Arthroscopic removal of intraarticular fracture fragment after fracture dislocation of hip

Pipkin Type I and II femoral head fractures: internal fixation or excision?-from the hip arthroscopy perspective

The treatment of patients with femoral head fractures with regard to fixation versus excision is controversial. This study aimed to compare the results of fixation and excision in hip arthroscopy-assisted surgery. This retrospective study included adult patients with femoral head fractures who were treated with hip arthroscopy surgery from March 2016 to April 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (fixation group) and Group 2 (excision group). To compare the therapeutic effects between the two groups, clinical and radiographic outcomes, operative time, pain score, length of hospital stay after surgery and related complications were investigated. There were 13 (mean duration, 47.5 months; range, 24-72 months) and 8 (mean duration, 48.6 months; range, 26-74 months) patients in the fixation and excision groups, respectively. The excision group had better functional results than the fixation group in terms of the median modified Harris hip score (P = 0.009). No significant differences were observed in operative time, pain score or hospital stay after surgery between the two groups. Further, no osteonecrosis of the femoral head or traumatic arthritis occurred in either group. A piece of fracture fragment >2 cm can be considered for hip arthroscopy-assisted internal fixation, whereas the others can be removed. The excision group had better outcomes than the fixation group. Hence, hip arthroscopy-assisted internal fixation or excision of bony fragments led to satisfactory short-term clinical and radiological results for the treatment of Pipkin Type I and II femoral head fractures.

Minimally invasive removal of intra-articular hip fragments under navigation guidance

The interposition of foreign bodies between the femoral head and the acetabulum represents a danger to the articular cartilage with a definite progression to osteoarthritis. Their removal is necessary and usually involves two surgical techniques: by open arthrotomy or under arthroscopy. The present article proposes a new surgical technique allowing the removal of intra-articular foreign bodies from the hip by a minimally invasive approach and aCT-guided navigation system. This technique is a good alternative that overcomes some shortcomings of other minimally invasive techniques, which struggle to access the fragment. It can also avoid specific complications of these procedures, such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome with arthroscopy, in the case of an associated acetabulum fracture.

Arthroscopy-Assisted Reduction and Fixation of Femoral Head and Acetabulum Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective

To perform a systematic review to determine the current arthroscopic techniques of the fixation of femoral head and acetabulum fractures and assess the radiological and functional outcomes reported in literature written in English.

Methods

This review was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science without a filter for time limitation in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Protocols (PRISMA‐P) guidelines. Two authors took part in screening and evaluating the literature between December 2020 and January 2021. The terms acetabulum fracture, reduction, fixation, femur head fracture, fracture dislocation of the hip, hip trauma and arthroscopy or arthroscopic, and their combinations were used to search four database engines in the titles and abstracts of the reported papers. Only papers with English titles and abstracts were included. The assessment of the data related to descriptions of the techniques, indications for fracture fixation using arthroscopy, and patient‐related outcomes.

Results

Perfect agreement was detected between the two reviewers during all steps of the review process (κ = 0.81–1.00). Although a meta‐analysis was planned to be carried out, no randomized controlled study comparing either the radiological or functional results of different surgical techniques was detected in the literature. Nineteen studies were included in the study. Of these, 15 were retrospective case reports and four were case series. Twenty‐seven patients were operated on for acetabulum fractures (18 male/nine female). The mean age was 28.3 years (range, 15–53 years). High‐energy traumas including motor vehicle accidents were the most common reason (81%). The duration of follow‐up was a mean of 32 months (range, 12–68 months). Sixteen patients were operated on for femur fractures (12 male/three female). The mean age was 30.1 years (range, 17–50 years). Motor vehicle accident was the most common trauma (70%). Duration of follow‐up had a mean of 18 months (range, 4–60 months). Patient‐related outcomes were excellent for reported cases in both groups despite the fact that an objective scoring system was not used for most of the cases. Moreover, there was no consensus on surgical indications or the techniques.

Conclusions

The techniques of arthroscopic‐assisted fixation of acetabulum and femoral head fracture are so heterogeneous that conclusions cannot be made at this time, but there is potential for this method of treatment to become more popular as the devices used in the procedure develop and as exposure to and experience with hip arthroscopy improves. Further descriptions of reduction and fixation techniques and analysis of outcomes of RCTs are needed.

Status of Hip Arthroscopy in India: A Short Questionnaire Based Survey and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive technology for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in various hip disorders. Over the past decade or so, the technology and understanding related to this surgery have improved by leaps and bounds; however, in India the overall pace has been limited. The present review highlights the status of hip arthroscopy in the Indian context.

METHODOLOGY

A small survey with five questions related to practice of hip arthroscopy among Indian orthopaedic surgeons was conducted. Additionally a PubMed database search was conducted to recognise and assess studies pertaining to hip arthroscopy originating from India.

RESULTS

Forty-two responses were received for the questionnaire, out of which 38 surgeons performed hip arthroscopy in their practice; the overall numbers were very low with only one respondent performing more than 50 surgeries in a year. For 84.2% of the respondents, the practice was limited to less than ten surgeries per year. 63.2% of the surgeons affirmed that there has been no change in their practice of hip arthroscopies over the past 5 years, signifying the slow growth and limited application of the technique. Only nine studies pertaining to the topic were available in the literature search, out of which five were case reports. The most common indication was removal of intraarticular foreign bodies, followed by joint debridement and lavage, synovial biopsies and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The outcomes in all the studies were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Hip arthroscopy is in its nascent stages in India and much is still needed to be done for better implementation of the technique on a wider scale. Adequate training and continued medical education programme, with exposure to the experts in the field, will go a long way in better utilisation of the surgery in India.

[Application of arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach in hip diseases]

Objective

To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 23 cases with hip diseases (23 hips), who were treated with the arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach, between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 9 males and 14 females, aged from 27 to 49 years (mean, 38.6 years). There were 11 cases of posterior dislocation of the hip associated with femoral head fracture (Pipkin typeⅠ) and 7 cases of femoral neck fracture (Garden type Ⅳ). And the interval between injury and operation was 2-8 days (mean, 4.3 days). Five cases were osteonecrosis of femoral head at precollapse stage which were rated as stageⅡA according to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification system. The disease duration was 3-8 months (mean, 5.9 months). The preoperative Harris hip score, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Postel score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were 57.3±8.2, 11.2±3.6, 3.2±1.5, and 7.2±1.3, respectively.

Results

All the wounds healed primarily. Lateral femoral nerve injury occurred in 3 cases. All patients were followed up 8-19 months (mean, 15.6 months). Bone union achieved in all patients after 14-19 weeks (mean, 15.8 weeks) and no secondary osteoarthritis or heterotopic ossification occurred. At last follow-up, the Harris hip score (92.5±5.3), OHS (36.5±5.9), and Postel score (14.2±2.6) were significantly higher than preoperative scores ( t=45.274, P=0.000; t=36.586, P=0.000; t=32.486, P=0.000), and VAS score (1.8±0.9) was significantly lower than preoperative score ( t=21.314, P=0.000).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases can effectively relieve pain, improve hip function, and obtain the satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Arthroscopic Management of Intraarticular Screw Perforation after Surgical Treatment of an Acetabular Posterior Wall Fracture: A Case Report

Although surgical techniques for treating acetabular fracture are evolving, the use of periacetabular screws is common, and their placement in acetabular surgery is still technically demanding. For instance, intraarticular screw perforation is a serious complication that may occur during surgical treatment of an acetabular fracture. Here, we describe the case of a 50-year-old female who experienced an intraarticular screw perforation after surgical treatment of a posterior acetabular wall fracture. Removal of the perforated screw was performed arthroscopically based on its ability to offer minimally invasive access to the hip joint. One year after removal of the screw, no radiological signs of osteoarthritic changes were observed. The patient regained normal ambulation without limitations to range of motion or hip pain. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of arthroscopy to treat intraarticular screw perforation after surgical treatment of an acetabular fracture.

Arthroscopy After Traumatic Hip Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Intra-articular Findings, Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography, Treatments, and Outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the literature concerning patient demographic characteristics and intra-articular injury seen at arthroscopy after traumatic hip dislocation, describe the reported computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance findings with arthroscopic correlation, and describe the reported arthroscopic treatments performed with complications and outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for assessment of arthroscopy after hip dislocation. Three databases were searched, and study screening and data abstraction were performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

Thirty-one heterogeneous case series and case reports were included in the analysis from the initial search yielding 780 results, including reports of 151 patients who underwent arthroscopy after traumatic hip dislocation. A wide spectrum of intra-articular injury was reported, with a high prevalence of labral tears, intra-articular bodies, ligamentum teres injuries, and chondral damage. CT had a sensitivity of 87.3% for detecting intra-articular fragments; however, 43.3% of patients who had a preoperative CT scan with negative findings for intra-articular fragments did show fragments at arthroscopy. Magnetic resonance had a sensitivity of 95.0% for detecting labral tears. There were no major complications directly attributed to arthroscopic surgery. A total of 75 of 151 patients were followed up for a median of 2 years after surgery, with osteoarthritis reported in 4.0% and avascular necrosis in 2.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with traumatic hip dislocation, heterogeneously reported previously published cases show that arthroscopy reveals a broad spectrum of intra-articular damage amenable to arthroscopic intervention. CT is not sensitive in the detection of intra-articular bodies in all cases. Although no serious periprocedural adverse events were reported, only 49.7% of patients had reported follow-up data, and further prospective studies would be necessary to show the safety and efficacy of arthroscopy in comparison with conventional treatment algorithms of hip dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.