A simple and cost-effective method for the quantification of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in potable water

Analysis of physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of drinking water in Mafikeng, South Africa

Mafikeng, the capital of the North West Province, receives water from two sources, namely the Molopo eye and the Modimola dam. Once treated, the potable water is mixed and supplied to the city via distribution systems. This study was designed to assess the quality of drinking water in Mafikeng and also to determine whether the water from the two sources has an impact on the mixed water quality. Physico-chemical parameters and bacteriological quality (faecal coliforms (FCs), total coliforms (TCs), heterotrophic bacteria and Peudomonas spp.) was monitored at three drinking water sites weekly for 4 months. The results revealed that the physico-chemical quality of the water was generally acceptable. The pH ranged from 5.7 ± 0.18 to 8.6 ± 0.14, the temperature ranged from 18.3 ± 0.69 to 25.1 ± 0.69 °C and the total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 159.9 ± 22.44 to 364.4 ± 12.44 mg/l. These values are within the target water quality range for drinking water as prescribed by WHO, Department of Water Affairs and SANS 241. What is of concern was the microbial quality of the water. FCs, TCs, heterotrophic bacteria and Pseudomonas spp. were present in some of the treated water samples. The most significant finding of this study is that all drinking water samples were positive for Pseudomonas spp. (>100/100 ml).

Estimation of the environmental risk posed by landfills using chemical, microbiological and ecotoxicological testing of leachates

The leachates from 22 municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill sites in Southern Poland were characterized by evaluation of chemical, microbiological and ecotoxicological parameters. Chemical analyses were mainly focused on the identification of the priority hazardous substances according to Directive on Priority Substances, 2008/105/EC (a daughter directive of the WFD) in leachates. As showed, only five substances (Cd, Hg, hexachlorobutadiene, pentachlorobenzene and PAHs) were detected in the leachates. The compounds tested were absent or present at very low concentrations. Among them, only PAHs were found in all samples in the range from 0.057 to 77.2 μg L⁻¹. The leachates were contaminated with bacteria, including aerobic, psychrophilic and mesophilic bacteria, coliform and fecal coliforms, and spore-forming-bacteria, including Clostridium perfringens, and with filamentous fungi. From the analysis of specific microorganism groups (indicators of environmental pollution by pathogenic or opportunistic pathogenic organisms) it can be concluded that the landfill leachates showed sanitary and epidemiological hazard. In the ecotoxicological study, a battery of tests comprised of 5 bioassays, i.e. Microtox(®), Spirotox, Rotoxkit F™, Thamnotoxkit F™ and Daphtoxkit F™ magna was applied. The leachate samples were classified as toxic in 13.6%, highly toxic in 54.6% and very highly toxic in 31.8%. The Spirotox test was the most sensitive bioassay used. The percentage of class weight score was very high - above 60%; these samples could definitely be considered seriously hazardous and acutely toxic to the fauna and microflora. No correlations were found between the toxicity values and chemical parameters. The toxicity of leachate samples cannot be explained by low levels of the priority pollutants. It seems that other kinds of xenobiotics present in the samples at subacute levels gave the high aggregate toxic effect. The chemical, ecotoxicological and microbiological parameters of the landfill leachates should be analyzed together to assess the environmental risk posed by landfill emissions.

Evaluation of chromogenic technologies for use in Australian potable water

AIMS

To compare the use of MI agar, Membrane Lactose Glucoronide Agar (MLGA), CM1046 agar and Colilert-18 (Defined Substrate Technology, IDEXX Laboratories Pty. Ltd., Sydney) on Australian potable water.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both potable (n = 369) and nonpotable waters (n = 35) were analysed by membrane filtration using chromogenic agars as well as Colilert-18 over a period of 12 months. Recoveries of stressed organisms on these chromogenic media were also investigated. Agar-based chromogenic technologies compared favourably to Colilert-18 for chlorinated waters, but there are possible limitations when using these agars for chloraminated waters. Additionally, the breakthrough of problematic organisms, especially oxidase positive organisms, may lead to misrepresentation or over-estimation of E. coli and total coliforms, particularly on MLGA and CM1046. The recovery of stressed organisms was favoured in the Colilert-18 system when compared to chromogenic agars.

CONCLUSIONS

MI agar performed better than the other chromogenic agars with respect to recovery and colour identification and discrimination of organisms, and compared favourably with Colilert-18. The use of chromogenic agars in chloraminated waters should be done cautiously.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study provides comparison data for laboratories looking to adopt chromogenic technologies, and is especially important for Australian laboratories wanting to uptake the use of MI agar (as used in USEPA method 1604) for routine use and for gaining accreditation. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported evaluation of these agars in chloraminated waters and is especially timely as the use of this disinfection agent is increasing.