Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a physiological approach during labour and birth: A systematic review and thematic synthesis

The future of midwifery care and education in Belgium: A discussion paper

BACKGROUND

Advanced education of midwives acting during the first 1000 days in life is key in optimum care provision for intergenerational health and wellbeing.

AIM

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the current context of midwifery care and (inter)national trends in midwifery education. Gaps for optimizing midwifery education in Belgium are defined.

RESULTS

Societal, medical, and technological changes including medicalization of birth impact the midwife's profession and competency requirements. The World Health Organization demands adapted midwifery competency frameworks to meet these changes and achieve universal health coverage by 2030. While the European Union's directives address the recognition of professional qualifications of midwives, basic midwifery programs in Europe range from vocational to master's programs. In Belgium, basic midwifery programs are direct-entry bachelor programs; however, the program length varies according to the region. A horizon scanning by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center concluded that an extension and advancement of the current midwifery program are urgently needed to enable midwives to fulfil an autonomous role in accordance with national laws and international directives.

DISCUSSION

Basic midwifery education anno 2023 does not fit (1) the changes in women's health towards 2030; (2) the future demands regarding midwifery competence, and (3) the current and future demands for autonomy according to the legal frameworks.

CONCLUSION

An extension and advancement of the basic midwifery programs are needed to sufficiently arm midwives to meet changes they are confronted with. Therefore, a debate involving all stakeholders concerned with the future of midwifery care and education is recommended.

How does place impact intrapartum practice for midwives and obstetricians?

BACKGROUND

Rising rates of labour and birth interventions are causing concern, having the potential to cause harm if used inappropriately. International evidence demonstrates that place itself influences birth outcomes, but evidence is limited as to how. In New Zealand there are differences in the rates of spontaneous vaginal births by place, along with differences when benchmarking uncomplicated primiparae birthing in hospital maternity facilities throughout the country.

AIM

To develop understanding of how place influenced midwives' and obstetricians' practice in relation to supporting physiological birth.

METHOD

For this Hermeneutic Phenomenological study participants were purposively selected and consisted of nine midwives (employed and self-employed) and three obstetricians, all practising in midwifery led units or hospital maternity facilities. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews. The method of analysis involved writing and rewriting to surface interpretive insights, drawing on philosophical notions from Heidegger and Gadamer.

FINDINGS

The findings revealed that place influences what practitioners are attuned to, what is easier for them to achieve, and their ability to provide woman-centred care. Competing tensions and pressures within place can blur the perceived relationship between normality and risk, influencing what is considered to be safe.

SUMMARY

Place is not neutral; it influences how midwives and obstetricians practise and shapes how they support physiological labour and birth. The findings of this research contribute to a deeper understanding of the barriers and enablers to supporting physiological birth within place.

Discovering the invisible: Transformative learning experiences of midwifery students to support physiological birth during continuity of care placements in Québec's freestanding birth centres

BACKGROUND

Despite international consensus advocating a physiological approach to childbirth, there are inconsistent opinions on how to acquire the competencies needed to successfully carry out this approach. While continuity of care experiences (CoCE) within placements is a valued educational strategy, there are limited studies that focus on the learning experiences to support physiological birth.

AIM

To describe and understand the learning experiences related to physiological birth, as well as the transformations required to become a midwife who supports physiological birth, during the CoCE placement process in a birth centre.

METHODS

An interpretive description study design was adopted. Data were collected through audio diaries (n=126) with midwifery students and preceptors (n=14) across four level of placements in birth centres, in Québec, Canada, and discussion groups with students who kept the audio diaries.

RESULTS

Three main themes were identified: 1) appropriating culture: relational autonomy; 2) developing competencies: acknowledging attitude, enabling behaviours and narrative skills; 3) constructing identity: coherence and resistance.

DISCUSSION

The findings demonstrated the importance of CoCE, along with the continuity of preceptorship and a low-tech environment as optimal educational strategies for the acquisition of a culture and competencies that promote physiological childbirth. Resistance is part of identity transformation and represents an opportunity for critical questioning and safe feedback.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the understanding of the nature of the competencies developed and the transformations experienced to support physiological childbirth. It recognises the primacy of CoCE within extended placements, embedded in a workplace culture and environment that support relational autonomy.

Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women's experience: a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare experiences of the second stage of labour in women randomised to assistance by one or by two midwives to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT).

DESIGN

Analysis of a secondary outcome within the Swedish Oneplus multicentre randomised trial.

SETTING

Five obstetric units in Sweden between December 2018 and March 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria in the Oneplus trial were women opting for their first vaginal birth from gestational week 37+0 with a singleton pregnancy and a live fetus in the vertex presentation. Further inclusion criteria were language proficiency in Swedish, English, Arabic or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, intrauterine fetal demise and planned caesarean section. Of the 3059 women who had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 2831 women had consented to participate in the follow-up questionnaire.

INTERVENTIONS

Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to assistance by two midwives (intervention group) or one midwife (standard care) when reaching the second stage of labour.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were analysed by intention to treat. Comparisons between intervention and standard care regarding experiences of the second stage of labour were evaluated with items rated on Likert scales. The Student's t-test was used to calculate mean differences with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

In total 2221 (78.5%) women responded to the questionnaire. There were no statistically significant differences regarding women's experiences of being in control, feelings of vulnerability or pain. Women randomised to be assisted by two midwives agreed to a lesser extent that they could handle the situation during the second stage (mean 3.18 vs 3.26, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.15). Conducted subgroup analyses revealed that this result originated from one of the study sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention's lack of impact on the experience of the second stage is of importance considering the reduction in SPT when being assisted by two midwives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03770962.

What is 'physiological birth'? A scoping review of the perspectives of women and care providers

PROBLEM

Physiological birth was defined by the World Health Organization in 1997, however, clinical practices in childbirth have changed considerably since this time.

BACKGROUND

Ambiguous terms in healthcare such as 'physiological birth' may cause confusion amongst care providers and consumers.

AIM

To identify what is known about physiological birth, and how perceptions of physiological birth manifest in current literature.

METHODS

This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Four databases were searched using keywords relating to physiological birth. Relevant studies were identified using agreed criteria, and data were extracted and synthesised.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Three connected factors were identified: (1) Physiological birth in a risk-averse system, (2) Dominant voices in birth, and (3) Lack of exposure to physiological birth. No unified universal definition of physiological birth was identified in the literature.

DISCUSSION

'Physiological birth' as a term lacks consistency. A risk-averse healthcare system could be a barrier to physiological birth. Dominant voices in the birthing space can dictate the way birth occurs. Lack of exposure to physiological birth may diminish the acquisition and maintenance of important skills and knowledge among care providers. Recognising the factors important to women could lead to a positive birth experience.

CONCLUSION

Excluding a woman's subjective experience from health professionals' understanding of physiological birth increases the likelihood of risk management being the paramount objective in clinical decision-making. We propose it is timely to align clinical understanding of physiological birth with midwifery's woman-centred professional philosophy.

Experiences of health providers regarding implementation of the physiologic birth program in Iran: A qualitative content analysis

INTRODUCTION

The rate of cesarean section is on the rise in both developed and developing countries, and Iran is no exception. According to the WHO, physiologic labor is one of the main strategies for reducing cesarean section and improving the health of mothers and newborns. The aim of this qualitative study was to explain the experiences of health providers regarding implementation of the physiologic birth program in Iran.

METHODS

This study is a part of a mixed-methods study, in which 22 health providers were interviewed from January 2022 to June 2022. Data analysis was performed using Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis approach and using MAXQDA10 software.

RESULTS

Two main categories and nine subcategories emerged from the results of this study. The main categories included "the obstacles to the implementation of the physiologic birth program" and "strategies for improving implementation of the program". The subcategories of the first category included: lack of continuous midwifery care in the healthcare system, lack of free accompanying midwives, lack of integrated healthcare and hospitals in service provision, low quality of childbirth preparation and implementation of physiologic birth classes, and lack of requirements for the implementation of physiologic birth in the maternity ward. The second category included the following subcategories: Supervising the implementation of childbirth preparation classes and physiologic childbirth, support of midwives by insurance companies, holding training courses on physiologic birth, and evaluation of program implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The experiences of the health providers with the physiologic birth program revealed that policymakers should provide the ground for the implementation of this type of labor by removing the obstacles and providing the particular operational strategies needed in Iran. Important measures that can contribute to the implementation of the physiologic labor program in Iran include the following: Setting the stage for physiologic birth in the healthcare system, creating low- and high-risk wards in maternity hospitals, providing professional autonomy for midwifery, training childbirth providers on physiologic birth, monitoring the quality of program implementation, and providing insurance support for midwifery services.

Implementing midwifery units in a European country: Situational analysis of an Italian case study

INTRODUCTION

Strong evidence recommends midwifery-led care for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. International research is now focusing on how to implement midwifery models of care in countries where they are not well established. In Europe, many countries like Italy are promoting midwifery-led care in national guidelines but often struggle to apply this change in practice.

METHODS

This study collected data on professional, organisational and service users' levels to conduct a situational analysis of an Italian service which is approaching the implementation of a midwifery unit. Participatory Action Research was used together with the support of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to conduct data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants amongst professionals (midwives, obstetricians and neonatologists) and at organisational level (midwifery leaders and medical directors) were recruited; secondary data on service users' views was analysed via regional online surveys. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation were identified to assess the readiness of the local context.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to include professionals, managers and service users in a European context such as Italy. Facilitators to the implementation of the alongside midwifery unit were found in national guidelines, allocated funding, collaborative engagement and medical support. Hierarchical structures, a prevalent medical model and lack of trust and awareness of the evidence of safety of midwifery-led models were main barriers.

Negotiating Awareness: Dutch Midwives' Experiences of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Counseling

BACKGROUND

Discussion of the topic of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) has become a standard part of Dutch maternity care practice. This means that pregnant women who are contemplating NIPS can receive counseling from their midwife or obstetrician. The aim of this study is to understand the communicative practices and decision-making principles regarding first-tier use of NIPS, as experienced by Dutch midwives.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with Dutch midwives (n = 10) exploring their conversations about NIPS counseling and decision making.

RESULTS

Midwives value the autonomy of women in decisions on NIPS. They consider it a midwifery task to assess women's awareness of the risks and implications of using or not using this mode of screening. The optimal level of awareness may differ between women and midwives, creating novel challenges for informed decision making in midwifery communication.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Negotiating awareness about NIPS in individual women is a relatively new and complex midwifery task in need of counseling time and skill. NIPS practices call for a reflection on midwifery values in the context of integrated maternity care.