King of the castle: competition between repressors and activators on the Mcm1 platform

A new transcription factor for mitosis: in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the RFX transcription factor Sak1 works with forkhead factors to regulate mitotic expression

Mitotic genes are one of the most strongly oscillating groups of genes in the eukaryotic cell cycle. Understanding the regulation of mitotic gene expression is a key issue in cell cycle control but is poorly understood in most organisms. Here, we find a new mitotic transcription factor, Sak1, in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Sak1 belongs to the RFX family of transcription factors, which have not previously been connected to cell cycle control. Sak1 binds upstream of mitotic genes in close proximity to Fkh2, a forkhead transcription factor previously implicated in regulation of mitotic genes. We show that Sak1 is the major activator of mitotic gene expression and also confirm the role of Fkh2 as the opposing repressor. Sep1, another forkhead transcription factor, is an activator for a small subset of mitotic genes involved in septation. From yeasts to humans, forkhead transcription factors are involved in mitotic gene expression and it will be interesting to see whether RFX transcription factors may also be involved in other organisms.

The MuvB complex sequentially recruits B-Myb and FoxM1 to promote mitotic gene expression

Cell cycle progression is dependent on two major waves of gene expression. Early cell cycle gene expression occurs during G1/S to generate factors required for DNA replication, while late cell cycle gene expression begins during G2 to prepare for mitosis. Here we demonstrate that the MuvB complex-comprised of LIN9, LIN37, LIN52, LIN54, and RBBP4-serves an essential role in three distinct transcription complexes to regulate cell cycle gene expression. The MuvB complex, together with the Rb-like protein p130, E2F4, and DP1, forms the DREAM complex during quiescence and represses expression of both early and late genes. Upon cell cycle entry, the MuvB complex dissociates from p130/DREAM, binds to B-Myb, and reassociates with the promoters of late genes during S phase. MuvB and B-Myb are required for the subsequent recruitment of FoxM1 to late gene promoters during G2. The MuvB complex remains bound to FoxM1 during peak late cell cycle gene expression, while B-Myb binding is lost when it undergoes phosphorylation-dependent, proteasome-mediated degradation during late S phase. Our results reveal a novel role for the MuvB complex in recruiting B-Myb and FoxM1 to promote late cell cycle gene expression and in regulating cell cycle gene expression from quiescence through mitosis.

Repression of meiotic genes by antisense transcription and by Fkh2 transcription factor in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

In S. pombe, about 5% of genes are meiosis-specific and accumulate little or no mRNA during vegetative growth. Here we use Affymetrix tiling arrays to characterize transcripts in vegetative and meiotic cells. In vegetative cells, many meiotic genes, especially those induced in mid-meiosis, have abundant antisense transcripts. Disruption of the antisense transcription of three of these mid-meiotic genes allowed vegetative sense transcription. These results suggest that antisense transcription represses sense transcription of meiotic genes in vegetative cells. Although the mechanism(s) of antisense mediated transcription repression need to be further explored, our data indicates that RNAi machinery is not required for repression. Previously, we and others used non-strand specific methods to study splicing regulation of meiotic genes and concluded that 28 mid-meiotic genes are spliced only in meiosis. We now demonstrate that the "unspliced" signal in vegetative cells comes from the antisense RNA, not from unspliced sense RNA, and we argue against the idea that splicing regulates these mid-meiotic genes. Most of these mid-meiotic genes are induced in mid-meiosis by the forkhead transcription factor Mei4. Interestingly, deletion of a different forkhead transcription factor, Fkh2, allows low levels of sense expression of some mid-meiotic genes in vegetative cells. We propose that vegetative expression of mid-meiotic genes is repressed at least two independent ways: antisense transcription and Fkh2 repression.

Ligand binding domain mutations of the glucocorticoid receptor selectively modify the effects with, but not binding of, cofactors

We previously reported that several point mutations in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) marginally affect the binding affinity of the synthetic glucocorticoids dexamethasone (Dex) and deacylcortivazol (DAC). However, these mutations dramatically alter the efficacy (A(max)) and potency (EC(50)) of agonists, along with the partial agonist activity (PAA) of the antisteroid Dex-mesylate (DM), for gene induction and repression in a steroid-dependent manner. This was proposed to result, in part, from altered protein-protein interactions in the complex of GR with the coactivator TIF2 despite normal TIF2 binding. To explore the generality of this phenomenon, we now ask whether these mutations also affect the transactivation properties, but not binding, of other GR-bound factors. We find that an elevated concentration of GR, to probe unidentified cofactors, or of the comodulator Ubc9 does not reverse the effects of GR LBD mutations that increase the EC(50) and lower the PAA with the GREtkLUC reporter in both CV-1 and U2OS cells. This behavior is more dramatic with Ubc9 and the isolated GR LBD fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain, despite normal binding of Ubc9 to the mutant GRs. Similar effects, albeit gene, steroid, and transcriptional property-specific, are seen with full-length GRs and three endogenous genes in U2OS cells. Thus, changes in simple steady-state binding capacities of mutant receptors for factors cannot account for the modified transcriptional properties. In all cases, the nuclear translocation of Dex- and DAC-bound wild-type and mutant receptors is the same. These results are consistent with the earlier results with TIF2 and support the hypothesis that small changes in the GR LBD can alter the activities of the bound cofactor without modifying cofactor binding. We propose that this separation of binding and the modulation of transactivation parameters occurs for a wide variety of GR-associated cofactors.