Detergent-free parasite transformation and replication assay for drug screening against intracellular Leishmania amastigotes

The latest progress in assay development in leishmaniasis drug discovery: a review of the available papers on PubMed from the past year

INTRODUCTION

Leishmaniasis is a significant neglected tropical disease with limited treatment options that urgently requires ongoing efforts in drug discovery. Recent advances have focused on the development of new assays and methods to identify effective therapeutic candidates.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores recent trends and methodologies in leishmaniasis drug discovery, with a particular focus on in silico and in vitro studies, as well as in vivo validation, using animal models. A detailed analysis of recent studies was provided, discussing the methodologies employed, such as manual and automated parasite quantification, and the use of fluorescence and luminescence-based techniques. Additionally, global research trends were analyzed, highlighting the leading countries in scientific output and the collaborative efforts driving advancements in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

The field of leishmaniasis drug discovery has rapidly progressed in the last years, but the lack of standardized methodologies and limited in vivo validation remain significant hurdles. To advance promising treatments to clinical trials, cross-validation of preclinical findings and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential. Increased funding and global partnerships are also crucial to accelerate the discovery and development of alternative and effective therapies.

Compared Antileishmanial Activity of Clomiphene and Tamoxifen

Drug repositioning is an efficient strategy to search for new treatment alternatives that is especially valuable for neglected parasitic diseases such as leishmaniasis. Tamoxifen and raloxifene are selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) that have shown antileishmanial activity. Clomiphene is a SERM structurally similar to tamoxifen, whose antileishmanial potential is unknown. That is why the objective of the present work was to evaluate its antileishmanial activity in vitro and in vivo in comparison with tamoxifen. The inhibitory effect against promastigotes of L. amazonensis, L. major, and L. mexicana was evaluated for both compounds, as well as the cytotoxicity against mouse peritoneal macrophages, the growth inhibitory activity in intracellular amastigotes of L. mexicana, and the in vivo activity in mice experimentally infected with L. mexicana. Clomiphene was about twice as active as tamoxifen against both promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes, with IC50 values of 1.7-3.3 µM for clomiphene and 2.9-6.4 µM for tamoxifen against all three species of promastigotes and 2.8 ± 0.2 µM and 3.7 ± 0.3 µM, respectively, against L. mexicana amastigotes. Clomiphene structurally affected several parasite organelles in a concentration-dependent fashion, leading to the death of both promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes. Interestingly, the macrophage host cell did not appear damaged by any of the clomiphene concentrations tested. With oral administration at 20 mg/kg for 14 days, both compounds showed similar effects in terms of reducing the growth of the lesions, as well as the weight of the lesions and the parasite load at the end of the follow-up period. The results showed the potential of SERMs as antileishmanial drugs and support further testing of clomiphene and other compounds of this pharmacological group.