A Shift in Molecular Drivers of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Following the 2017 World Health Organization Classification: Characterization of 554 Consecutive Tumors With Emphasis on BRAF-Negative Cases

A computational approach to assessing the prognostic implications of BRAF and RAS mutations in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common thyroid cancer, posing a growing clinical challenge. PTC exhibits two age-related peaks, with established risk factors including family history and radiation exposure. Managing even low-risk, localized PTC cases remain complex, with growing interest in active surveillance as an alternative to immediate surgery. This study employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) to explore the predictive value of BRAF and RAS mutations in PTC, shedding light on their impact on disease progression and outcomes. The analyses emphasized the significance of BRAF and RAS mutations in tumor advancement, particularly the unique BRAF V600E mutation associated with aggressive features. The methodology involved scRNA-Seq analysis of PTC and normal samples, unveiling distinct cell clusters and indicating upregulated BRAF and RAS genes. Pathway enrichment analysis highlighted altered biological processes and immune-related pathways in PTC. The study consolidated previous research showing the prevalence of BRAF and RAS mutations in PTC, subtypes with distinct molecular profiles, and the impact of TERT promoter mutations on disease severity. In summary, this study unveils the complex interplay of genetic mutations and the cellular microenvironment in PTC through scRNA-Seq. The upregulated BRAF and RAS genes suggest their roles as PTC drivers, and pathway enrichment reveals alterations in immune-related processes. This synthesis of prior research enhances our understanding of PTC's molecular foundations, informing better prognosis and personalized treatment approaches. These insights advance the landscape of PTC management and provide directions for further research.

A comparison of the histopathologic features of thyroid carcinomas with NTRK fusions to those with other malignant fusions

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal rearrangements involving one of the NTRK genes result in oncogenic driver mutations in thyroid carcinoma (TC) and serve as a target for therapy. We compared the clinicopathologic features of thyroid carcinomas with NTRK fusions vs. thyroid neoplasms with other malignancy associated gene fusions within our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our pathology archives were searched from 2013 to 2023 for thyroid neoplasms with gene fusions, excluding THADA fusions and medullary thyroid carcinomas.

RESULTS

55 thyroid lesions were identified: 22 with NTRK fusions (NTRK cohort) and 33 with other fusions (non-NTRK cohort). On fine needle aspiration (FNA), 54% of the NTRK cohort were classified as Category V as per Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) and 51.5% of non-NTRK cohort as TBSRTC Category III. In the NTRK cohort, the most common reported fusion was ETV6::NTRK3 and the most common reported fusion in the non-NTRK cohort was PAX8::PPAR-gamma. On histologic examination both cohorts were most commonly diagnosed as PTC follicular variant. Invasive features were more common in the NTRK cohort in comparison to the non-NTRK cohort. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 2/22 NTRK cases and 2/33 non-NTRK cases, with average time from surgery to recurrence being 5.5 months and 21 months, respectively. The majority of patients in both groups are alive with no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Thyroid neoplasms with a malignancy associated gene fusion are likely to be diagnosed as subtype/variant of PTC. Patients whose thyroid lesions harbor NTRK fusions present with a PTC-FV that on presentation has more aggressive clinicopathologic findings and are likely to have earlier disease recurrence.

Clinicopathologic Features and Cytologic Correlation of ALK-Rearranged Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Series of Eight Cases

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusions are rare in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) but may serve as a therapeutic target. This study aims to evaluate the preoperative cytologic findings and clinicopathologic features of a series of eight ALK-rearranged PTCs from our pathology archives and consultations. All cases were confirmed by ALK D5F3 immunohistochemistry and six with additional targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). The original fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology diagnosis included the Bethesda System (TBS) category II in three (37.5%), TBS III in two (25%), TBS V in two (25%), and TBS VI in one (12.5%). Six cases had available FNA cytology and were reviewed. The cytologic features showed microfollicular architecture as well as limited or reduced nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations in all six. Nuclear grooves and pseudoinclusions were absent in two cases, rarely or focally noted in three, and frequently found in one. Two cases initially diagnosed as TBS II, showing microfollicular architecture without well-developed nuclear features, were revised to TBS III (with architectural atypia only). For histologic correlations, four were infiltrative follicular variant PTCs, three as classic subtype PTC with predominant follicular growth, and one as solid/trabecular subtype PTC. All eight cases demonstrated reduced PTC nuclear features with respect to nuclear elongation and chromatin alterations compared to those typically identified in "BRAF-like" PTCs. The NGS testing revealed EML4::ALK fusion in three, STRN::ALK fusion in two, and ITSN2::ALK fusion in one. In conclusion, although ALK-rearranged PTCs have been associated with neutral gene expression profile from a BRAF-RAS scoring perspective, the "RAS-like" nuclear features were more commonly identified in this series, resulting in frequent indeterminate diagnosis of preoperative FNA.

Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas With Discordant Molecular Drivers: Emphasizing the Morphology and Collision Tumors

Multifocal papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) are common and the majority of the tumors harbor mutual BRAF p.V600E mutation. This study aimed to investigate a contemporary series of multifocal PTCs with discordant molecular drivers. Consecutive thyroidectomies diagnosed with multifocal PTCs ≥0.5 cm between 2019 and 2023 were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BRAF VE1 was performed for all tumors. Cases with discordant BRAF IHC results or morphologic discrepancy were identified, and BRAF IHC-negative tumors were subjected to RAS Q61R IHC and/or targeted RNA next-generation sequencing. A total of 770 patients with a main PTC ≥0.5 cm were identified; 255 (33.1%) had multifocal disease, and 142 (18.4%) had at least another PTC ≥0.5 cm. Among them, 13 cases (9.2%, 13/142) had discordant molecular drivers. Twelve cases had one or more BRAF-positive PTCs accompanied by a BRAF-negative PTC (3 with CCDC6::RET fusion, 1 with NCOA4::RET fusion, 1 with ACBD5::RET fusion, 2 with ETV6::NTRK3 fusion, 1 with TG::FGFR1 fusion, 1 with LMTK2::BRAF fusion, 1 with AGK::BRAF fusion and RAS p.Q61R mutation, 1 with RAS p.Q61R mutation, and 1 without detectable molecular drivers). The last case had tumors with discordant fusion drivers (VIM::NTRK3 and TNS1::BRAF). Most cases showed tumors that were morphologically distinct (92.3%, 12/13) and occurred in the contralateral lobes (76.9%, 10/13). Notably, we identified 4 cases (30.8%) that presented as collision tumors and 6 cases (46.2%) that showed lymph node metastases, including 2 with simultaneous involvement by tumors with discordant molecular drivers, as novel findings. In summary, a subset (9.2%) of multifocal PTCs had discordant molecular drivers and 84.6% of them were a combination of BRAF-positive and kinase gene fusion-associated PTCs, most with distinct morphologies. Almost half of the cases had nodal metastasis and a third of them showed simultaneous involvement by tumors with discordant molecular drivers. The results highlight the clinical importance of identifying such cases, given the potentially different treatments.

Difficulties of Preoperative Diagnosis of Cribriform Morular Thyroid Carcinoma

Background

Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma has been recently renamed in the 2022 WHO classification as a thyroid tumor of uncertain histogenesis. The epidemiologic, pathological, and pathophysiological characteristics distinguish it from papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Preoperative genetic testing plays a role in facilitating the differential diagnosis.

Methods

This report presents a confirmed case of cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma. Initially, fine-needle aspiration cytology suggested a diagnosis of PTC. However, a genetic analysis did not reveal the typical mutations associated with follicular-cell-derived neoplasms.

Results

A 31-year-old woman was found to have a thyroid nodule at the left lobe measuring 11.8 × 10.2 × 12.4 mm. Ultrasonography indicated a hypoechoic, solid nodule with regular margins. Cytology revealed a papillary structure of tall cells, leading to a PTC diagnosis. Nevertheless, the genetic analysis failed to detect mutations such as BRAF V600E, NRAS Q61R, NRAS Q61K, HRAS Q61R, or HRAS Q61K mutation or the fusion of CCDC6-RET, NCOA4-RET, PAX8-PPARG, ETV6-NTRK3, TPM3-NTRK1, IRF2BP2-NTRK1, or SQSTM1-NTRK1 in the aspirated follicular cells. The patient subsequently underwent total thyroidectomy with central lymph node dissection. Pathological examination revealed a cribriform pattern of spindle-shaped cells with morular areas. Immunohistochemical staining showed positive results for β-catenin and TTF-1, except in the morular regions, and negative results for PAX8, thyroglobulin, and BRAF (clone VE1). The diagnosis was confirmed to be cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma.

Conclusion

Significant cytological similarity exists between PTC and cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma. Preoperative genetic analysis is important to differentiate these two diseases. Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma can be differentiated from common follicular-cell-derived tumors by the absence of typical mutations; the presence of nuclear and cytoplasmic expressions of β-catenin; the presence of TTF-1, except in morular areas; and the absence of thyroglobulin.

BRAF V600E Mutation Lacks Association with Poorer Clinical Prognosis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previous literatures showed wide range of prevalence of BRAF V600E in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The correlation of BRAF V600E mutation with aggressive tumor characteristics and poor prognosis is controversial. The present study was designed to evaluate the association between BRAF V600E mutation with clinicopathological factors and tumor recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 672 patients who underwent thyroid surgery for PTC during 2013 and 2018. The prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation was studied. Its correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics and aggressive features, including macroscopic extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, were analyzed with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 672 patients who underwent surgical treatment for PTC were included in this study with a mean age of 49.7 (± 13.2) years; 76.8% of the patients were detected with BRAF V600E mutation. Mean tumor size was 1.30 (± 1.07) cm. A significant association was demonstrated between negative BRAF V600E and larger primary tumor size, distant metastasis, and advanced staging (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant association with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, and multicentricity. Kaplan-Meier curve showed similar disease-free survival rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative BRAF V600E tumors show more aggressive behavior with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis in patients with PTC. The usefulness of BRAF in predicting the prognosis of PTC remains questionable. Further molecular analysis should be conducted for contribution to aggressive tumor phenotype.

Agnostic Administration of Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Looking for a Balance between Hype and Caution

Many tumors have well-defined vulnerabilities, thus potentially allowing highly specific and effective treatment. There is a spectrum of actionable genetic alterations which are shared across various tumor types and, therefore, can be targeted by a given drug irrespective of tumor histology. Several agnostic drug-target matches have already been approved for clinical use, e.g., immune therapy for tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or high tumor mutation burden (TMB), NTRK1-3 and RET inhibitors for cancers carrying rearrangements in these kinases, and dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF V600E mutated malignancies. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that this histology-independent approach is also reasonable for tumors carrying ALK and ROS1 translocations, biallelic BRCA1/2 inactivation and/or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), strong HER2 amplification/overexpression coupled with the absence of other MAPK pathway-activating mutations, etc. On the other hand, some well-known targets are not agnostic: for example, PD-L1 expression is predictive for the efficacy of PD-L1/PD1 inhibitors only in some but not all cancer types. Unfortunately, the individual probability of finding a druggable target in a given tumor is relatively low, even with the use of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. Nevertheless, the rapidly growing utilization of NGS will significantly increase the number of patients with highly unusual or exceptionally rare tumor-target combinations. Clinical trials may provide only a framework for treatment attitudes, while the decisions for individual patients usually require case-by-case consideration of the probability of deriving benefit from agnostic versus standard therapy, drug availability, associated costs, and other circumstances. The existing format of data dissemination may not be optimal for agnostic cancer medicine, as conventional scientific journals are understandably biased towards the publication of positive findings and usually discourage the submission of case reports. Despite all the limitations and concerns, histology-independent drug-target matching is certainly feasible and, therefore, will be increasingly utilized in the future.