(v) The management of intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck

A novel design of hip-stem with reduced strain-shielding

The use of uncemented stems in hip arthroplasty has been increasing, even in osteoporotic patients. The major concerns of uncemented hip-stems, however, are peri-prosthetic fracture, thigh pain, and proximal femoral stress-/strain-shielding. In this study, a novel design of uncemented hip-stem is proposed that will reduce such concerns, improve osseointegration, and benefit both osteoporotic and arthritic patients. The stem has a central titanium alloy core surrounded by a set of radial buttresses that are partly porous titanium, as is the stem tip. The aim of the study was to investigate the mechanical behaviour of the proposed partly-porous design, examining load transfer in the short-term, and comparing its strain-shielding behaviour with a solid metal implant. The long-term effect of implant-induced bone remodelling was also simulated. Computed tomography based three-dimensional finite element models of an intact proximal femur, and the same femur implanted with the proposed design, were developed. Peak hip contact and major muscle forces corresponding to level-walking and stair climbing were applied. The proposed partly-porous design had approximately 50% lower strain-shielding than the solid-metal counterpart. Results of bone remodelling simulation indicated that only 16% of the total bone volume is subjected to reduction of bone density. Strain concentrations were observed in the bone around the stem-tip for both solid and porous implants; however, it was less prominent for the porous design. Lower strain-shielding and reduced bone resorption are advantageous for long-term fixation, and the reduced strain concentration around the stem-tip indicates a lower risk of peri-prosthetic fracture.

Interfragmentary motion assessment for three different fixation techniques of femoral neck fractures in young adults

BACKGROUND

Vertical femoral neck fractures in the youth could be happened in high-energy accidents, and because of dominant shearing forces, this fracture is considered as a troublesome injury with a controversy regarding selection of the best fixation method.

OBJECTIVE

The long term goal of this quasi-experimental study was to find the more stable fixation method among cannulated screws (CSs), proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP), and dynamic hip screw with derotational screw (DHS+DS) for this kind of fracture.

METHODS

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs were assigned to three groups that were matched for mean bone mineral density and stiffness of intact bone. Vertical fractures were artificially mimicked in the specimens and fixed using three different implants, i.e. CSs, PFLP, and DHS+DS. Then, the samples were tested under incremental, cyclic, and failure loading phases.

RESULTS

The differences in all biomechanical parameters were statistically significant among tested groups (p<0.05). All biomechanical parameters for the DHS+DS method of fixation are significantly different from those corresponding to CSs (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in failure load and failure energy between the PFLP and CSs techniques (p>0.05). Also, there were no significant differences in relative stiffness and femoral head displacement between the PFLP and DHS+DS groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the clinical assumption that restricted weight-bearing regimen is recommended in the postoperative rehabilitation protocol, the results of this study suggest that the priority order of selection for the stable fixation implant of vertical femoral neck fracture in young patients is DHS+DS, then PFLP, and finally CSs.