Two distinct components of release factor function uncovered by nucleophile partitioning analysis

Human mtRF1 terminates COX1 translation and its ablation induces mitochondrial ribosome-associated quality control

Translation termination requires release factors that read a STOP codon in the decoding center and subsequently facilitate the hydrolysis of the nascent peptide chain from the peptidyl tRNA within the ribosome. In human mitochondria eleven open reading frames terminate in the standard UAA or UAG STOP codon, which can be recognized by mtRF1a, the proposed major mitochondrial release factor. However, two transcripts encoding for COX1 and ND6 terminate in the non-conventional AGA or AGG codon, respectively. How translation termination is achieved in these two cases is not known. We address this long-standing open question by showing that the non-canonical release factor mtRF1 is a specialized release factor that triggers COX1 translation termination, while mtRF1a terminates the majority of other mitochondrial translation events including the non-canonical ND6. Loss of mtRF1 leads to isolated COX deficiency and activates the mitochondrial ribosome-associated quality control accompanied by the degradation of COX1 mRNA to prevent an overload of the ribosome rescue system. Taken together, these results establish the role of mtRF1 in mitochondrial translation, which had been a mystery for decades, and lead to a comprehensive picture of translation termination in human mitochondria.

Rate-limiting hydrolysis in ribosomal release reactions revealed by ester activation

Translation terminates by releasing the polypeptide chain in one of two chemical reactions catalyzed by the ribosome. Release is also a target for engineering, as readthrough of a stop codon enables incorporation of unnatural amino acids and treatment of genetic diseases. Hydrolysis of the ester bond of peptidyl-tRNA requires conformational changes of both a class I release factor (RF) protein and the peptidyl transferase center of a large subunit rRNA. The rate-limiting step was proposed to be hydrolysis at physiological pH and an RF conformational change at higher pH, but evidence was indirect. Here, we tested this by activating the ester electrophile at the Escherichia coli ribosomal P site using a trifluorine-substituted amino acid. Quench-flow kinetics revealed that RF1-catalyzed release could be accelerated, but only at pH 6.2-7.7 and not higher pH. This provided direct evidence for rate-limiting hydrolysis at physiological or lower pH and a different rate limitation at higher pH. Additionally, we optimized RF-free release catalyzed by unacylated tRNA or the CCA trinucleotide (in 30% acetone). We determined that these two model release reactions, although very slow, were surprisingly accelerated by the trifluorine analog but to a different extent from each other and from RF-catalyzed release. Hence, hydrolysis was rate limiting in all three reactions. Furthermore, in 20% ethanol, we found that there was significant competition between fMet-ethyl ester formation and release in all three release reactions. We thus favor proposed mechanisms for translation termination that do not require a fully-negatively-charged OH⁻ nucleophile.

Sequential rescue and repair of stalled and damaged ribosome by bacterial PrfH and RtcB

RtcB is involved in transfer RNA (tRNA) splicing in archaeal and eukaryotic organisms. However, most RtcBs are found in bacteria, whose tRNAs have no introns. Because tRNAs are the substrates of archaeal and eukaryotic RtcB, it is assumed that bacterial RtcBs are for repair of damaged tRNAs. Here, we show that a subset of bacterial RtcB, denoted RtcB2 herein, specifically repair ribosomal damage in the decoding center. To access the damage site for repair, however, the damaged 70S ribosome needs to be dismantled first, and this is accomplished by bacterial PrfH. Peptide-release assays revealed that PrfH is only active with the damaged 70S ribosome but not with the intact one. A 2.55-Å cryo-electron microscopy structure of PrfH in complex with the damaged 70S ribosome provides molecular insight into PrfH discriminating between the damaged and the intact ribosomes via specific recognition of the cleaved 3'-terminal nucleotide. RNA repair assays demonstrated that RtcB2 efficiently repairs the damaged 30S ribosomal subunit but not the damaged tRNAs. Cell-based assays showed that the RtcB2-PrfH pair reverse the damage inflicted by ribosome-specific ribotoxins in vivo. Thus, our combined biochemical, structural, and cell-based studies have uncovered a bacterial defense system specifically evolved to reverse the lethal ribosomal damage in the decoding center for cell survival.

The Role of Release Factors in the Hydrolysis of Ester Bond in Peptidyl-tRNA

Class I release factors (RFs) recognize stop codons in the sequences of mRNAs and are required for the hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA in the ribosomal P site during the final step of protein synthesis in bacteria, resulting in the release of a complete polypeptide chain from the ribosome. A key role in this process belongs to the highly conserved GGQ motif in RFs. Mutations in this motif can reduce the hydrolysis rate or even completely inhibit the reaction. Previously, it was hypothesized that the amino acid residues of GGQ (especially glutamine) are essential for the proper coordination of the water molecule for subsequent hydrolysis of the ester bond. However, available structures of the 70S ribosome termination complex do not allow unambiguous identification of the exact orientation of the carbonyl group in peptidyl-tRNA relative to the GGQ, as well as of the position of the catalytic water molecule in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). This mini-review summarizes key facts and hypotheses on the role of GGQ in the catalysis of peptide release, as well as suggests and discusses future experiments aimed to produce high-quality structural data for deciphering the precise mechanism of RF-mediated catalysis.

Diversity and Similarity of Termination and Ribosome Rescue in Bacterial, Mitochondrial, and Cytoplasmic Translation

When a ribosome encounters the stop codon of an mRNA, it terminates translation, releases the newly made protein, and is recycled to initiate translation on a new mRNA. Termination is a highly dynamic process in which release factors (RF1 and RF2 in bacteria; eRF1•eRF3•GTP in eukaryotes) coordinate peptide release with large-scale molecular rearrangements of the ribosome. Ribosomes stalled on aberrant mRNAs are rescued and recycled by diverse bacterial, mitochondrial, or cytoplasmic quality control mechanisms. These are catalyzed by rescue factors with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase activity (bacterial ArfA•RF2 and ArfB, mitochondrial ICT1 and mtRF-R, and cytoplasmic Vms1), that are distinct from each other and from release factors. Nevertheless, recent structural studies demonstrate a remarkable similarity between translation termination and ribosome rescue mechanisms. This review describes how these pathways rely on inherent ribosome dynamics, emphasizing the active role of the ribosome in all translation steps.

Structural basis for the tryptophan sensitivity of TnaC-mediated ribosome stalling

Free L-tryptophan (L-Trp) stalls ribosomes engaged in the synthesis of TnaC, a leader peptide controlling the expression of the Escherichia coli tryptophanase operon. Despite extensive characterization, the molecular mechanism underlying the recognition and response to L-Trp by the TnaC-ribosome complex remains unknown. Here, we use a combined biochemical and structural approach to characterize a TnaC variant (R23F) with greatly enhanced sensitivity for L-Trp. We show that the TnaC-ribosome complex captures a single L-Trp molecule to undergo termination arrest and that nascent TnaC prevents the catalytic GGQ loop of release factor 2 from adopting an active conformation at the peptidyl transferase center. Importantly, the L-Trp binding site is not altered by the R23F mutation, suggesting that the relative rates of L-Trp binding and peptidyl-tRNA cleavage determine the tryptophan sensitivity of each variant. Thus, our study reveals a strategy whereby a nascent peptide assists the ribosome in detecting a small metabolite.

GGQ methylation enhances both speed and accuracy of stop codon recognition by bacterial class-I release factors

Accurate translation termination in bacteria requires correct recognition of the stop codons by the class-I release factors (RFs) RF1 and RF2, which release the nascent peptide from the peptidyl tRNA after undergoing a "compact to open" conformational transition. These RFs possess a conserved Gly-Gly-Gln (GGQ) peptide release motif, of which the Q residue is posttranslationally methylated. GGQ-methylated RFs have been shown to be faster in peptide release than the unmethylated ones, but it was unknown whether this modification had additional roles. Using a fluorescence-based real-time in vitro translation termination assay in a stopped-flow instrument, we demonstrate that methylated RF1 and RF2 are two- to four-fold more accurate in the cognate stop codon recognition than their unmethylated variants. Using pH titration, we show that the lack of GGQ methylation facilitates the "compact to open" transition, which results in compromised accuracy of the unmethylated RFs. Furthermore, thermal melting studies using circular dichroism and SYPRO-orange fluorescence demonstrate that GGQ methylation increases overall stability of the RF proteins. This increased stability, we suspect, is the basis for the more controlled conformational change of the methylated RFs upon codon recognition, which enhances both their speed and accuracy. This GGQ methylation-based modulation of the accuracy of RFs can be a tool for regulating translational termination in vivo.

Ribosome quality control antagonizes the activation of the integrated stress response on colliding ribosomes

Stalling during translation triggers ribosome quality control (RQC) to maintain proteostasis. Recently, stalling has also been linked to the activation of integrated stress response (ISR) by Gcn2. How the two processes are coordinated is unclear. Here, we show that activation of RQC by Hel2 suppresses that of Gcn2. We further show that Hel2 and Gcn2 are activated by a similar set of agents that cause ribosome stalling, with maximal activation of Hel2 observed at a lower frequency of stalling. Interestingly, inactivation of one pathway was found to result in the overactivation of the other, suggesting that both are activated by the same signal of ribosome collisions. Notably, the processes do not appear to be in direct competition with each other; ISR prefers a vacant A site, whereas RQC displays no preference. Collectively, our findings provide important details about how multiple pathways that recognize stalled ribosomes coordinate to mount the appropriate response.

The regulatory TnaC nascent peptide preferentially inhibits release factor 2-mediated hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA

The tnaC regulatory gene from the tna operon of Escherichia coli controls the transcription of its own operon through an attenuation mechanism relying on the accumulation of arrested ribosomes during inhibition of its own translation termination. This free l-Trp-dependent mechanism of inhibition of translation termination remains unclear. Here, we analyzed the inhibitory effects of l-Trp on the function of two known E. coli translation termination factors, RF1 and RF2. Using a series of reporter genes, we found that the in vivo l-Trp sensitivity of tnaC gene expression is influenced by the identity of its stop codon, with the UGA stop codon producing higher expression efficiency of the tnaA-lacZ gene construct than the UAG stop codon. In vitro TnaC-peptidyl-tRNA accumulation and toe-printing assays confirmed that in the presence of l-Trp, the UGA stop codon generates higher accumulation of both TnaC-peptidyl-tRNA and arrested ribosomes than does the UAG stop codon. RF-mediated hydrolysis assays corroborated that l-Trp blocks RF2 function more than that of RF1. Mutational analyses disclosed that amino acids substitutions at the 246 and 256 residue positions surrounding the RF2-GGQ functional motif reduce l-Trp-dependent expression of the tnaC(UGA) tnaA-lacZ construct and the ability of l-Trp to inhibit RF2-mediated cleavage of the TnaC-peptidyl-tRNA. Altogether, our results indicate that l-Trp preferentially blocks RF2 activity during translation termination of the tnaC gene. This inhibition depends on the identities of amino acid residues surrounding the RF2-GGQ functional motif.

Assaying RNA structure with LASER-Seq

Chemical probing methods are crucial to our understanding of the structure and function of RNA molecules. The majority of chemical methods used to probe RNA structure report on Watson–Crick pairing, but tertiary structure parameters such as solvent accessibility can provide an additional layer of structural information, particularly in RNA-protein complexes. Herein we report the development of Light Activated Structural Examination of RNA by high-throughput sequencing, or LASER-Seq, for measuring RNA structure in cells with deep sequencing. LASER relies on a light-generated nicotinoyl nitrenium ion to form covalent adducts with the C8 position of adenosine and guanosine. Reactivity is governed by the accessibility of C8 to the light-generated probe. We compare structure probing by RT-stop and mutational profiling (MaP), demonstrating that LASER can be integrated with both platforms for RNA structure analyses. We find that LASER reactivity correlates with solvent accessibility across the entire ribosome, and that LASER can be used to rapidly survey for ligand binding sites in an unbiased fashion. LASER has a particular advantage in this last application, as it readily modifies paired nucleotides, enabling the identification of binding sites and conformational changes in highly structured RNA.

The Origin and Evolution of Release Factors: Implications for Translation Termination, Ribosome Rescue, and Quality Control Pathways

The evolution of release factors catalyzing the hydrolysis of the final peptidyl-tRNA bond and the release of the polypeptide from the ribosome has been a longstanding paradox. While the components of the translation apparatus are generally well-conserved across extant life, structurally unrelated release factor peptidyl hydrolases (RF-PHs) emerged in the stems of the bacterial and archaeo-eukaryotic lineages. We analyze the diversification of RF-PH domains within the broader evolutionary framework of the translation apparatus. Thus, we reconstruct the possible state of translation termination in the Last Universal Common Ancestor with possible tRNA-like terminators. Further, evolutionary trajectories of the several auxiliary release factors in ribosome quality control (RQC) and rescue pathways point to multiple independent solutions to this problem and frequent transfers between superkingdoms including the recently characterized ArfT, which is more widely distributed across life than previously appreciated. The eukaryotic RQC system was pieced together from components with disparate provenance, which include the long-sought-after Vms1/ANKZF1 RF-PH of bacterial origin. We also uncover an under-appreciated evolutionary driver of innovation in rescue pathways: effectors deployed in biological conflicts that target the ribosome. At least three rescue pathways (centered on the prfH/RFH, baeRF-1, and C12orf65 RF-PH domains), were likely innovated in response to such conflicts.

Intracellular Antimicrobial Peptides Targeting the Protein Synthesis Machinery

While antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are well-known for their disruptive effects on bacterial membranes, the mechanism of many intracellular AMPs is still being elucidated. In the recent years, it has been demonstrated that the subclass of proline-rich AMPs (PrAMPs) can pass through the bacterial membrane and kill bacteria by inhibiting protein synthesis. PrAMPs are a product of the innate immune system and are secreted in response to bacterial infection. So far PrAMPs have been identified in many arthropods, such as beetles, wasps, and flies, as well as some mammals, such as sheep, cows, and goats. PrAMPs show high potency against Gram-negative bacteria, while exhibiting low toxicity in eukaryotes, suggesting that they may represent a promising avenue for the development of future antimicrobial agents to combat the increase of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Structural and biochemical data have revealed the PrAMP binding sites on the ribosome as well as insight into their mechanisms of action. While the binding site of all so far investigated PrAMPs is situated within nascent polypeptide exit tunnel, the mechanism of action is distinct between class I and II PrAMPs. Specifically, class I PrAMPs, such as Bac7, Onc112, pyrrhocoricin, and metalnikowin, block the delivery of aa-tRNA by EF-Tu to the ribosomal A-site, whereas the class II PrAMPs, such as apidaecin 1b and Api137, act during translation termination and inhibit protein synthesis by trapping of release factors on the 70S ribosome following hydrolysis of the nascent polypeptide chain.

Ribosomal protein eL42 contributes to the catalytic activity of the yeast ribosome at the elongation step of translation

The GGQ minidomain of the ribosomal protein eL42 was previously shown to contact the CCA-arm of P-site bound tRNA in human ribosome, indicating a possible involvement of the protein in the catalytic activity. Here, using Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe) cells, we demonstrate that the GGQ minidomain and neighboring region of eL42 is critical for the ribosomal function. Mutant eL42 proteins containing amino acid substitutions within or adjacent to the GGQ minidomain failed to complement the function of wild-type eL42, and expression of the mutant eL42 proteins led to severe growth defects. These results suggest that the mutations in eL42 interfere with the ribosomal function in vivo. Furthermore, we show that some of the mutations associated with the conserved GGQ region lead to reduced activities in the poly(Phe) synthesis and/or in the peptidyl transferase reaction with respect to puromycin, as compared with those of the wild-type ribosomes. A pK value of 6.95 was measured for the side chain of Lys-55/Arg-55, which is considerably less than that of a Lys or Arg residue. Altogether, our findings suggest that eL42 contributes to the 80S ribosome's peptidyl transferase activity by promoting the course of the elongation cycle.

Control of mRNA Translation by Versatile ATP-Driven Machines

Translation is organized in a cycle that requires ribosomal subunits, mRNA, aminoacylated transfer RNAs, and myriad regulatory factors. As soon as translation reaches a stop codon or stall, a termination or surveillance process is launched via the release factors eRF1 or Pelota, respectively. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein ABCE1 interacts with release factors and coordinates the recycling process in Eukarya and Archaea. After splitting, ABCE1 stays with the small ribosomal subunit and emerges as an integral part of translation initiation complexes. In addition, eEF3 and ABCF proteins control translation by binding at the E-site. In this review, we highlight advances in the fundamental role of ABC systems in mRNA translation in view of their collective inner mechanics.

Release of Ubiquitinated and Non-ubiquitinated Nascent Chains from Stalled Mammalian Ribosomal Complexes by ANKZF1 and Ptrh1

The ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) pathway degrades nascent chains (NCs) arising from interrupted translation. First, recycling factors split stalled ribosomes, yielding NC-tRNA/60S ribosome-nascent chain complexes (60S RNCs). 60S RNCs associate with NEMF, which recruits the E3 ubiquitin ligase Listerin that ubiquitinates NCs. The mechanism of subsequent ribosomal release of Ub-NCs remains obscure. We found that, in non-ubiquitinated 60S RNCs and 80S RNCs formed on non-stop mRNAs, tRNA is not firmly fixed in the P site, which allows peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase Ptrh1 to cleave NC-tRNA, suggesting the existence of a pathway involving release of non-ubiquitinated NCs. Association with NEMF and Listerin and ubiquitination of NCs results in accommodation of NC-tRNA, rendering 60S RNCs resistant to Ptrh1 but susceptible to ANKZF1, which induces specific cleavage in the tRNA acceptor arm, releasing proteasome-degradable Ub-NCs linked to four 3'-terminal tRNA nucleotides. We also found that TCF25, a poorly characterized RQC component, ensures preferential formation of the K48-ubiquitin linkage.

Visualization of translation termination intermediates trapped by the Apidaecin 137 peptide during RF3-mediated recycling of RF1

During translation termination in bacteria, the release factors RF1 and RF2 are recycled from the ribosome by RF3. While high-resolution structures of the individual termination factors on the ribosome exist, direct structural insight into how RF3 mediates dissociation of the decoding RFs has been lacking. Here we have used the Apidaecin 137 peptide to trap RF1 together with RF3 on the ribosome and visualize an ensemble of termination intermediates using cryo-electron microscopy. Binding of RF3 to the ribosome induces small subunit (SSU) rotation and swivelling of the head, yielding intermediate states with shifted P-site tRNAs and RF1 conformations. RF3 does not directly eject RF1 from the ribosome, but rather induces full rotation of the SSU that indirectly dislodges RF1 from its binding site. SSU rotation is coupled to the accommodation of the GTPase domain of RF3 on the large subunit (LSU), thereby promoting GTP hydrolysis and dissociation of RF3 from the ribosome.

In bacteria, the process of translation termination is performed by three termination release factors RF1, RF2 and RF3. Here the authors provide detailed structural insights into the mechanism by which RF1 is dissociated from the ribosome by RF3 during termination.

RpbL12 Assists Catalysis by Correctly Positioning the Incoming Aminoacyl-tRNA in the A-Site of E. coli 70S Ribosomes

Introduction:

We have recently demonstrated that Lys-65 of the 62GANK65 motif of E. coli RpbL12 was affinity labeled with a tRNA analogue, resulting in the loss of activity.

Materials and Methods:

In this report, we show that mutations operated at the position of Lys-65 led to an impairment in the activity of the mutant ribosomes, except the K65R or K65H bL12 mutants, suggesting that the only requirement of the reaction catalyzed or facilitated by RpbL12is the positive charge of the side chain of Lys-65. We also demonstrate that Lys-65 did not play any role in the peptidyl transferase reaction with respect to puromycin, but rather assisted the binding of the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site.

Results & Discussions

The protonated, positively charged εNH₃⁺ form of Lys-65 is likely to participate to the binding of aa-tRNA through ionic bonds with phosphate groups, in order to insure the accurate positioning required for the nucleophilic attack of its α-amino group on the carbonyl carbone of peptidyl-tRNA.

Conclusion

This α-NH₂ group is likely to be generated by the unprotonated εNH₂ form of Lys-65 which is capable of withdrawing a proton from the α-NH₃⁺ group of aa-tRNA.

Dynamics of ribosomes and release factors during translation termination in E. coli

Release factors RF1 and RF2 promote hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA during translation termination. The GTPase RF3 promotes recycling of RF1 and RF2. Using single molecule FRET and biochemical assays, we show that ribosome termination complexes that carry two factors, RF1–RF3 or RF2–RF3, are dynamic and fluctuate between non-rotated and rotated states, whereas each factor alone has its distinct signature on ribosome dynamics and conformation. Dissociation of RF1 depends on peptide release and the presence of RF3, whereas RF2 can dissociate spontaneously. RF3 binds in the GTP-bound state and can rapidly dissociate without GTP hydrolysis from termination complex carrying RF1. In the absence of RF1, RF3 is stalled on ribosomes if GTP hydrolysis is blocked. Our data suggest how the assembly of the ribosome–RF1–RF3–GTP complex, peptide release, and ribosome fluctuations promote termination of protein synthesis and recycling of the release factors.

Inside cells, molecular machines called ribosomes make proteins using messenger RNA as a template. However, the template contains more than just the information needed to create the protein. A ‘stop codon’ in the mRNA marks where the ribosome should stop. When this is reached a group of proteins called release factors removes the newly made protein from the ribosome.

Bacteria typically have three types of release factors. RF1 and RF2 recognize the stop codon, and RF3 helps to release RF1 or RF2 from the ribosome so that it can be recycled to produce another protein. It was not fully understood how the release factors interact with the ribosome and how this terminates protein synthesis.

Adio et al. used TIRF microscopy to study individual ribosomes from the commonly studied bacteria species Escherichia coli. This technique allows researchers to monitor movements of the ribosome and record how release factors bind to it. The results of the experiments performed by Adio et al. show that although RF1 and RF2 are very similar to each other, they interact with the ribosome in different ways. In addition, only RF1 relies upon RF3 to release it from the ribosome; RF2 can release itself. RF3 releases RF1 by forcing the ribosome to change shape. RF3 then uses energy produced by the breakdown of a molecule called GTP to help release itself from the ribosome.

Most importantly, the findings presented by Adio et al. highlight that the movements of ribosomes and release factors during termination are only loosely coupled rather than occur in a set order. Other molecular machines are likely to work in a similar way. The results could also help us to understand the molecular basis of several human diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis, that result from ribosomes not recognizing stop codons in the mRNA.

Operative Binding of Class I Release Factors and YaeJ Stabilizes the Ribosome in the Nonrotated State

During translation, the small subunit of the ribosome rotates with respect to the large subunit primarily between two states as mRNA is being translated into a protein. At the termination of bacterial translation, class I release factors (RFs) bind to a stop codon in the A-site and catalyze the release of the peptide chain from the ribosome. Periodically, mRNA is truncated prematurely, and the translating ribosome stalls at the end of the mRNA forming a nonstop complex requiring one of several ribosome rescue factors to intervene. One factor, YaeJ, is structurally homologous with the catalytic region of RFs but differs by binding to the ribosome directly through its C-terminal tail. Structures of the ribosome show that the ribosome adopts the nonrotated state conformation when these factors are bound. However, these studies do not elucidate the influence of binding to cognate or noncognate codons on the dynamics of intersubunit rotation. Here, we investigate the effects of wild-type and mutant forms of RF1, RF2, and YaeJ binding on ribosome intersubunit rotation using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. We show that both RF1 binding and RF2 binding are sufficient to shift the population of posthydrolysis ribosome complexes from primarily the rotated to the nonrotated state only when a cognate stop codon is present in the A-site. Similarly, YaeJ binding stabilizes nonstop ribosomal complexes in the nonrotated state. Along with previous studies, these results are consistent with the idea that directed conformational changes and binding of subsequent factors to the ribosome are requisite for efficient termination and ribosome recycling.

Conformation of methylated GGQ in the Peptidyl Transferase Center during Translation Termination

The universally conserved Gly-Gly-Gln (GGQ) tripeptide in release factors or release factor-like surveillance proteins is required to catalyze the release of nascent peptide in the ribosome. The glutamine of the GGQ is methylated post-translationally at the N⁵ position in vivo; this covalent modification is essential for optimal cell growth and efficient translation termination. However, the precise conformation of the methylated-GGQ tripeptide in the ribosome remains unknown. Using cryoEM and X-ray crystallography, we report the conformation of methylated-GGQ in the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome during canonical translational termination and co-translation quality control. It has been suggested that the GGQ motif arose independently through convergent evolution among otherwise unrelated proteins that catalyze peptide release. The requirement for this tripeptide in the highly conserved peptidyl transferase center suggests that the conformation reported here is likely shared during termination of protein synthesis in all domains of life.

Uniformity of Peptide Release Is Maintained by Methylation of Release Factors

Termination of protein synthesis on the ribosome is catalyzed by release factors (RFs), which share a conserved glycine-glycine-glutamine (GGQ) motif. The glutamine residue is methylated in vivo, but a mechanistic understanding of its contribution to hydrolysis is lacking. Here, we show that the modification, apart from increasing the overall rate of termination on all dipeptides, substantially increases the rate of peptide release on a subset of amino acids. In the presence of unmethylated RFs, we measure rates of hydrolysis that are exceptionally slow on proline and glycine residues and approximately two orders of magnitude faster in the presence of the methylated factors. Structures of 70S ribosomes bound to methylated RF1 and RF2 reveal that the glutamine side-chain methylation packs against 23S rRNA nucleotide 2451, stabilizing the GGQ motif and placing the side-chain amide of the glutamine toward tRNA. These data provide a framework for understanding how release factor modifications impact termination.

High-Efficiency "-1" and "-2" Ribosomal Frameshiftings Revealed by Force Spectroscopy

Ribosomal frameshifting is a rare but ubiquitous process that is being studied extensively. Meanwhile, frameshifting motifs without any secondary mRNA structures were identified but rarely studied experimentally. We report unambiguous observation of highly efficient “–1” and “–2” frameshiftings on a GA₇G slippery mRNA without the downstream secondary structure, using force-induced remnant magnetization spectroscopy combined with unique probing schemes. The result represents the first experimental evidence of multiple frameshifting steps. It is also one of the rare reports of the “–2” frameshifting. Our assay removed the ambiguity of transcriptional slippage involvement in other frameshifting assays. Two significant insights for the frameshifting mechanism were revealed. First, EF-G·GTP is indispensable to frameshifting. Although EFG·GDPCP has been shown to prompt translocation before, we found that it could not induce frameshifting. This implies that the GTP hydrolysis is responsible for the codon–anticodon re-pairing in frameshifting, which corroborates our previous mechanical force measurement of EF-G·GTP. Second, translation in all three reading frames of the slippery sequence can be induced by the corresponding in-frame aminoacyl tRNAs. Although A-site tRNA is known to affect the partition between “0” and “–1” frameshifting, it has not been reported that all three reading frames can be translated by their corresponding tRNAs. The in vitro results were confirmed by toe-printing assay and protein sequencing.

Ribosome rearrangements at the onset of translational bypassing

Bypassing is a recoding event that leads to the translation of two distal open reading frames into a single polypeptide chain. We present the structure of a translating ribosome stalled at the bypassing take-off site of gene 60 of bacteriophage T4. The nascent peptide in the exit tunnel anchors the P-site peptidyl-tRNA^Gly to the ribosome and locks an inactive conformation of the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). The mRNA forms a short dynamic hairpin in the decoding site. The ribosomal subunits adopt a rolling conformation in which the rotation of the small subunit around its long axis causes the opening of the A-site region. Together, PTC conformation and mRNA structure safeguard against premature termination and read-through of the stop codon and reconfigure the ribosome to a state poised for take-off and sliding along the noncoding mRNA gap.

Mechanistic Insights Into Catalytic RNA-Protein Complexes Involved in Translation of the Genetic Code

The contemporary world is an "RNA-protein world" rather than a "protein world" and tracing its evolutionary origins is of great interest and importance. The different RNAs that function in close collaboration with proteins are involved in several key physiological processes, including catalysis. Ribosome-the complex megadalton cellular machinery that translates genetic information encoded in nucleotide sequence to amino acid sequence-epitomizes such an association between RNA and protein. RNAs that can catalyze biochemical reactions are known as ribozymes. They usually employ general acid-base catalytic mechanism, often involving the 2'-OH of RNA that activates and/or stabilizes a nucleophile during the reaction pathway. The protein component of such RNA-protein complexes (RNPCs) mostly serves as a scaffold which provides an environment conducive for the RNA to function, or as a mediator for other interacting partners. In this review, we describe those RNPCs that are involved at different stages of protein biosynthesis and in which RNA performs the catalytic function; the focus of the account is on highlighting mechanistic aspects of these complexes. We also provide a perspective on such associations in the context of proofreading during translation of the genetic code. The latter aspect is not much appreciated and recent works suggest that this is an avenue worth exploring, since an understanding of the subject can provide useful insights into how RNAs collaborate with proteins to ensure fidelity during these essential cellular processes. It may also aid in comprehending evolutionary aspects of such associations.

A Functional Role for the Monomethylated Gln-51 and Lys-53 Residues of the 49GGQTK53 Motif of eL42 from Human 80S Ribosomes

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that the eukaryote-specific ribosomal protein eL42 of the human 80S ribosome contains seven monomethylated residues, among which are the Gln-51 and Lys-53 residues contained in the 47GFGGQTK53 sequence conserved in all eukaryotic 80S ribosomes. This sequence contains the methylated and universally conserved GGQ motif common for all class-1 translation termination factors responsible for stop codon recognition and for triggering the hydrolysis of the P site-bound peptidyl-tRNA. We have also recently reported a model of ribosomal ternary eL42-tRNA-eRF1 complex where specific regions of all three macromolecules (the comparably flexible GGQ domains of eRF1 and eL42 and the CCA-arm of tRNA) are involved in interactions.

METHOD

Here, we have studied the interactions between recombinant eL42 and eRF1 proteins and the tRNA substrate by means of the Biacore assay, using the wild-type eL42 protein, the eL42-Δ(GGQTK) mutant (the eL42 protein whose GGQTK motif has been deleted), the single Q51E and K53Q mutants (eL42-Q51E and eL42-K53Q, respectively), as well as the double Q51A/K53A mutant (eL42-Q51A/K53A).

RESULTS

Our results show that the monomethylated Gln-51 and Lys-53 residues contained in the 47GFGGQTK53 sequence of eL42 and the monomethylated GGQ motif of eRF1 represents the sites of interaction between these two proteins through hydrophobic contacts between methyl groups. We also demonstrate that the interactions between eL42 and tRNA or 28S rRNA are characterized by strong binding affinities (KD values in the nanomolar or picomolar range, respectively) which argue for specific interactions. Strong interactions between eL42 and tRNA are likely to be responsible for the decrease in the poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis activity of human 80S or E. coli 70S ribosomes in the presence of added human recombinant eL42. It is proposed that the decrease of the activity of the ribosome is caused by the sequestration of the substrate Phe-tRNAPhe by the added eL42 protein.

CONCLUSION

Interactions between the monomethylated Gln-51 and Lys-53 residues of the 49GGQTK53 motif of the human eL42 protein and the methylated GGQ motif of eRF1 are likely to play a functional role on translating human 80S ribosomes.

The Shine-Dalgarno sequence of riboswitch-regulated single mRNAs shows ligand-dependent accessibility bursts

In response to intracellular signals in Gram-negative bacteria, translational riboswitches—commonly embedded in messenger RNAs (mRNAs)—regulate gene expression through inhibition of translation initiation. It is generally thought that this regulation originates from occlusion of the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence upon ligand binding; however, little direct evidence exists. Here we develop Single Molecule Kinetic Analysis of RNA Transient Structure (SiM-KARTS) to investigate the ligand-dependent accessibility of the SD sequence of an mRNA hosting the 7-aminomethyl-7-deazaguanine (preQ₁)-sensing riboswitch. Spike train analysis reveals that individual mRNA molecules alternate between two conformational states, distinguished by ‘bursts' of probe binding associated with increased SD sequence accessibility. Addition of preQ₁ decreases the lifetime of the SD's high-accessibility (bursting) state and prolongs the time between bursts. In addition, ligand-jump experiments reveal imperfect riboswitching of single mRNA molecules. Such complex ligand sensing by individual mRNA molecules rationalizes the nuanced ligand response observed during bulk mRNA translation.

In response to intracellular signals, bacterial translational riboswitches embedded in mRNAs can regulate gene expression through inhibition of translation initiation. Here, the authors describe SiM-KARTS, a novel approach for detecting changes in the structure of single RNA molecules in response to a ligand.

Peptide release promoted by methylated RF2 and ArfA in nonstop translation is achieved by an induced-fit mechanism

Here we report that the specificity of peptide release in the ribosome on a nonstop mRNA by ArfA and RF2 is achieved by an induced-fit mechanism. Using RF2 that is methylated on the glutamine of its GGQ motif (RF2(m)), we show that methylation substantially increases the rate of ArfA/RF2-catalyzed peptide release on a nonstop mRNA that does not occupy the ribosomal A site, but has only a modest effect on k(cat) by the same proteins on longer nonstop mRNAs occupying the A site of the mRNA channel in the ribosome. Our data suggest that enhancement in the kcat of peptide release by ArfA and RF2 under the cognate decoding condition is the result of favorable conformational changes in the nonstop complex. We demonstrate a shared mechanism between canonical and nonstop termination, supported by similarities in the kinetic mechanisms in antibiotic inhibition and methylation-correlated enhancement in the rate of peptide release. Despite these similarities, our data suggest that nonstop termination differs from canonical pathway in the downstream event of recycling.

On the pH dependence of class-1 RF-dependent termination of mRNA translation

We have studied the pH dependence of the rate of termination of bacterial protein synthesis catalyzed by a class-1 release factor (RF1 or RF2). We used a classical quench-flow technique and a newly developed stopped-flow technique that relies on the use of fluorescently labeled peptides. We found the termination rate to increase with increasing pH and, eventually, to saturate at about 70 s(-1) with an apparent pKa value of about 7.6. From our data, we suggest that class-1 RF termination is rate limited by the chemistry of ester bond hydrolysis at low pH and by a stop-codon-dependent and pH-independent conformational change of RFs at high pH. We propose that RF-dependent termination depends on the participation of a hydroxide ion rather than a water molecule in the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the P-site tRNA and its peptide chain. We provide a simple explanation for why the rate of termination saturated at high pH in our experiments but not in those of others.

Overcoming stalled translation in human mitochondria

Protein synthesis is central to life and maintaining a highly accurate and efficient mechanism is essential. What happens when a translating ribosome stalls on a messenger RNA? Many highly intricate processes have been documented in the cytosol of numerous species, but how does organellar protein synthesis resolve this stalling issue? Mammalian mitochondria synthesize just thirteen highly hydrophobic polypeptides. These proteins are all integral components of the machinery that couples oxidative phosphorylation. Consequently, it is essential that stalled mitochondrial ribosomes can be efficiently recycled. To date, there is no evidence to support any particular molecular mechanism to resolve this problem. However, here we discuss the observation that there are four predicted members of the mitochondrial translation release factor family and that only one member, mtRF1a, is necessary to terminate the translation of all thirteen open reading frames in the mitochondrion. Could the other members be involved in the process of recycling stalled mitochondrial ribosomes?

RF3:GTP promotes rapid dissociation of the class 1 termination factor

Translation termination is promoted by class 1 and class 2 release factors in all domains of life. While the role of the bacterial class 1 factors, RF1 and RF2, in translation termination is well understood, the precise contribution of the bacterial class 2 release factor, RF3, to this process remains less clear. Here, we use a combination of binding assays and pre-steady state kinetics to provide a kinetic and thermodynamic framework for understanding the role of the translational GTPase RF3 in bacterial translation termination. First, we find that GDP and GTP have similar affinities for RF3 and that, on average, the t1/2 for nucleotide dissociation from the protein is 1-2 min. We further show that RF3:GDPNP, but not RF3:GDP, tightly associates with the ribosome pre- and post-termination complexes. Finally, we use stopped-flow fluorescence to demonstrate that RF3:GTP enhances RF1 dissociation rates by over 500-fold, providing the first direct observation of this step. Importantly, catalytically inactive variants of RF1 are not rapidly dissociated from the ribosome by RF3:GTP, arguing that a rotated state of the ribosome must be sampled for this step to efficiently occur. Together, these data define a more precise role for RF3 in translation termination and provide insights into the function of this family of translational GTPases.

Timing of GTP binding and hydrolysis by translation termination factor RF3

Protein synthesis in bacteria is terminated by release factors 1 or 2 (RF1/2), which, on recognition of a stop codon in the decoding site on the ribosome, promote the hydrolytic release of the polypeptide from the transfer RNA (tRNA). Subsequently, the dissociation of RF1/2 is accelerated by RF3, a guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) that hydrolyzes GTP during the process. Here we show that—in contrast to a previous report—RF3 binds GTP and guanosine diphosphate (GDP) with comparable affinities. Furthermore, we find that RF3–GTP binds to the ribosome and hydrolyzes GTP independent of whether the P site contains peptidyl-tRNA (pre-termination state) or deacylated tRNA (post-termination state). RF3–GDP in either pre- or post-termination complexes readily exchanges GDP for GTP, and the exchange is accelerated when RF2 is present on the ribosome. Peptide release results in the stabilization of the RF3–GTP–ribosome complex, presumably due to the formation of the hybrid/rotated state of the ribosome, thereby promoting the dissociation of RF1/2. GTP hydrolysis by RF3 is virtually independent of the functional state of the ribosome and the presence of RF2, suggesting that RF3 acts as an unregulated ribosome-activated switch governed by its internal GTPase clock.

Crystal structure of the 70S ribosome bound with the Q253P mutant form of release factor RF2

Bacterial translation termination is mediated by release factors RF1 and RF2, which recognize stop codons and catalyze hydrolysis of the peptidyl-tRNA ester bond. The catalytic mechanism has been debated. We proposed that the backbone amide NH group, rather than the side chain, of the glutamine of the universally conserved GGQ motif participates in catalysis by H-bonding to the tetrahedral transition-state intermediate and by product stabilization. This was supported by complete loss of RF1 catalytic activity when glutamine is replaced by proline, the only residue that lacks a backbone NH group. Here, we present the 3.4 Å crystal structure of the ribosome complex containing the RF2 Q253P mutant and find that its fold, including the GGP sequence, is virtually identical to that of wild-type RF2. This rules out proline-induced misfolding and further supports the proposal that catalytic activity requires interaction of the Gln-253 backbone amide with the 3' end of peptidyl-tRNA.

The ribosome as a versatile catalyst: reactions at the peptidyl transferase center

In all contemporary organisms, the active site of the ribosome--the peptidyl transferase center--catalyzes two distinct reactions, peptide bond formation between peptidyl-tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA as well as the hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA with the help of a release factor. However, when provided with appropriate substrates, ribosomes can also catalyze a broad range of other chemical reaction, which provides the basis for orthogonal translation and synthesis of alloproteins from unnatural building blocks. Advances in understanding the mechanisms of the two ubiquitous reactions, the peptide bond formation and peptide release, provide insights into the versatility of the active site of the ribosome. Release factors 1 and 2 and elongation factor P are auxiliary factors that augment the intrinsic catalytic activity of the ribosome in special cases.

Nascent peptides that block protein synthesis in bacteria

Although the ribosome is a very general catalyst, it cannot synthesize all protein sequences equally well. For example, ribosomes stall on the secretion monitor (SecM) leader peptide to regulate expression of a downstream gene. Using a genetic selection in Escherichia coli, we identified additional nascent peptide motifs that stall ribosomes. Kinetic studies show that some nascent peptides dramatically inhibit rates of peptide release by release factors. We find that residues upstream of the minimal stalling motif can either enhance or suppress this effect. In other stalling motifs, peptidyl transfer to certain aminoacyl-tRNAs is inhibited. In particular, three consecutive Pro codons pose a challenge for elongating ribosomes. The translation factor elongation factor P, which alleviates pausing at polyproline sequences, has little or no effect on other stalling peptides. The motifs that we identified are underrepresented in bacterial proteomes and show evidence of stalling on endogenous E. coli proteins.

A Role for the 2' OH of peptidyl-tRNA substrate in peptide release on the ribosome revealed through RF-mediated rescue

The 2' OH of the peptidyl-tRNA substrate is thought to be important for catalysis of both peptide bond formation and peptide release in the ribosomal active site. The release reaction also specifically depends on a release factor protein (RF) to hydrolyze the ester linkage of the peptidyl-tRNA upon recognition of stop codons in the A site. Here, we demonstrate that certain amino acid substitutions (in particular those containing hydroxyl or thiol groups) in the conserved GGQ glutamine of release factor RF1 can rescue defects in the release reaction associated with peptidyl-tRNA substrates lacking a 2' OH. We explored this rescue effect through biochemical and computational approaches that support a model where the 2' OH of the P-site substrate is critical for orienting the nucleophile in a hydrogen-bonding network productive for catalysis.

Crystal structures of 70S ribosomes bound to release factors RF1, RF2 and RF3

Termination is a crucial step in translation, most notably because premature termination can lead to toxic truncated polypeptides. Most interesting is the fact that stop codons are read by a completely different mechanism from that of sense codons. In recent years, rapid progress has been made in the structural biology of complexes of bacterial ribosomes bound to translation termination factors, much of which has been discussed in earlier reviews [1-5]. Here, we present a brief overview of the structures of bacterial translation termination complexes. The first part summarizes what has been learned from crystal structures of complexes containing the class I release factors RF1 and RF2. In the second part, we discuss the results and implications of two recent X-ray structures of complexes of ribosomes bound to the translational GTPase RF3. These structures have provided many insights and a number of surprises. While structures alone do not tell us how these complicated molecular assemblies work, is it nevertheless clear that it will not be possible to understand their mechanisms without detailed structural information.

Termination and post-termination events in eukaryotic translation

Translation termination in eukaryotes occurs in response to a stop codon in the ribosomal A-site and requires two release factors (RFs), eRF1 and eRF3, which bind to the A-site as an eRF1/eRF3/GTP complex with eRF1 responsible for codon recognition. After GTP hydrolysis by eRF3, eRF1 triggers hydrolysis of the polypeptidyl-tRNA, releasing the completed protein product. This leaves an 80S ribosome still bound to the mRNA, with deacylated tRNA in its P-site and at least eRF1 in its A-site, which needs to be disassembled and released from the mRNA to allow further rounds of translation. The first step in recycling is dissociation of the 60S ribosomal subunit, leaving a 40S/deacylated tRNA complex bound to the mRNA. This is mediated by ABCE1, which is a somewhat unusual member of the ATP-binding cassette family of proteins with no membrane-spanning domain but two essential iron-sulfur clusters. Two distinct pathways have been identified for subsequent ejection of the deacylated tRNA followed by dissociation of the 40S subunit from the mRNA, one executed by a subset of the canonical initiation factors (which therefore starts the process of preparing the 40S subunit for the next round of translation) and the other by Ligatin or homologous proteins. However, although this is the normal sequence of events, there are exceptions where the termination reaction is followed by reinitiation on the same mRNA (usually) at a site downstream of the stop codon. The overwhelming majority of such reinitiation events occur when the 5'-proximal open reading frame (ORF) is short and can result in significant regulation of translation of the protein-coding ORF, but there are also rare examples, mainly bicistronic viral RNAs, of reinitiation after a long ORF. Here, we review our current understanding of the mechanisms of termination, ribosome recycling, and reinitiation after translation of short and long ORFs.

Methylation of class I translation termination factors: structural and functional aspects

During protein synthesis, release of polypeptide from the ribosome occurs when an in frame termination codon is encountered. Contrary to sense codons, which are decoded by tRNAs, stop codons present in the A-site are recognized by proteins named class I release factors, leading to the release of newly synthesized proteins. Structures of these factors bound to termination ribosomal complexes have recently been obtained, and lead to a better understanding of stop codon recognition and its coordination with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis in bacteria. Release factors contain a universally conserved GGQ motif which interacts with the peptidyl-transferase centre to allow peptide release. The Gln side chain from this motif is methylated, a feature conserved from bacteria to man, suggesting an important biological role. However, methylation is catalysed by completely unrelated enzymes. The function of this motif and its post-translational modification will be discussed in the context of recent structural and functional studies.

Quality control of mRNA decoding on the bacterial ribosome

The ribosome is a major player in providing accurate gene expression in the cell. The fidelity of substrate selection is tightly controlled throughout the translation process, including the initiation, elongation, and termination phases. Although each phase of translation involves different players, that is, translation factors and tRNAs, the general principles of selection appear surprisingly similar for very different substrates. At essentially every step of translation, differences in complex stabilities as well as induced fit are sources of selectivity. A view starts to emerge of how the ribosome uses local and global conformational switches to govern induced-fit mechanisms that ensure fidelity. This review describes the mechanisms of tRNA and mRNA selection at all phases of protein synthesis in bacteria.

Structural aspects of translation termination on the ribosome

Translation of genetic information encoded in messenger RNAs into polypeptide sequences is carried out by ribosomes in all organisms. When a full protein is synthesized, a stop codon positioned in the ribosomal A site signals termination of translation and protein release. Translation termination depends on class I release factors. Recently, atomic-resolution crystal structures were determined for bacterial 70S ribosome termination complexes bound with release factors RF1 or RF2. In combination with recent biochemical studies, the structures resolve long-standing questions about translation termination. They bring insights into the mechanisms of recognition of all three stop codons, peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, and coordination of stop-codon recognition with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. In this review, the structural aspects of these mechanisms are discussed.

Different substrate-dependent transition states in the active site of the ribosome

The active site of the ribosome, the peptidyl transferase centre, catalyses two reactions, namely, peptide bond formation between peptidyl-tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA as well as the release-factor-dependent hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA. Unlike peptide bond formation, peptide release is strongly impaired by mutations of nucleotides within the active site, in particular by base exchanges at position A2602 (refs 1, 2). The 2'-OH group of A76 of the peptidyl-tRNA substrate seems to have a key role in peptide release. According to computational analysis, the 2'-OH may take part in a concerted 'proton shuttle' by which the leaving group is protonated, in analogy to similar current models of peptide bond formation. Here we report kinetic solvent isotope effects and proton inventories (reaction rates measured in buffers with increasing content of deuterated water, D(2)O) of the two reactions catalysed by the active site of the Escherichia coli ribosome. The transition state of the release factor 2 (RF2)-dependent hydrolysis reaction is characterized by the rate-limiting formation of a single strong hydrogen bond. This finding argues against a concerted proton shuttle in the transition state of the hydrolysis reaction. In comparison, the proton inventory for peptide bond formation indicates the rate-limiting formation of three hydrogen bonds with about equal contributions, consistent with a concerted eight-membered proton shuttle in the transition state. Thus, the ribosome supports different rate-limiting transition states for the two reactions that take place in the peptidyl transferase centre.

Mutations at the accommodation gate of the ribosome impair RF2-dependent translation termination

During protein synthesis, aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) and release factors 1 and 2 (RF1 and RF2) have to bind at the catalytic center of the ribosome on the 50S subunit where they take part in peptide bond formation or peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, respectively. Computer simulations of aa-tRNA movement into the catalytic site (accommodation) suggested that three nucleotides of 23S rRNA, U2492, C2556, and C2573, form a "gate" at which aa-tRNA movement into the A site is retarded. Here we examined the role of nucleotides C2573 of 23S rRNA, a part of the putative accommodation gate, and of the neighboring A2572 for aa-tRNA binding followed by peptide bond formation and for the RF2-dependent peptide release. Mutations at the two positions did not affect aa-tRNA accommodation, peptide bond formation, or the fidelity of aa-tRNA selection, but impaired RF2-catalyzed peptide release. The data suggest that the ribosome is a robust machine that allows rapid aa-tRNA accommodation despite the defects at the accommodation gate. In comparison, peptide release by RF2 appears more sensitive to these mutations, due to slower accommodation of the factor or effects on RF2 positioning in the A site.

Ribosome structure and dynamics during translocation and termination

Protein biosynthesis, or translation, occurs on the ribosome, a large RNA-protein assembly universally conserved in all forms of life. Over the last decade, structures of the small and large ribosomal subunits and of the intact ribosome have begun to reveal the molecular details of how the ribosome works. Both cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography continue to provide fresh insights into the mechanism of translation. In this review, we describe the most recent structural models of the bacterial ribosome that shed light on the movement of messenger RNA and transfer RNA on the ribosome after each peptide bond is formed, a process termed translocation. We also discuss recent structures that reveal the molecular basis for stop codon recognition during translation termination. Finally, we review recent advances in understanding how bacteria handle errors in both translocation and termination.

Recognition of the amber UAG stop codon by release factor RF1

We report the crystal structure of a termination complex containing release factor RF1 bound to the 70S ribosome in response to an amber (UAG) codon at 3.6-A resolution. The amber codon is recognized in the 30S subunit-decoding centre directly by conserved elements of domain 2 of RF1, including T186 of the PVT motif. Together with earlier structures, the mechanisms of recognition of all three stop codons by release factors RF1 and RF2 can now be described. Our structure confirms that the backbone amide of Q230 of the universally conserved GGQ motif is positioned to contribute directly to the catalysis of the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis reaction through stabilization of the leaving group and/or transition state. We also observe synthetic-negative interactions between mutations in the switch loop of RF1 and in helix 69 of 23S rRNA, revealing that these structural features interact functionally in the termination process. These findings are consistent with our proposal that structural rearrangements of RF1 and RF2 are critical to accurate translation termination.