Study of interfacial properties of water + methane + oil three-phase systems by a simple molecular simulation protocol

Molecular modeling of interfacial properties of the hydrogen + water + decane mixture in three-phase equilibrium

The understanding of interfacial phenomena between H2 and geofluids is of great importance for underground H2 storage, but requires further study. We report the first investigation on the three-phase fluid mixture containing H2, H2O, and n-C10H22. Molecular dynamics simulation and PC-SAFT density gradient theory are employed to estimate the interfacial properties under various conditions (temperature ranges from 298 to 373 K and pressure is up to around 100 MPa). Our results demonstrate that interfacial tensions (IFTs) of the H2-H2O interface in the H2 + H2O + C10H22 three-phase mixture are smaller than IFTs in the H2 + H2O two-phase mixture. This decrement of IFT can be attributed to C10H22 adsorption in the interface. Importantly, H2 accumulates in the H2O-C10H22 interface in the three-phase systems, which leads to weaker increments of IFT with increasing pressure compared to IFTs in the water + C10H22 two-phase mixture. In addition, the IFTs of the H2-C10H22 interface are hardly influenced by H2O due to the limited amount of H2O dissolved in nonaqueous phases. Nevertheless, positive surface excesses of H2O are seen in the H2-C10H22 interfacial region. Furthermore, the values of the spreading coefficient are mostly negative revealing the presence of the three-phase contact for the H2 + H2O + C10H22 mixture under studied conditions.

Molecular insights into fluid-solid interfacial tensions in water + gas + solid systems at various temperatures and pressures

The fluid-solid interfacial tension is of great importance to many applications including the geological storage of greenhouse gases and enhancing the recovery of geo-resources, but it is rarely studied. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations are conducted to calculate fluid-solid interfacial properties in H2O + gas (H2, N2, CH4, and CO2) + rigid solid three-phase systems at various temperatures (298-403 K), pressures (0-100 MPa), and wettabilities (hydrophilic, neutral, and hydrophobic). Our results on the H2O + solid system show that vapor-solid interfacial tension should not be ignored in cases where the fluid-solid interaction energy is strong or the contact angle is close to 90°. As the temperature rises, the magnitude of H2O's liquid-solid interfacial tension declines because the oscillation of the interfacial density/pressure profile weakens at high temperatures. However, the magnitude of H2O vapor-solid interfacial tension is enhanced with temperature due to the stronger adsorption of H2O. Moreover, the H2O-solid interfacial tension in H2O + gas (H2 or N2) + solid systems is weakly dependent on pressure, while the pressure effects on H2O-solid interfacial tensions in systems with CH4 or CO2 are significant. We show that the assumption of pressure independent H2O-solid interfacial tensions should be cautiously applied to Neumann's method for systems containing non-hydrophilic surfaces with strong gas-solid interaction. Meanwhile, the magnitude of gas-solid interfacial tension increases with pressure and gas-solid interaction. High temperatures generally decrease the magnitude of gas-solid interfacial tensions. Further, we found that the increment of contact angle due to the presence of gases follows this order: H2 < N2 < CH4 < CO2.

Interfacial Properties of H2O+CO2+Oil Three-Phase Systems: A Density Gradient Theory Study

The interfacial property of H2O+CO2+oil three-phase systems is crucial for CO2 flooding and sequestration processes but was not well understood. Density gradient theory coupled with PC-SAFT equation of state was applied to investigate the interfacial tension (IFT) of H2O+CO2+oil (hexane, cyclohexane, and benzene) systems under three-phase conditions (temperature in the range of 323–423 K and pressure in the range of 1–10 MPa). The IFTs of the aqueous phase+vapor phase in H2O+CO2+oil three-phase systems were smaller than the IFTs in H2O+CO2 two-phase systems, which could be explained by enrichment of oil in the interfacial region. The difference between IFTs of aqueous phase+vapor phase in the three-phase system and IFTs in H2O+CO2 two-phase system was largest in the benzene case and smallest in the cyclohexane case due to different degrees of oil enrichment in the interface. Meanwhile, CO2 enrichment was observed in the interfacial region of the aqueous phase+oil-rich phase, which led to the reduction of IFT with increasing pressure while different pressure effects were observed in the H2O+oil two-phase systems. The effect of CO2 on the IFTs of aqueous phase+benzene-rich phase interface was small in contrast to that on the IFTs of aqueous phase+alkane (hexane or cyclohexane)-rich phase interface. H2O had little effect on the interfacial properties of the oil-rich phase+vapor phase due to the low H2O solubilities in the oil and vapor phase. Further, the spreading coefficients of H2O+CO2 in the presence of different oil followed this sequence: benzene > hexane > cyclohexane.