1
|
A Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Nab-Paclitaxel with Gemcitabine in Combination with Other Therapeutic Agents as New Treatment Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12030327. [PMID: 35330078 PMCID: PMC8953820 DOI: 10.3390/life12030327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has one of the highest mortality rates among cancers, and a combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine remains the cornerstone of first-line therapy. However, major advances are required to achieve improvements in patient outcomes. For this reason, several research groups have proposed supplementing treatment with other therapeutic agents. Ongoing studies are being conducted to find the optimal treatment in a first-line setting. In this work, we used a search strategy to compare studies on the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in combination with other therapeutic agents based on the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. We found seven studies in different clinical phases that met the inclusion criteria. The seven therapeutic agents were ibrutinib, necuparanib, tarextumab, apatorsen, cisplatin, enzalutamide, and momelotinib. Although these therapeutic agents have different mechanisms of action, and molecular biology studies are still needed, the present review was aimed to answer the following question: which formulations of the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen in combination with other therapeutic agents are safest for patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma? The triple regimen is emerging as the first-line option for patients with pancreatic cancer, albeit with some limitations. Thus, further studies of this regimen are recommended.
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng S, Jin Z, Xue H. Assessment of Response to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Metastasis: CT Texture as a Predictive Biomarker. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122252. [PMID: 34943489 PMCID: PMC8700536 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we assess changes in CT texture of metastatic liver lesions after treatment with chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer and determine if texture parameters correlate with measured time to progression (TTP). This retrospective study included 110 patients with pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis, and mean, entropy, kurtosis, skewness, mean of positive pixels, and standard deviation (SD) values were extracted during texture analysis. Response assessment was also obtained by using RECIST 1.1, Choi and modified Choi criteria, respectively. The correlation of texture parameters and existing assessment criteria with TTP were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses in the training cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves of the proportion of patients without disease progression were significantly different for several texture parameters, and were better than those for RECIST 1.1-, Choi-, and modified Choi-defined response (p < 0.05 vs. p = 0.398, p = 0.142, and p = 0.536, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that percentage change in SD was an independent predictor of TTP (p = 0.016) and confirmed in the validation cohort (p = 0.019). In conclusion, CT texture parameters have the potential to become predictive imaging biomarkers for response evaluation in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu JX, Zhao CF, Chen WB, Liu QC, Li QW, Lin YY, Gao F. Pancreatic cancer: A review of epidemiology, trend, and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:4298-4321. [PMID: 34366606 PMCID: PMC8316912 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite rapid advances in modern medical technology and significant improvements in survival rates of many cancers, pancreatic cancer is still a highly lethal gastrointestinal cancer with a low 5-year survival rate and difficulty in early detection. At present, the incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer are increasing year by year worldwide, no matter in the United States, Europe, Japan, or China. Globally, the incidence of pancreatic cancer is projected to increase to 18.6 per 100000 in 2050, with the average annual growth of 1.1%, meaning that pancreatic cancer will pose a significant public health burden. Due to the special anatomical location of the pancreas, the development of pancreatic cancer is usually diagnosed at a late stage with obvious clinical symptoms. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the risk factors for pancreatic cancer is of great clinical significance for effective prevention of pancreatic cancer. In this paper, the epidemiological characteristics, developmental trends, and risk factors of pancreatic cancer are reviewed and analyzed in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Xiong Hu
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Zhao
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Technology, Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Laboratory Medicine in University of Fujian Province, Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wen-Biao Chen
- Department of Basic Medicine, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou 362011, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qi-Cai Liu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qu-Wen Li
- Department of Priority Laboratory for Zoonoses Research, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yan-Ya Lin
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian 351100, Fujian Province, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pape J, Stamati K, Al Hosni R, Uchegbu IF, Schatzlein AG, Loizidou M, Emberton M, Cheema U. Tissue-Engineering the Fibrous Pancreatic Tumour Stroma Capsule in 3D Tumouroids to Demonstrate Paclitaxel Response. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:4289. [PMID: 33924238 PMCID: PMC8074746 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a unique cancer in that up to 90% of its tumour mass is composed of a hypovascular and fibrotic stroma. This makes it extremely difficult for chemotherapies to be delivered into the core of the cancer mass. We tissue-engineered a biomimetic 3D pancreatic cancer ("tumouroid") model comprised of a central artificial cancer mass (ACM), containing MIA Paca-2 cells, surrounded by a fibrotic stromal compartment. This stromal compartment had a higher concentration of collagen type I, fibronectin, laminin, and hyaluronic acid (HA) than the ACM. The incorporation of HA was validated with alcian blue staining. Response to paclitaxel was determined in 2D MIA Paca-2 cell cultures, the ACMs alone, and in simple and complex tumouroids, in order to demonstrate drug sensitivity within pancreatic tumouroids of increasing complexity. The results showed that MIA Paca-2 cells grew into the complex stroma and invaded as cell clusters with a maximum distance of 363.7 µm by day 21. In terms of drug response, the IC50 for paclitaxel for MIA Paca-2 cells increased from 0.819 nM in 2D to 3.02 nM in ACMs and to 5.87 nM and 3.803 nM in simple and complex tumouroids respectively, indicating that drug penetration may be significantly reduced in the latter. The results demonstrate the need for biomimetic models during initial drug testing and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Pape
- Centre for 3D Models of Health and Disease, Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.P.); (R.A.H.)
| | - Katerina Stamati
- Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK; (K.S.); (M.L.)
| | - Rawiya Al Hosni
- Centre for 3D Models of Health and Disease, Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.P.); (R.A.H.)
| | - Ijeoma F. Uchegbu
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK; (I.F.U.); (A.G.S.)
| | - Andreas G. Schatzlein
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK; (I.F.U.); (A.G.S.)
| | - Marilena Loizidou
- Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK; (K.S.); (M.L.)
| | - Mark Emberton
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7TNF, UK;
| | - Umber Cheema
- Centre for 3D Models of Health and Disease, Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.P.); (R.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raturi VP, Tochinai T, Hojo H, Rachi T, Hotta K, Nakamura N, Zenda S, Motegi A, Ariji T, Hirano Y, Baba H, Ohyoshi H, Nakamura M, Okumura M, Bei Y, Akimoto T. Dose-Volume and Radiobiological Model-Based Comparative Evaluation of the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Risk of Photon and Proton Irradiation Plans in Localized Pancreatic Cancer Without Distant Metastasis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:517061. [PMID: 33194580 PMCID: PMC7645056 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.517061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiobiological model-based studies of photon-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer have reported reduced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, although the risk is still high. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of 3D-passive scattering proton beam therapy (3D-PSPBT) in limiting GI organ at risk (OAR) toxicity in localized pancreatic cancer based on dosimetric data and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Methods: The data of 24 pancreatic cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed, and these patients were planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and 3D-PSPBT. The tumor was targeted without elective nodal coverage. All generated plans consisted of a 50.4-GyE (Gray equivalent) dose in 28 fractions with equivalent OAR constraints, and they were normalized to cover 50% of the planning treatment volume (PTV) with 100% of the prescription dose. Physical dose distributions were evaluated. GI-OAR toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated by using published NTCP Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the dosimetric data, and ΔNTCPIMRT-PSPBT and ΔNTCPVMAT-PSPBT were also computed. Results: Similar homogeneity and conformity for the clinical target volume (CTV) and PTV were exhibited by all three planning techniques (P > 0.05). 3D-PSPBT resulted in a significant dose reduction for GI-OARs in both the low-intermediate dose range (below 30 GyE) and the highest dose region (D max and V 50 GyE) in comparison with IMRT and VMAT (P < 0.05). Based on the NTCP evaluation, the NTCP reduction for GI-OARs by 3D-PSPBT was minimal in comparison with IMRT and VMAT. Conclusion: 3D-PSPBT results in minimal NTCP reduction and has less potential to substantially reduce the toxicity risk of upper GI bleeding, ulceration, obstruction, and perforation endpoints compared to IMRT and VMAT. 3D-PSPBT may have the potential to reduce acute dose-limiting toxicity in the form of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea by reducing the GI-OAR treated volume in the low-to-intermediate dose range. However, this result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay P. Raturi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
- *Correspondence: Vijay P. Raturi
| | - Taku Tochinai
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshiya Rachi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Hotta
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takaki Ariji
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hirano
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiromi Baba
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hajime Ohyoshi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Okumura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yanping Bei
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|