Perforator flap: A novel method for providing skin cover to lower limb defects

Risk Factors for Postoperative Donor Site Complications in Radial Forearm Free Flaps

Background and Objectives: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is the most commonly used flap for head and neck reconstruction. However, complications at the donor site are its major drawbacks. We aimed to identify the patient comorbidities and factors that predict donor site complications after RFFF. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent RFFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Demographic variables, clinical processes, and postoperative complications were assessed. All variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Sixty-seven patients underwent RFFF reconstruction, and all received a split-thickness skin graft at the donor site. Twenty-five patients experienced delayed skin graft healing, whereas nine experienced sensory changes at the donor site. Hypertension and age had statistically significant negative effects on wound healing. The incidence of hand swelling was related to graft size, and the occurrence of paresthesia was significantly higher in diabetic patients and significantly lower in those with acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Conclusions: Patients with hypertension had a higher risk of prolonged wound healing after RFFF than their normotensive patients. Clinicians should pay particular attention to wound healing strategies in patients with hypertension. Additionally, better neuropathy care is recommended to achieve sensory recovery after RFFF in patients with diabetes. Using a skin graft with ADM could be a method to alleviate neurological symptoms.

Anatomic study of septocutaneous system of the human fetuses' lower leg: peroneal artery

The septocutaneous system of the lower leg perforating blood vessels consists of a vascular basis of fasciocutaneous flaps. This system is of particular importance when designing distally based fasciocutaneous flaps that are the 'workhorse' in reconstructing the distal third of the lower leg and foot. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive, clear and conclusive overview of the lower-leg septocutaneous system of skin blood supply in fetal age. Dissection was conducted on 20 fetuses of both sexes and gestational age from 20 to 28 weeks. The focus was on the vascular anatomy of peroneal artery and its septocutaneous (fasciocutaneous) perforating arterial vessels. Cluster analysis was applied to the obtained data. A total of 212 perforating arterial vessels were identified for peroneal artery. The average number of perforating arterial vessels was 5.32 (ranging from 4 to 7). Based on cluster analysis, perforating blood vessels were more likely to be found at certain lower-leg levels ('safe levels of finding perforators'). The presence of septocutaneous system of perforating blood vessels and reliability of their localization even in the fetal period allows for the application of these findings in the lower leg reconstructions in children of early age.

Lower Limb Muscle Flaps: The Reverse Peroneus Brevis Flap

Chronic ulcerations of the lower extremity centered around the lateral malleolus, medial malleolus, Achilles tendon, or anterior ankle are complex and difficult to heal with conventional treatment modalities. With the evolution of orthoplastics and microsurgery techniques, the peroneus brevis muscle flap has been shown to be simple, versatile, and effective in management of small to medium-sized soft tissue defects that may or may not have exposed bone, tendon, or both. This article reviews the peroneus brevis muscle flap in lower extremity reconstruction and presents pertinent real-world cases of its applications as a tool for limb salvage and orthoplastic reconstruction.

The Clinical Outcome of Perforator Based Sural Artery and Propeller Flaps in Reconstruction of Soft Tissue of Extremities

BACKGROUND

The reconstructive options for the soft tissues in extremities present serious challenges due to thin non-expendable soft tissues and predisposition to massive edema formation, thus frequently requiring flap cover. This study was undertaken to assess the outcome of a modified version of the sural artery flap with that of propeller perforator flaps for the reconstruction of lower extremities, particularly the heel defects.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on 40 consecutive patients, of which 20 treated with sural artery flap and another 20 with perforator based propeller flap cover for soft tissue reconstruction in extremities based on predefined inclusion criteria. The clinical outcome of the flap was assessed after three months.

RESULTS

Inclusion of the posterior tibial perforators (along with the sural artery and the peroneal artery) was shown to enhance the flap territory. The raising of the flap was quick with minimal blood loss and the modified flap had a wide arc of rotation for reconstruction of the heel defects. The younger patients regained sensation on the flap earlier, while the durability of the fasciocutaneous flap was excellent in the heel weight bearing areas. The success rate was 95% flap take.

CONCLUSION

Careful selection of the perforator and optimal designing of the flap result in favorable outcomes with the use of local perforator flaps for reconstruction in extremities. It provides predictable clinical outcomes with minimal donor site morbidity, is cost-effective, relatively easy technique and requires no special microsurgical setup or instruments.

The Clinical Outcome of Perforator Based Sural Artery and Propeller Flaps in Reconstruction of Soft Tissue of Extremities

BACKGROUND

The reconstructive options for the soft tissues in extremities present serious challenges due to thin non-expendable soft tissues and predisposition to massive edema formation, thus frequently requiring flap cover. This study was undertaken to assess the outcome of a modified version of the sural artery flap with that of propeller perforator flaps for the reconstruction of lower extremities, particularly the heel defects.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on 40 consecutive patients, of which 20 treated with sural artery flap and another 20 with perforator based propeller flap cover for soft tissue reconstruction in extremities based on predefined inclusion criteria. The clinical outcome of the flap was assessed after three months.

RESULTS

Inclusion of the posterior tibial perforators (along with the sural artery and the peroneal artery) was shown to enhance the flap territory. The raising of the flap was quick with minimal blood loss and the modified flap had a wide arc of rotation for reconstruction of the heel defects. The younger patients regained sensation on the flap earlier, while the durability of the fasciocutaneous flap was excellent in the heel weight bearing areas. The success rate was 95% flap take.

CONCLUSION

Careful selection of the perforator and optimal designing of the flap result in favorable outcomes with the use of local perforator flaps for reconstruction in extremities. It provides predictable clinical outcomes with minimal donor site morbidity, is cost-effective, relatively easy technique and requires no special microsurgical setup or instruments.

Adipofascial perforator flaps: Its role in reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of lower leg and ankle

Background:

Despite advances in surgical skills, adipofascial flaps are still less preferred option for coverage of leg defect. We evaluate the use of perforator-based adipofascial flap in small-to-medium-sized soft-tissue defects in the lower limb.

Patients and Methods:

After localisation of perforators along the major axial vessels in the lower limb using handheld Doppler, adipofascial flap based on the nearest best perforator of anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery was raised to cover soft-tissue defect in 21 patients. The flap was transposed over the defect and covered by split-skin graft. Donor site was primarily closed. Flap complications, functional and aesthetic outcomes are noted in follow-up.

Results:

There was partial loss of flap in five patients. After debridement and dressings, split-skin grafting was done for four patients and one patient was managed with local flap. Scar over the flap was stable with no reports of recurrent ulceration or breakdown of wound in 6-month follow-up. Four of five patients reported adequate healing of the fractured bone. Average visual analogue score was 8.24/10 for appearance of donor site as evaluated by the patient.

Conclusions:

Perforator-based adipofascial flap is a good alternative for coverage of small-to-medium-sized soft-tissue defect of the leg, particularly over the malleolus and lower part of the leg. Use of adipofascial tissue and primary closure of the donor site causes minimal donor-site morbidity. Adipofascial perforator flap provides aesthetically superior recipient-site scar with satisfactory functional outcome.