A randomized control trial to assess efficacy of Mifepristone in medical management of uterine fibroid

Efficacy and safety of different doses of mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the safety and effectiveness of mifepristone at doses of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

METHODS

The protocol is registered with INPLASY (registration number is INPLASY202460075). Computer retrieval PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase database related (mifepristone group) compared to placebo and mifepristone or conventional treatment (control group) in the treatment of uterine fibroids randomized controlled trial (RCT), retrieve the time limit for a Library to in October 2023, Refer to the Cochrane faced the quality evaluation of the literature of included in the 6.0 and uses the RevMan 5.4.1 software Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

There were 18 studies with a total of 2066 patients as participants. A meta-analysis found that the patients in the mifepristone group had lower uterine volume or uterine fibroid volume than the control group, with a statistically significant difference. Mifepristone treatment for 3 months uterine volume smaller is better than 6 months the difference is statistically significant. Compared with the control group, mifepristone can improve pelvic pain, pelvic pressure, bladder pressure, urinary symptoms, lower back pain, dyspareunia, rectal pain, menorrhagia, hypermenorrhea, and other clinical symptoms. The Mifepristone group had hot flashes, endometrium thickness increases, the incidence of hepatic transaminases associated is significantly higher than the control group, the patients in the 10 mg/d mifepristone group had endometrial thickness that was greater than those in the 5 mg/d mifepristone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone reduces fibroid volume and improves clinical symptoms, and 5 mg/day of mifepristone for three months may be the optimal clinical regimen.

Effect of Mifepristone vs Placebo for Treatment of Adenomyosis With Pain Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Adenomyosis is a common chronic gynecological disorder, and its treatment is an unmet need. New therapies need to be developed. Mifepristone is being tested for adenomyosis treatment.

Objective

To determine whether mifepristone is effective and safe for adenomyosis treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 10 hospitals in China. In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis pain symptoms were enrolled. Trial enrollment began in May 2018 and was completed in April 2019, and analyses were conducted from October 2019 to February 2020.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive mifepristone 10 mg or placebo orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the change in adenomyosis-associated dysmenorrhea intensity, evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the change in menstrual blood loss, increased level of hemoglobin in patients with anemia, CA125 level, platelet count, and uterine volume after 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, vital signs, gynecological examinations, and laboratory evaluations.

Results

In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea were randomly assigned, and 126 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, including 61 patients (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [4.6] years) randomized to receive mifepristone and 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [5.0] years) randomized to received the placebo. The characteristics of the included patients at baseline were similar between groups. The mean (SD) change in VAS score was -6.63 (1.92) in the mifepristone group and -0.95 (1.75) in the placebo group (P < .001). The total remission rates for dysmenorrhea in the mifepristone group were significantly better than those in the placebo group (effective remission: 56 patients [91.8%] vs 15 patients [23.1%]; complete remission: 54 patients [88.5%] vs 4 patients [6.2%]). All the secondary end points showed significant improvements after mifepristone treatment for menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin (mean [SD] change from baseline: 2.13 [1.38] g/dL vs 0.48 [0.97] g/dL; P < .001), CA125 (mean [SD] change from baseline: -62.23 [76.99] U/mL vs 26.89 [118.70] U/mL; P < .001), platelet count (mean [SD] change from baseline: -28.87 [54.30]×103/µL vs 2.06 [41.78]×103/µL; P < .001), and uterine volume (mean [SD] change from baseline: -29.32 [39.34] cm3 vs 18.39 [66.46] cm3; P < .001). Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between groups, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial showed that mifepristone could be a new option for treating patients with adenomyosis, based on its efficacy and acceptable tolerability.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03520439.

Mifepristone: A Safe Method of Medical Abortion and Self-Managed Medical Abortion in the Post-Roe Era

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on June 24, 2022 effectively overturned federal constitutional protections for abortion that have existed since 1973 and returned jurisdiction to the states. Several states implemented abortion bans, some of which banned abortion after 6 weeks and others that permit abortion under limited exceptions, such as if the health or the life of the woman is in danger. Other states introduced bills that define life as beginning at fertilization. As a result of these new and proposed laws, the future availability of mifepristone, one of two drugs used for medical abortion in the United States, has become the topic of intense debate and speculation.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Although its safety and effectiveness has been confirmed by many studies, the use of mifepristone has been politicized regularly since its approval. Areas of future study include mifepristone for induction termination and fetal demise in the third trimester and the management of leiomyoma.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Society of Family Planning, American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists, the World Health Organization.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

The use of no-touch medical abortion, which entails providing a medical abortion via a telehealth platform without a screening ultrasound or bloodwork, expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and studies have confirmed its safety. With the Dobbs decision, legal abortion will be less accessible and, consequently, self-managed abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol will become more prevalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone and misoprostol are extremely safe medications with many applications. In the current changing political climate, physicians and pregnancy-capable individuals must have access to these medications.

Network meta-analysis of 6 kinds of Chinese patent medicines combined with mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Uterine fibroids are benign. They belong to the category of "abdominal mass" in traditional Chinese medicine, and pathogenesis is mainly caused by weakness of the body, qi stagnation, and blood stasis. Drug therapy is the preferred treatment of uterine fibroids in clinical practice, and mifepristone is the most commonly used drug. In the past decade, a large number of clinical randomized controlled trials have proven that Chinese patent medicine combined with mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids has a better curative effect, fewer adverse reactions, and higher safety than mifepristone alone. However, there is a lack of evidence-based research. This study aims to integrate clinical data through network meta-analysis to provide more evidence-based medical evidence for clinical medication.

METHODS

The comprehensive search included Chinese and other-language databases, such as MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Scientific Journal Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database. Clinical randomized controlled trials of 6 Chinese patent medicines combined with mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids, including Guizhi Fuling Capsule, Gongliuxiao Capsule, Gongliuqing Capsule, Danbie Capsule, Gongliuning Capsule, and Xiaojiean Capsule were retrieved. The search period was from January 2010 to April 2021. Two researchers screened the literature through EndNote and used Excel to extract data. RevMan 5.3 was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. Treatment measures were analyzed in R language, and a forest map and probability ranking map of various interventions were drawn. The network evidence map and correction comparison funnel map of various interventions were drawn by STATA 14.0 software.

RESULTS

This study provides the clinical efficacy and safety of network meta-analysis of 6 kinds of Chinese patent medicines combined with mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids will be systematically evaluated or descriptively analyzed.

CONCLUSION

This study's purpose is to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of uterine fibroids to choose more effective intervention therapies.

Mifepristone in Fibroids: Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Biweekly Dosage Vs Daily Dosage Schedule

Background

Leiomyomas are the most prevalent benign tumors of the uterus and are seen more with increasing age. 50 mg biweekly dose was compared with 25 mg daily dose in terms of efficacy and safety in symptomatic women as the biweekly dose maybe an economically better alternative. Two different dosages of mifepristone for medical management of fibroids were compared in terms of efficacy and safety in symptomatic women.

Materials and Methods

Ninety-two women were recruited who fulfilled the criteria after informed consent and were randomized in two groups. Sample size was calculated on the basis of earlier literature, for response in terms of reduction in fibroid volume, assuming 1% level of significance and 95 % power of study, the optimum sample size came out to be minimum 27 in each group. Assuming loss to follow up of few patients, we took 45 patients in group 1 and 47 patients in group 2. Group 1 was given mifepristone in a dose of 25 mg once a day and Group 2 was given mifepristone 50 mg biweekly for 3 months. Fibroid volume, uterine volume, endometrial thickness, pictorial blood loss assessment chart score, hemoglobin levels, and liver transaminases were recorded at the beginning and at the end of treatment. Side effects were noted at the end of the treatment.

Results

Both the dosages lead to improvement in symptoms of the patients. Mifepristone significantly reduced fibroid volume in both the groups, but the difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.99). Mifepristone treatment significantly reduced bleeding and increased hemoglobin levels in both the groups. The side effects were mild and tolerable.

Conclusion

Mifepristone in both dosages is highly efficacious in causing amenorrhea, improving anemia, and enhancing the quality of life, and hence 50 mg biweekly dosage shows potential for being cost efficient.

Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review

Background

Pictorial blood loss assessment charts (PBACs) represent the most widely used method to assess menstrual blood loss (MBL) in clinical trials. The aims of this review were to: (1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of PBACs that have been validated against the reference alkaline hematin technique; (2) categorize the pitfalls of using obsolete and nonvalidated charts; (3) provide guidelines for development of a new PBAC or use of an existing chart to measure MBL in clinical trials; and (4) consider the feasibility of using pictorial charts in primary care.

Methods

A literature review was conducted using Embase and MEDLINE databases. The review identified reports of women with self-perceived or actual heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), bleeding disorders, abnormal uterine bleeding, leiomyomata (uterine fibroids) or endometriosis, and women undergoing treatment for HMB, as well as those with normal menstrual periods. Data were reviewed from studies that focused on the development and validation of PBACs and from those that used derivative noncertified charts to assess HMB.

Results

Nine studies reported validation of PBAC scoring systems against the alkaline hematin technique. Across these studies, the sensitivity was 58–97%, the specificity was 7.5–95.5%, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.1–13.8 and 0.14–0.56, respectively, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 2.6–52.4. The cut-off score above which the diagnosis of HMB was made ranged from 50 to 185. Several modifications of these PBACs were used in other studies; however, objective confirmation of their validity was not reported. Overall, there was widespread inconsistency of chart design, scoring systems, diagnostic cut-off limits and post-treatment outcome measures.

Conclusions

PBACs are best suited to the controlled and specific environment of clinical studies, where clinical outcome parameters are defined. The current lack of standardization precludes widespread use of the PBAC in primary care.

Review registration number

PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD42016030083.

A new trick for an old dog: The application of mifepristone in the treatment of adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is also called internal endometriosis and affects about 20% of reproductive‐aged women. It seriously reduces life quality of patients because current drug therapies face with numerous challenges. Long‐term clinical application of mifepristone exhibits wonderful therapeutic effects with mild side‐effects in many disorders since 1982. Since adenomyosis is a refractory disease, we investigate whether mifepristone can be applied in the treatment of adenomyosis. In this study, we investigated the direct effects of mifepristone on human primary eutopic endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells in adenomyosis. We found that mifepristone causes cell cycle arrest through inhibiting CDK1 and CDK2 expressions and induces cell apoptosis via the mitochondria‐dependent signalling pathway in endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells of adenomyosis. Furthermore, mifepristone inhibits the migration of endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells through decreasing CXCR4 expression and restricts the invasion of endometrial epithelial cells via suppression of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in adenomyosis. We also found that mifepristone treatment decreases the uterine volume, CA125 concentration and increases the haemoglobin concentration in serum for adenomyosis patients. Therefore, we demonstrate that mifepristone could serve as a novel therapeutic drug in the treatment of adenomyosis, and therefore, the old dog can do a new trick.

Uterine fibroids: an update on current and emerging medical treatment options

Uterine fibroids are the most common gynecological disorder, classically requiring surgery when symptomatic. Although attempts at finding a nonsurgical cure date back to centuries, it is only around the middle of the last century that serious attempts at a medical treatment were carried out. Initially, both progestins and estrogen–progestin combinations have been utilized, although proof of their usefulness is lacking. A major step forward was achieved when peptide analogs of the GnRH were introduced, first those with superagonist properties and subsequently those acting as antagonists. Initially, the latter produced side effects preventing their routine utilization; eventually, this problem was overcome following the synthesis of cetrorelix. Because both types of analogs produce hypoestrogenism, their use is limited to a maximum of 6 months and, for this reason, today they are utilized as an adjuvant treatment before surgery with overall good results. Over the last decade, new, nonpeptidic, orally active GnRH-receptor blockers have also been synthesized. One of them, Elagolix, is in the early stages of testing in women with fibroids. Another fundamental development has been the utilization of the so-called selective progesterone receptor modulators, sometimes referred to as “antiprogestins”. The first such compound to be applied to the long-term treatment of fibroids was Mifepristone; today, this compound is mostly used outside of Western Countries, where the substance of choice is Ulipristal acetate. Large clinical trials have proven the effectiveness of Ulipristal in the long-term medical therapy of fibroids, although some caution must be exercised because of the rare occurrence of liver complications. All selective progesterone receptor modulators produce unique endometrial changes that are today considered benign, reversible, and without negative consequences. In conclusion, long-term medical treatment of fibroids seems possible today, especially in premenopausal women.