of reinforcing the education and preparation efforts of mothers in the first days after delivery, prior to the establishment of an infant feeding routine upon returning home.

Neonatal resuscitation after birth: Swedish midwives' experiences of and perceptions about separation of mothers and their newborn babies

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate midwives' experiences of and perceptions about mother-baby separation during resuscitation of the baby following birth.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using an author-designed questionnaire. Fifty-four midwives from two Swedish birth units with different working methods regarding neonatal resuscitation - at the mother's bedside in the birth room or in a designated resuscitation room outside the birth room - completed the questionnaire. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Most midwives had experience of removing a newborn baby in need of critical care from the birth room, thus separating the mother and baby. The midwives identified the difficulties and challenges involved in carrying out emergency care in the birth room after birth and had divergent opinions about what they considered possible in these birth situations. They agreed on the benefits, for both mother and baby, in performing emergency care in the birth room and avoiding a separation altogether, if possible.

CONCLUSIONS

There are good opportunities to reduce separation of mother and baby after birth; training, knowledge, education and the right environmental conditions are important factors in successfully implementing new ways of working. It is possible to work towards reducing separation and this work should continue and strive to eliminate separation as far as possible.

Effects of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact on postpartum depression: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of the skin-to-skin contact (SSC) method on postpartum depression.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed.

FINDINGS

This review was completed with three studies meeting the research criteria. Two studies were randomized controlled studies and one study had a quasi-experimental design.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

SSC is such a low-cost intervention that it would be accessible, simple, and feasible for most mothers in the first postpartum weeks. By reducing mothers' depressive symptoms and physiological stress, SSC facilitates mothers' wellbeing and ultimately affects infants' development by enhancing the mother/infant relationship.

Women's experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant immediately after birth is recommended regardless of delivery method; however, it is less common after cesarean delivery. We aimed to describe and compare women's experiences of cesarean birth with and without skin-to-skin contact at an urban tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

In this hermeneutic phenomenologic study, we used semistructured telephone interviews from 2015 to 2018 to interview a convenience sample of women who delivered at term by scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth at an urban tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Women were invited to participate if they had had a previous planned or unplanned cesarean birth and a scheduled skin-to-skin cesarean birth between 2013 and 2017. Participants were excluded if they had antenatally diagnosed conditions, they delivered before 37 weeks, they had general anesthesia, their condition was unstable at the time of surgery, a skin-to-skin cesarean birth was not possible or they declined skin-to-skin cesarean birth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten women were interviewed 1-19 months postpartum. Four central themes emerged: support for skin-to-skin cesarean birth (women feeling supported by their families and health care providers); control (participants experiencing greater control during their skin-to-skin cesarean birth); connection with the infant, which enabled women to be active participants in their delivery, enhanced bonding and intimacy, facilitated breastfeeding and bolstered confidence during early parenthood; and logistic considerations, with participants recognizing that skin-to-skin cesarean birth required additional resources.

INTERPRETATION

These findings refine what is known about skin-to-skin cesarean birth and provide a critical perspective, that of mothers. They support the transformation of traditional operating room dynamics to a more patient-centred environment.

What are women's experiences of immediate skin-to-skin contact at caesarean section birth? An integrative literature review

BACKGROUND

Skin-to-skin is a well-established practice at vaginal births promoting the health of women and babies. Facilitation of skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth is growing despite environmental and historical challenges. This is led by the expectancy of women and of health professionals increasingly understanding its importance.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise original research that explores the experience of women having immediate and uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact at caesarean section when woman and baby are well.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

DATA SOURCES

The databases of SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL plus, Wiley Online, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and MIDIRS were used to identify studies from 2010-2020. Hand searching of library journals, reference and citation lists were also used.

METHODS

The framework of Whittemore and Knafl (2005) was used to guide the literature search, thematic analysis, and synthesis of original research. Initial screening against inclusion criteria was utilised for English-published papers of full-term, well, woman and baby dyads who experienced skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth. Papers were not limited by methodology. The validated Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for critical quality appraisal (Bartlett et al., 2018).

FINDINGS

In total, 750 results were returned in the initial search and a final 13 papers were included in this review including quantitative (6), qualitative (5) and mixed method (2) designs. Immediate and uninterrupted skin-to-skin at caesarean section birth, when mother and baby are well, is safe, appropriate and desired by women, improving birth experience and satisfaction. Three main themes were identified with sub-themes - Positive birth experience (satisfaction; breastfeeding goals); Sense of control (empowered; birth, not a procedure); Natural (wanting to hold their baby; becoming a mother).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review show that skin-to-skin improves the experience for women, and particularly empowers women having a caesarean section giving them a sense of a more natural birth. Women see skin-to-skin as an opportunity to maintain control and not be separated from their baby. Many studies have focused on the benefits of skin-to-skin but less so on the wants and choices of women. Women want to see, hold and feed their babies but are unable to achieve this of their own volition during a surgical birth. Understanding how women value this close physical contact can seek to inform further research on the impact of separation. This can inform policy and practice development in maternity care services to ensure best outcomes for both women and infants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The practice of skin-to-skin and keeping mother and baby together is valued by women and justified by research as best-practice for health and well-being. The findings of this paper highlight the importance of maternity settings facilitating both skin-to-skin and non-separation for all women and their newborns, even more so at caesarean section births.

Mothers' perceptions and experiences of skin-to-skin contact after vaginal birth in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

PROBLEM

The World Health Organization recommends immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth, however, worldwide, separation of mothers and infant is common.

BACKGROUND

In Saudi Arabia, there is a lack of research exploring mothers' experiences of skin-to-skin contact after birth.

AIM

To estimate the rate of skin-to-skin contact and describe mothers' perceptions and experiences of immediate skin-to-skin contact after vaginal birth in two largest hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study conducted in 2017. A total of 254 mothers completed the survey on the postnatal ward (92 % response rate). The survey consisted of 36 closed and open-ended items. Data were described using summary statistics and free text comments were analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of direct skin-to-skin contact was 15%. A further 54% of mothers had the baby placed on their chest/abdomen but with a sheet/gown between them. Mothers reported favourable perceptions towards skin-to-skin contact and reported the practice as acceptable (67%). Most mothers did not express concerns about feeling exposed (85%) or that skin-to-skin contact was inconsistent with norms of modesty or culture (87%). The free text comments indicated that most mothers felt positive about their experience of skin-to-skin contact, while some mothers felt overwhelmed and unprepared.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Skin-to-skin contact was not routinely implemented after birth and the rate was low. Mothers held positive perceptions and wanted to practice skin-to-skin contact. Policy makers and clinicians should acknowledge mothers' needs and feelings by facilitating skin-to-skin contact to achieve optimal outcomes for mothers and infants.

Intraoperative Mother and Baby Skin-to-Skin Contact during Cesarean Birth: Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Experts recommend immediate skin-to-skin (SSC) contact for all alert and stable mothers and newborns after birth. Clinicians are working to incorporate immediate (intraoperative) SSC during cesarean birth. The purpose of this systematic review is to describe the state of the science of intraoperative SSC for mother and baby and increase clinician's awareness of its potential benefits and risks.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic approach was followed throughout the review process. CINAHL, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched using strategies constructed by an academic health sciences librarian. Articles included in the review focused on SSC initiated during cesarean birth.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were selected for the mixed-method systematic review. Six prospective studies, four retrospective chart reviews, and three qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Maternal stress levels were reduced, whereas comfort, oxytocin, and antioxidant levels increased with intraoperative SSC. Physiologic measures of successful newborn transition showed little difference between newborns held in intraoperative SSC and those who were not. Synthesis of qualitative experiences revealed mothers' intense desire to hold and know their baby immediately after birth.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Intraoperative SSC is a safe, beneficial, and highly desirable practice for mothers and newborns experiencing cesarean birth. Although barriers exist to its implementation, nurses can facilitate and support this practice. Evidence-based, family-centered intraoperative SSC should be offered to all stable mothers and babies according to recommendations and in a manner that promotes safe outcomes, including following current nurse staffing guidelines.

Who benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has shown that skin-to-skin contact in the delivery room is associated with an increase satisfaction with childbirth. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether this association differs as a function of mode of birth, such that the positive effect of skin-to-skin contact would be especially pronounced for women who had operative births.

DESIGN

Survey design using self-administered questionnaires during pregnancy (Time 1) and at two months postpartum (Time 2).

SETTING

At Time 1, women were recruited at community and hospital medical centres in two large metropolitan areas in the centre of Israel and through home midwives and internet forums. At Time 2, women completed a second questionnaire in which they reported whether they had skin-to-skin contact with their infant immediately after birth and their birth satisfaction.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women, gestation week ≥24, with singleton pregnancy, who took part in both T1 and T2 (N = 1371, 75% of the 1833 women recruited at T1).

MEASUREMENTS

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine whether the association between skin-to-skin contact after birth and birth satisfaction two months post-partum, differs as a function of mode of birth. Maternal or infant complications during birth, parity, and whether the pregnancy was planned, served as covariates. Birth satisfaction was measured using the Childbirth Satisfaction Scale. All measures were self-reported.

FINDINGS

The frequency of skin-to-skin was high (83%) for women who had vaginal birth, but lower for women who had an instrumental birth (66%) or a caesarean section (31%). At two months postpartum, women who had operative births reported less satisfaction with their birth than women who gave birth via vaginal birth. A significant interaction between skin-to-skin and mode of birth showed that although skin-to-skin was associated with higher birth satisfaction among women across all three modes of birth, i.e., vaginal (Cohen's d = .41), instrumental (Cohen's d = .64) and caesarean (Cohen's d = .87), the effect for the difference in birth satisfaction between women with and without skin-to-skin was especially large for operative births, particularly for caesarean sections.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Operative birth is related to lower satisfaction with childbirth and lower rates of skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth. Yet, the association between skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction is especially strong for women who had operative births and specifically a caesarean section, suggesting that the possible contribution of skin-to-skin to birth satisfaction should be emphasised particularly after operative births.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is recommended that maternity care providers, managers, policy makers and medical teams facilitate skin-to-skin contact between the woman and her infant immediately, or as soon as possible, after childbirth, in both operative and non-operative births.

What matters to women in the postnatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

INTRODUCTION

The postnatal period is an underserved aspect of maternity care. Guidelines for postnatal care are not usually informed by what matters to the women who use it. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to identify what matters to women in the postnatal period, to inform the scope of a new World Health Organization (WHO) postnatal guideline.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, POPLINE, Global Index Medicus, EMBASE, LILACS, AJOL, and reference lists of eligible studies published January 2000-July 2019, reporting qualitative data on women's beliefs, expectations, and values relating to the postnatal period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Author findings were extracted, coded and synthesised using techniques derived from thematic synthesis. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.

RESULTS

We included 36 studies from 15 countries, representing the views of more than 800 women. Confidence in most results was moderate to high. What mattered to women was a positive postnatal experience where they were able to adapt to their new self-identity and develop a sense of confidence and competence as a mother; adjust to changes in their intimate and family relationships, including their relationship to their baby; navigate ordinary physical and emotional challenges; and experience the dynamic achievement of personal growth as they adjust to the 'new normal' of motherhood and parenting in their own cultural context.

CONCLUSION

This review provides evidence that what matters to women in the postnatal period is achieving positive motherhood (including maternal self-esteem, competence, and autonomy), as well as fulfilling adaptation to changed intimate and family relationships, and (re)gaining health and wellbeing for both their baby, and themselves. Where this process is optimal, it also results in joy, self-confidence, and an enhanced capacity to thrive in the new integrated identity of 'woman and mother'.