Pouches and stomas

Dietary management for people with an ileostomy: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify and map the evidence for oral dietary management of ileostomies.

INTRODUCTION

Dietary advice is commonly provided for ileostomy management but can be inconsistent, conflicting, and inadequate. There is a lack of high-quality research investigating dietary management of ileostomies. This scoping review highlights gaps in the literature that need addressing to inform practice, and identifies dietary strategies and outcomes to be investigated in future studies.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Evidence relating to the use of oral dietary strategies to manage complications and nutritional consequences associated with having an ileostomy was included. Evidence included all types of original research (ie, quantitative and qualitative methodologies, expert opinion articles, and consensus guidelines).

METHODS

This review followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A pre-determined search of 13 databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted in August 2019. The search was not limited by date, but during screening, expert opinion evidence was limited to 2008 onward. Data extraction was carried out by two reviewers for each study/article using a database tool designed specifically for this review. Results are presented using a combination of tabular summaries and narrative reports.

RESULTS

Thirty-one research studies were included: 11 experimental (including four crossover randomized controlled trials), three pre-post design, 13 observational (12 cross-sectional, one longitudinal), and four qualitative. Forty-four expert opinion articles/guidelines were also included. In experimental studies, nine nutrient modifications and 34 individual foods/drinks were investigated. In pre-post studies, 10 nutrient modifications, 80 foods/drinks, and 11 eating-related behaviors were investigated. In observational studies, eight nutrient modifications, 94 foods/drinks, and five eating-related behaviors were reported. In qualitative studies, two nutrient modifications, 17 foods/drinks, and one eating-related behavior were reported. In expert opinion articles/guidelines, recommendations relating to 51 nutrient modifications, 339 foods/drinks, and 23 eating-related behaviors were reported. Although large numbers of individual foods and drinks were suggested to be associated with outcomes relating to ileostomy management, findings from observational studies showed these were generally reported by <50% of people with an ileostomy. The most common nutrients reported in association with outcomes related to ileostomy management were fiber, fat, and alcohol. Across most outcomes and studies/expert opinion, low fiber and low fat were suggested to be beneficial, while alcohol was detrimental. Other nutrient associations frequently reported in expert opinion (but with minimal attention in research studies) included negative consequences of caffeinated drinks and positive effects of white starchy carbohydrates on stoma output. Output volume and consistency were the most commonly reported outcomes relating to ileostomy management across all study types. Flatulence and odor were also common outcomes in observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found an abundance of literature, particularly expert opinion, reporting on dietary management for people with an ileostomy. However, this literature was highly heterogeneous in terms of dietary strategies and outcomes reported. It is likely that most dietary advice provided in practice is based on expert opinion with some supported by limited research. High-quality research investigating the effect of the dietary strategies identified in this review on commonly associated outcomes relating to ileostomy management is needed to improve evidence-based advice.

Provision of dietary advice for people with an ileostomy: a survey in the UK and Ireland

AIM

The aim was to explore whether people with an ileostomy in the UK and Ireland receive the dietary advice they require.

METHOD

An online survey with multiple-choice questions asked people with an ileostomy about the dietary advice they received and would have preferred to receive. Participants were recruited via websites of the Ileostomy and Internal Pouch Association and Crohn's and Colitis UK and via social media. People with a current ileostomy, age 16 years or over, and living in the UK or Ireland were eligible for inclusion. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In all, 291 eligible responses were received and included in the analysis; 201 (69%) received advice on diet for their ileostomy from a healthcare professional or the internet. Of the 90 who did not receive dietary advice, 82 (91%) would have liked advice. Stoma nurses were the most common source of dietary advice (55%), but many other sources were frequently reported. Most (62%) felt that at least some dietary advice they received was conflicting. Over half (55%) felt anxious about managing their diet with a new ileostomy, 39% were confused, and 31% frustrated. Of 291 respondents, 29% received advice from a dietitian compared to 60% who would have preferred advice from a dietitian.

CONCLUSION

Many people undergoing ileostomy surgery do not receive the dietary advice and support they require. Healthcare professionals working with people with an ileostomy should be mindful they are often anxious about their diet and require clear and consistent dietary advice and support.