Fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast

Hippo pathway effectors YAP, TAZ and TEAD are associated with EMT master regulators ZEB, Snail and with aggressive phenotype in phyllodes breast tumors

BACKGROUND

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms that tend to recur locally and may have metastatic potential. Their pathogenesis is poorly understood. Hippo signaling pathway plays an essential role in organ size control, tumor suppression, tissue regeneration and stem cell self-renewal. Hippo signaling dysfunction has been implicated in cancer. Recent evidence suggests that there is cross-talk between the Hippo signaling key proteins YAP/TAZ and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) master regulators Snail and ZEB. In this study we aimed to investigate the expression of Hippo signaling pathway components and EMT regulators in PTs, in relation to tumor grade.

METHODS

Expression of Hippo signaling effector proteins YAP, TAZ and their DNA binding partner TEAD was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 86 human phyllodes breast tumors (45 benign, 21 borderline, 20 malignant), in comparison with tumor grade and with the expression of EMT-related transcription factors ZEB and Snail.

RESULTS

Nuclear immunopositivity for YAP, TAZ and TEAD was detected in both stromal and epithelial cells in PTs and was significantly higher in high grade tumors. Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between the expression of YAP, TAZ, TEAD and the expression of ZEB and SNAIL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results originally implicate Hippo signaling pathway in PTs pathogenesis and suggest that an interaction between Hippo signaling key components and EMT regulators may promote the malignant features of PTs.

Imaging and Management of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) are among the most common breast masses encountered by breast radiologists and pathologists. They encompass a spectrum of benign and malignant lesions, including fibroadenomas (FAs) and phyllodes tumors (PTs). FAs are typically seen in young premenopausal women, with a peak incidence at 20-30 years of age, and have imaging features of oval circumscribed hypoechoic masses. Although some FA variants are especially sensitive to hormonal influences and can exhibit rapid growth (eg, juvenile FA and lactational adenomas), most simple FAs are slow growing and involute after menopause. PTs can be benign, borderline, or malignant and are more common in older women aged 40-50 years. PTs usually manifest as enlarging palpable masses and are associated with a larger size and sometimes with an irregular shape at imaging compared with FAs. Although FA and FA variants are typically managed conservatively unless large and symptomatic, PTs are surgically excised because of the risk of undersampling at percutaneous biopsy and the malignant potential of borderline and malignant PTs. As a result of the overlap in imaging and histologic appearances, FELs can present a diagnostic challenge for the radiologist and pathologist. Radiologists can facilitate accurate diagnosis by supplying adequate tissue sampling and including critical information for the pathologist at the time of biopsy. Understanding the spectrum of FELs can facilitate and guide appropriate radiologic-pathologic correlation and timely diagnosis and management of PTs. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Pitfalls and controversies in pathology impacting breast cancer management

Introduction: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, at morphological, molecular, and clinical levels and this has significant implications for the diagnosis and management of the disease. The introduction of breast screening, and the use of small tissue sampling for diagnosis, the recognition of new morphological and molecular subtypes, and the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapies have created challenges in pathological diagnosis and classification.Areas covered: Areas of potential difficulty include columnar cell lesions, particularly flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia and its variants, and a range of papillary lesions. Fibroepithelial, sclerosing, mucinous, and apocrine lesions are also considered. Established and newer prognostic and predictive markers, such as immune infiltrates, PD-1 and PD-L1 and gene expression assays are evaluated. The unique challenges of pathology assessment post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy are also explored.Expert opinion: Controversies in clinical management arise due to incomplete and sometimes conflicting data on clinicopathological associations, prognosis, and outcome. The review will address some of these challenges.

Interobserver variation in the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast: a multicentre audit by digital pathology

Aim

Fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) of the breast span a morphological continuum including lesions where distinction between cellular fibroadenoma (FA) and benign phyllodes tumour (PT) is difficult. The distinction is clinically important with FAs managed conservatively while equivocal lesions and PTs are managed with surgery. We sought to audit core biopsy diagnoses of equivocal FELs by digital pathology and to investigate whether digital point counting is useful in clarifying FEL diagnoses.

Method

Scanned slide images from cores and subsequent excisions of 69 equivocal FELs were examined in a multicentre audit by eight pathologists to determine the agreement and accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnoses and by digital point counting of stromal cellularity and expansion to determine if classification could be improved.

Results

Interobserver variation was high on CNB with a unanimous diagnosis from all pathologists in only eight cases of FA, diagnoses of both FA and PT on the same CNB in 15 and a ‘weak’ mean kappa agreement between pathologists (k=0.36). ‘Moderate’ agreement was observed on CNBs among breast specialists (k=0.44) and on excision samples (k=0.49). Up to 23% of lesions confidently diagnosed as FA on CNB were PT on excision and up to 30% of lesions confidently diagnosed as PT on CNB were FA on excision. Digital point counting did not aid in the classification of FELs.

Conclusion

Accurate and reproducible diagnosis of equivocal FELs is difficult, particularly on CNB, resulting in poor interobserver agreement and suboptimal accuracy. Given the diagnostic difficulty, and surgical implications, equivocal FELs should be reported in consultation with experienced breast pathologists as a small number of benign FAs can be selected out from equivocal lesions.